U.S. small bank failures and the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009

  • Received July 24, 2022;
    Accepted October 26, 2022;
    Published November 4, 2022
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(4).2022.05
  • Article Info
    Volume 17 2022, Issue #4, pp. 50-60
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
  • 409 Views
  • 86 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study utilizes logistic regression to identify annual financial statement and performance ratio factors that influenced the failure rate of U.S. small banks before and after the Financial Crisis identified during December 2007 through June, 2009. The study includes rates of small bank failure before and Financial Crisis spanning the years 2001 through 2014. The aim of the paper is to describe in large increase in U.S. small bank failure after the Financial Crisis. The Financial Crisis created drastic sustained changes of the financial system that were designed for large financial institutions. These changes may have created undue hardship for small banks and elevated the rate of small bank failures in the post-Financial Crisis period. Post-Financial Crisis bank failures had lower capital ratios and increased loan portfolio risk relative to the prior period. The combined effect of expansionist monetary policy, increased regulatory costs, and possession of illiquid real estate assets contributed to the higher rate of failure. The identification of factors that contribute to the increase in small bank failures after the Financial Crisis should assist bank managers, policy analysts, and scholars in developing alternative solutions for the future.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. The distribution of the occurrence of bank failures from 2001 to 2014
    • Table 1. Definitions of variables
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics 2001–2014
    • Table 3. Two-sample t-test results
    • Table 4. Correlation matrix
    • Table 5. Logit model regression results
    • Formal Analysis
      John Downs, Richard J. Cebula, Doug Johansen, Maggie Foley
    • Investigation
      John Downs, Richard J. Cebula, Doug Johansen, Maggie Foley
    • Methodology
      John Downs, Richard J. Cebula, Maggie Foley
    • Project administration
      John Downs, Maggie Foley
    • Software
      John Downs, Maggie Foley
    • Validation
      John Downs, Richard J. Cebula, Doug Johansen, Maggie Foley
    • Writing – original draft
      John Downs
    • Conceptualization
      Richard J. Cebula
    • Supervision
      Richard J. Cebula
    • Writing – review & editing
      Richard J. Cebula, Doug Johansen, Maggie Foley