Trade openness and real effective exchange rate volatility: The case of Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.13
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2022, Issue #1, pp. 150-160
- 657 Views
-
576 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2004–2020. The study was conducted in the context that Vietnam’s trade openness is increasing, causing significant challenges in macro management, including exchange rate management. The authors use vector autoregression model and Granger causality test to test this relationship. The study used a vector autoregression model and Granger causality test to investigate the causal relationship between trade openness and real effective exchange rate volatility in Vietnam over the period 2004–2020. The study was conducted in the context of Vietnam’s trade openness index rising, causing significant challenges in macro management, including exchange rate management. The study takes a new approach (i) using Vietnam’s real effective exchange rate relative to 143 trading partners; and (ii) examining the impact of economic growth on trade openness and exchange rate volatility. The research results indicate that trade openness has a two-way Granger causality with effective real exchange rate volatility in Vietnam at the 1% significance level. Specifically, the effect of trade openness on real exchange rate volatility is positive at a 1-period lag and 4-period lag. Meanwhile, real exchange rate fluctuations have a negative effect on trade openness with a 1-period lag. At the same time, the study also finds that increased economic growth reduces real effective exchange rate volatility and increases Vietnam’s trade openness. On that basis, the study proposes implications for the management of trade openness and exchange rate management in the current Vietnamese context.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F15, F31, F41, F43
-
References35
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Analysis of impulse-response functions (IRF)
- Figure 2. Unit circle
-
- Table 1. Unit root test results
- Table 2. Determining the optimal lag
- Table 3. Testing results for the relationship between the V_reer and OPEN
- Table 4. Granger causality Wald tests
-
- Alam, K. J., & Sumon, K. K. (2020). Causal relationship between trade openness and economic growth: A panel data analysis of Asian countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 10(1), 118-126.
- Arize, A. C. (1997). Conditional exchange-rate volatility and the volume of foreign trade: Evidence from seven industrialized countries. Southern Economic Journal, 64(1), 235-254.
- Bagella, M., Becchetti, L., & Hasan, I. (2006). Real effective exchange rate volatility and growth: A framework to measure advantages of flexibility vs. costs of volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1149-1169.
- Benita, F. (2019). Trade openness, economic growth and the global financial crisis of 2007–2009 in Latin America. Journal of International Development, 31(5), 411-431.
- Berdiev, A. N., Kim, Y., & Chang, C. P. (2012). The political economy of exchange rate regimes in developed and developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(1), 38-53.
- Bleaney, M. (2008). Openness and real exchange rate volatility: in search of an explanation. Open Economies Review, 19(2), 135-146.
- Brzozowski, M. (2006). Exchange rate variability and foreign direct investment: consequences of EMU enlargement. Eastern European Economics, 44(1), 5-24.
- Calderon, C. (2004). Trade openness and real exchange rate volatility: panel data evidence (Working Papers No. 294).
- Calderón, C., & Kubota, M. (2018). Does higher openness cause more real exchange rate volatility? Journal of International Economics, 110, 176-204.
- Candelon, B., Kool, C., Raabe, K., & Van Veen, T. (2007). Long-run real exchange rate determinants: Evidence from eight new EU member states, 1993–2003. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 87-107.
- Carrieri, F., Errunza, V., & Majerbi, B. (2006). Does emerging market exchange risk affect global equity prices? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(3), 511-540.
- Clare, G. (1992). The impact of exchange rate risk on the foreign direct investment of US multinational manufacturing companies. Open Economies Review, 3(2), 143-163.
- Crowley, P., & Lee, J. (2003). Exchange rate volatility and foreign investment: International evidence. The International Trade Journal, 17(3), 227-252.
- Devereux, M. B., & Lane, P. R. (2003). Understanding bilateral exchange rate volatility. Journal of International Economics, 60(1), 109-132.
- Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
- Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1161-1176.
- Drine, I., & Rault, C. (2006). Learning about the long-run determinants of real exchange rates for developing countries: A panel data investigation. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 274, 307-325.
- General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2018). The 2017 economic census – Result of Foreign Invested Enterprises in the period 2011–2016.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
- Hau, H. (2002). Real exchange rate volatility and economic openness: theory and evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34(3), 611-630.
- Hausmann, R., Panizza, U., & Rigobon, R. (2006). The long-run volatility puzzle of the real exchange rate. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(1), 93-124.
- Karras, G. (2006). Trade openness, economic size, and macroeconomic volatility: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Integration, 21(2), 254-272.
- Kong, Q., Peng, D., Ni, Y., Jiang, X., & Wang, Z. (2020). Trade openness and Economic Growth Quality of China: Empirical Analysis Using ARDL Model. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101488.
- Lanyi, A., & Suss, E. C. (1982). Exchange rate variability: alternative measures and interpretation. Staff Papers, 29(4), 527-560.
- Li, X. (2004). Trade liberalization and real exchange rate movement. IMF Staff Papers, 51(3), 553-584.
- Lien, N. T. K., Doan, T. T. T., & Bui, T. N. (2020). Fintech and banking: Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(9), 419-426.
- Linh, N., & Lien, N. (2020). The impact of real effective exchange rate volatility on trade balance in Vietnam. Accounting, 6(6), 1167-1172.
- Lütkepohl, H. (1993). Testing for causation between two variables in higher-dimensional VAR models. In Studies in applied econometrics (pp. 75-91).
- Melecký, M., & Komárek, L. (2007). The behavioral equilibrium exchange rate of the Czech Koruna. Transition Studies Review, 14(1), 105-121.
- Mpofu, T. R. (2021). The determinants of real exchange rate volatility in South Africa. The World Economy, 44(5), 1380-1401.
- Nelson, C. R., & Plosser, C. R. (1982). Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(2), 139-162.
- Romelli, D., Terra, C., & Vasconcelos, E. (2018). Current account and real exchange rate changes: The impact of trade openness. European Economic Review, 105, 135-158.
- Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
- Stockman, A. C. (1983). Real exchange rates under alternative nominal exchange-rate systems. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2(2), 147-166.
- Vita, G. D., & Abbott, A. (2007). Do exchange rates have any impact upon UK inward foreign direct investment? Applied Economics, 39(20), 2553-2564.