Toward strategic supremacy through absorptive capacity: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity at Jordanian commercial banks
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(3).2024.10
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2024, Issue #3, pp. 102-120
- 184 Views
-
58 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Disruption in the business environment imposes undeniable realities that require effective strategic management; therefore, the need to develop a particular type of force capable of achieving proactive strategies, influencing competitors’ behavior, and balancing competitive forces has arisen. This study aimed to examine the impact of absorptive capacity on achieving strategic supremacy and the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity within Jordan’s commercial banking industry. It employs 513 questionnaires from middle and upper management through proportionate stratified random sampling. It adopts a quantitative approach through partial least squares structural equation modeling to construct a research model comprising factors affecting strategic supremacy and the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity and validate the research hypotheses. The study revealed that absorptive capacity significantly impacts organization ambidexterity (β = 0.764, t = 33.939, p = 0.000) with explanation power (R2 = 0.584). Organizational ambidexterity has a significant positive impact on strategic supremacy (β = 0.561, t = 12.469, p = 0.000). Absorptive capacity has a significant positive impact on strategic supremacy through organizational ambidexterity (β = 0.334, t = 6.963, p = 0.000) with high explanation power (R2 = 0.712), which means that 71.2% of the variance in strategic supremacy has been explained by absorptive capacity and organizational ambidexterity. Moreover, organizational ambidexterity partially mediates their relationship. It also found that the model’s predictive power was moderate. The study concludes that Jordanian commercial banks have placed high importance on identifying and acquiring valuable external knowledge and balancing their short-term and long-term opportunities to achieve strategic supremacy, leading to sustainable competitive advantage.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, M10, M19
-
References79
-
Tables11
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Structural model and results from the hypotheses tests
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Discriminant validity: Fornell-Larcker criterion
- Table 3. Discriminant validity: Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio
- Table 4. Collinearity assessment: Variation inflation factor values in the structural model
- Table 5. Predictive relevance (Q2 predict values)
- Table 6. Q2 predict values
- Table 7. Results of the significance test for the path coefficients (direct effects)
- Table 8. Results of the significance test for the path coefficients (specific indirect effects)
- Table 9. Results of the significance test for the total effects
- Table A1. List of items for absorptive capacity (ACAP), strategic supremacy (SS), and organizational ambidexterity (OA) and their dimension literature sources
- Table B1. Reliability and validity of reflective measurement model
-
- Abazeed, R. A. (2022). The impact of dynamic capabilities on strategic supremacy through organizational immunity at Jordanian telecommunication companies. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 18(3), 321-344.
- Algarni, M. A., Ali, M., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & Albort-Morant, G. (2023). The differential effects of potential and realized absorptive capacity on imitation and innovation strategies, and its impact on sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113674.
- Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
- Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Askari, M.R., Yaghoubi, M., & Barani, O. (2023). Knowledge assets, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2136-2161.
- Association of Banks in Jordan. (2022). ạlnãsẖ̊raẗu ạl̊maṣ̊rifīãẗu kānūna ạltẖãạnī -2022 [Banking bulletin January-2022]. (In Arabic).
- Ávila, M. M. (2022). Competitive advantage and knowledge absorptive capacity: The mediating role of innovative capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 185-210.
- Balle, A. R., Oliveira, M., & Curado, C. M. M. (2020). Knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity: Interdependency and complementarity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1943-1964.
- Batra, I., & Dhir, S. (2023). Toward improved international joint ventures performance in India: The mediating role of ambidexterity and the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 30(3), 488-506.
- Becker, J., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 359-394.
- Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 7-19.
- Bossaghzadeh, N., Moradi, M., & Tamimi, M. (2023). A model for gaining competitive advantage in Iranian export companies based on organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity. Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 8(1), 102-122.
- Central Bank of Jordan. (2023). dalylu ạl̊qiṭāʿi ạl̊maṣ̊rifīĩ [Banking Sector Guide]. (In Arabic).
- Chang, C. Y., Chang, Y. Y., Tsao, Y. C., & Kraus, S. (2022). The power of knowledge management: How top management team bricolage boosts ambidexterity and performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(11), 188-213.
- Cheah, S. C., & Tan, C. L. (2023). External knowledge sourcing, organizational ambidexterity and manufacturing performance: A new insight for dynamic operation management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(5), 643-1666.
- Chen, M. J., Lin, H. C., & Michel, J. G. (2010). Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: The roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1410-1430.
- Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H., & Lin, Y. H. (2014). The determinants of green radical and incremental innovation performance: Green shared vision, green absorptive capacity, and green organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability, 6(11), 7787-7806.
- Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203-213.
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
- Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
- D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. The Free Press.
- D’Aveni, R. A. (1999). Strategic supremacy through disruption and dominance. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 127-141.
- D’Aveni, R. A. (2002). Competitive pressure systems: Mapping and managing multimarket contact. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 39-49.
- D’Aveni, R. A. (2004). Corporate spheres of influence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 38-46.
- D’Aveni, R. A., Gunther, R. E., & Cole, J. (2001). Strategic supremacy: How industry leaders create growth, wealth, and power through spheres of influence. The Free Press.
- Datta, A. (2011). Review and extension on ambidexterity: A theoretical model integrating networks and absorptive capacity. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(1), 1-22.
- De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). Routledge.
- Del Carpio Gallegos, J. F., Miralles, F., & Soria Gomez, E. J. (2021). Impact of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on innovation. Dimensión Empresarial, 19(1), 42-63.
- Doblinger, C., Wales, W., & Zimmermann, A. (2022). Stemming the downturn: How ambidexterity and public policy influence firm performance stability during economic crises. European Management Journal, 40(2), 163-174.
- Dranev, Y., Izosimova, A., & Meissner, D. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: Assessment approaches and empirical evidence. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11, 676-691.
- Economic and Social Council of Jordan (2021). taq̊ryru ḥālaẗiⁿ ạlbạld 2021 [Country Status Report]. (In Arabic).
- Fernhaber, S. A., & Patel, P. C. (2012). How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1516-1539.
- Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116.
- Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega, 36(2), 173-187.
- Gómez, J., Orcos, R., & Palomas, S. (2020). Operating under the radar in spheres of influence: Taking advantage of industry leaders’ market domains. Strategic Organization, 18(2), 275-300.
- Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167-189.
- Gutiérrez, L. J. G., Bustinza, O. F., & Barrales Molina, V. (2012). Six sigma, absorptive capacity and organisational learning orientation. International Journal of Production Research, 50(3), 661-675.
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling [PLS-SEM] (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566-584.
- Harvey, M., Kiessling, T., & Novicevic, M. (2003). Staffing marketing positions during global hyper-competitiveness: A market-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(2), 223-245.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
- Hwang, B. N., Lai, Y. P., & Wang, C. (2023). Open innovation and organizational ambidexterity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 862-884.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2023). Jordan: Financial sector assessment program-financial system stability assessment. IMF Staff Country Reports, 2023(140).
- Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.
- Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., García-Morales, V. J., & Molina, L. M. (2011). Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5-6), 190-202.
- Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business Review, 28(4), 431-448.
- Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506-521.
- Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.
- Kotzé, J. G. (2003). Strategic supremacy in the hypercompetitive 21st century. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 6(1), 99-117.
- Kumkale, İ. (2022). Organizational mastery: The impact of strategic leadership and organizational ambidexterity on organizational agility. Springer.
- Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
- Lee, Y., Cortes, A. F., Zhuang, Y., & Herrmann, P. (2021). Social capital and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1793-1812.
- Mariano, S., & Walter, C. (2015). The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: Content and text analyses. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 372-400.
- Noblet, J. P., Simon, E., & Parent, R. (2011). Absorptive capacity: A proposed operationalization. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 367-377.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
- Pangarso, A., Astuti, E. S., Raharjo, K., & Afrianty, T. W. (2020). The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: The case of Indonesian higher education. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2436-2455.
- Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Perez-Gonzalez, D. (2018). An investigation of the effect of electronic business on financial performance of Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 355-362.
- Robertson, D. A., & Caldart, A. A. (2009). The dynamics of strategy: Mastering strategic landscapes of the firm. Oxford University Press.
- Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780.
- Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185.
- Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019a). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197-211.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2019b). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531-554.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Mcgraw-Hill.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Row.
- Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
- Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894.
- Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2022). Performance implications of organizational and interorganizational ambidexterity. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 17(1), 38-49.
- Strikwerda, J., & Rijnders, D. (2005). Possible end games in the European postal market: Qui bone? In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Regulatory and economics changes in the postal and delivery sector (pp. 295-316). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556.
- Tsai, J. M., Chang, C. C., & Hung, S. W. (2018). Technology acquisition models for fast followers in high-technological markets: An empirical analysis of the LED industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(2), 198-210.
- Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective – Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931-951.
- Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
- Wang, C., & Han, Y. (2011). Linking properties of knowledge with innovation performance: The moderate role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5), 802-819.
- Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 147-150.