Toward strategic supremacy through absorptive capacity: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity at Jordanian commercial banks

  • 184 Views
  • 58 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Disruption in the business environment imposes undeniable realities that require effective strategic management; therefore, the need to develop a particular type of force capable of achieving proactive strategies, influencing competitors’ behavior, and balancing competitive forces has arisen. This study aimed to examine the impact of absorptive capacity on achieving strategic supremacy and the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity within Jordan’s commercial banking industry. It employs 513 questionnaires from middle and upper management through proportionate stratified random sampling. It adopts a quantitative approach through partial least squares structural equation modeling to construct a research model comprising factors affecting strategic supremacy and the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity and validate the research hypotheses. The study revealed that absorptive capacity significantly impacts organization ambidexterity (β = 0.764, t = 33.939, p = 0.000) with explanation power (R2 = 0.584). Organizational ambidexterity has a significant positive impact on strategic supremacy (β = 0.561, t = 12.469, p = 0.000). Absorptive capacity has a significant positive impact on strategic supremacy through organizational ambidexterity (β = 0.334, t = 6.963, p = 0.000) with high explanation power (R2 = 0.712), which means that 71.2% of the variance in strategic supremacy has been explained by absorptive capacity and organizational ambidexterity. Moreover, organizational ambidexterity partially mediates their relationship. It also found that the model’s predictive power was moderate. The study concludes that Jordanian commercial banks have placed high importance on identifying and acquiring valuable external knowledge and balancing their short-term and long-term opportunities to achieve strategic supremacy, leading to sustainable competitive advantage.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research model
    • Figure 2. Structural model and results from the hypotheses tests
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 2. Discriminant validity: Fornell-Larcker criterion
    • Table 3. Discriminant validity: Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio
    • Table 4. Collinearity assessment: Variation inflation factor values in the structural model
    • Table 5. Predictive relevance (Q2 predict values)
    • Table 6. Q2 predict values
    • Table 7. Results of the significance test for the path coefficients (direct effects)
    • Table 8. Results of the significance test for the path coefficients (specific indirect effects)
    • Table 9. Results of the significance test for the total effects
    • Table A1. List of items for absorptive capacity (ACAP), strategic supremacy (SS), and organizational ambidexterity (OA) and their dimension literature sources
    • Table B1. Reliability and validity of reflective measurement model
    • Conceptualization
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Data curation
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Formal Analysis
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Funding acquisition
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Investigation
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Methodology
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Resources
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Writing – original draft
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh
    • Writing – review & editing
      Ayman Jarrar, Khaled Al Shawabkeh