Theoretical and methodological basis for technology transfer from universities to the business environment

  • Received December 9, 2017;
    Accepted January 30, 2018;
    Published April 2, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Nataliya I. Chukhray
    ORCID ,
    Oleksandra Mrykhina
    ORCID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.38
  • Article Info
    Volume 16 2018, Issue #1, pp. 399-416
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    8 articles
  • 3733 Views
  • 334 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The modern concept of open innovation highlights the role of technology transfer from universities to the business environment. An increase in technology transfer efficiency is one of the tasks assigned to Ukrainian universities by the state. The nature of technology transfers in the world and the role of universities in this process call for revising traditional approaches to its production in Ukraine. This stipulated the substantiation of theoretical and methodological principles of technology transfer from universities to the business environment, which should serve as a fundamental platform for further economic, technological and other actions in the innovation development of Ukraine. For this purpose, the modern theoretical and applied components of technology transfer from universities to the business environment are researched; the theoretical and methodological principles of technology transfer are determined and the conceptual approach to understanding technology transfer from universities to the business environment is proved. To achieve the tasks at hand, the background and trends in technology transfer from universities to the business environment have been researched; the role of universities in modern technology transfers is analyzed; the peculiarities and potential of the scientific area of Ukraine are considered; the influence of university technology transfer centers on the universities’ academic entrepreneurship has been studied; the nature of knowledge transformation during the technology transfer is substantiated; the influence of technology transfer on the university subsystems is considered; the effects of technology transfer are investigated; models of interaction in the system “University – Governmental Authority – Business” are studied; and modern approaches to the technology transfer from universities to the business environment are researched. Given the research conducted, theoretical and methodological principles for technology transfer were formed, which conceptualize the technology transfer from universities to the business environment.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Specific weight of R&D expenditures as part of GDP in EU countries and Ukraine, 2016, %
    • Figure 2. Schematic representation of knowledge transformation chains during the technology transfer
    • Figure 3. Mutual influence of theories within the technology transfer
    • Figure 4. The emergence and effect of technology transfer
    • Figure 5. Conceptual approach to understanding of technology transfer from universities to business environment
    • Androsova, O. F. (2006). Організаційно-економічні аспекти використання трансферу технологій на підприємствах авіаційної промисловості [Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni aspekty vykorystannia transferu tekhnolohii na pidpryiemstvakh aviatsiinoi promyslovosti]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: NAU.
    • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175-188.
    • Bickmore, D. A., & Law, J. (Eds). (2013). Technology Transfer Desk Reference: A Comprehensive Guide to Technology Transfer (6th ed.). NJ: Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer.
    • Bloomberg Finance L. P.
    • Butenko, D. S., & Tkachuk, I. I. (2015). Трансфер інноваційних технологій: сутність і значення для сучасної економіки України [Transfer innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii: sutnist i znachennia dlia suchasnoi ekonomiky Ukrainy]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky, 3, 232-235.
    • Butnik-Siverskyi, S. F. et al. (2006). Економіко-правові проблеми в сфері інтелектуальної власності [Ekonomiko-pravovi problemy v sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti]. Kyiv: NDI intelektualnoi vlasnosti APrN Ukrainy.
    • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201-234.
    • Chen, J. K. C., Chiu, W.-H., Kong, S. F. L., Leo, Y. T., & Lin (2010). Evaluating Global Technology Transfer Research Performance. China: IEEE.
    • Chesbrough, H. W., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Chukhray, N. I., & Shcherbata, T. S. (2016). Співробітництво між підприємствами-виробниками інформаційно-технологічного продуктута ВНЗ [Spivrobitnytstvo mizh pidpryiemstvamy-vyrobnykamy informatsiino-tekhnolohichnoho produktu ta VNZ]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 3, 161-169.
    • Dovbenko, V. I. (2013). Роль потенціалу трансферу знань і технологій в інноваційному процесі [Rol potentsialu transferu znan i tekhnolohii v innovatsiinomu protsesi]. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku, 776, 254-263.
    • Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic Behavior and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature) (404 p.). Cambridge University Press.
    • Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science. Minerva, 21(2-3), 198-233.
    • Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management and locations matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
    • FY2015: U.S. Licensing Activity Survey (2017). NY: The Association of University Technology Managers.
    • Gibson, D., & Smilor, R. (1991). Key Variables in Technology Transfer: A Field-Study Based Empirical Analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8, 287-312.
    • Global innovation index.
    • Grosul, V. A. (2010). Проблеми інноваційної діяльності в Україні [Problemy innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini]. Biuleten Mizhnarodnoho Nobelivskoho ekonomichnoho forumu, 1(3), 76-82.
    • Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process.
    • Heiets, V. M. et al. (2015). Інноваційна Україна – 2020: національна доповідь [Innovatsiina Ukraina – 2020: natsionalna dopovid].
    • Illiashenko, S. M. (2011). Інтелектуальний капітал ВНЗ як запорука його інноваційного розвитку: сутність, структура, підходи до оцінки [Intelektualnyi kapital VNZ yak zaporuka yoho innovatsiinoho rozvytku: sutnist, struktura, pidkhody do otsinky]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 1, 145-154.
    • Izhevskyi, P. H. (2006). Ефективність організаційних форм трансферу технологій на виробничих підприємствах [Efektyvnist orhanizatsiinykh form transferu tekhnolohii na vyrobnychykh pidpryiemstvakh]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Khmelnytskyi: KhNU.
    • Kamianska, О. V. (2008). Управління трансфером технологій на машинобудівних підприємтсвах [Upravlinnia transferom tekhnolohii na mashynobudivnykh pidpryiemstvakh]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”.
    • Karmazina, O. O. (n.d.). Наукова та інноваційна діяльність України: статистичний збірник [Naukova ta innovatsiina diialnist Ukrainy: statystychnyi zbirnyk].
    • Keyns, J. М. (1965). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1st ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World.
    • Kislenko, O. V. (Ed.) (2016). Здійснення наукових досліджень і розробок в Україні. Доповідь [Zdiisnennia naukovykh doslidzhen i rozrobok v Ukraini. Dopovid]. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy.
    • Kniaz, S. V., & Heorhiadi, N. H. (2011). Трансферний потенціал інноваційного розвитку підприємства: сутність і характеристики [Transfernyi potentsial innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstva: sutnist i kharakterystyky]. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia ta problemy rozvytku, 714, 341-348.
    • Kosenko, O. P. (2016). Організаційно-економічний механізм комерціалізації інтелектуально-інноваційних технологій на машинобудівному підприємстві [Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm komertsializatsii intelektualno-innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii na mashynobudivnomu pidpryiemstvi]. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv: National Technical University of Ukraine “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”.
    • Le Bon, G. (1977). The Crowd. New York: Penguin Books.
    • Liashenko, О. М. (2009). Методи та моделі комерціалізації трансферу технологій [Metody ta modeli komertsializatsii transferu tekhnolohii]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine.
    • Mansfield, E. (1975). East-West technological transfer issues and problems, international technology transfer: Forms, resource requirements, and policies. American Economic Review, 65(2), 372-376.
    • Mayer, S., & Blaas, W. (2002). Technology transfer: an opportunity for small open economies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(3), 275-289.
    • Monnet, J. (1976). Memoires. Paris: Artheme Fayard.
    • Mrykhina, O. B. (2017). Conceptual framework for the formation of information and analytical system for technology transfer. Aktualni Problemy Ekonomiky, 158, 454-463.
    • Pererva, P. H., & Hladenko I. V. (2010). Моніторинг інноваційної діяльності: інтерпретація результатів [Monitorynh innovatsiinoi diialnosti: interpretatsiia rezultativ]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 2, 108-116.
    • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Simon and Schuster.
    • Salikhova, O. B. (2003). Удосконалення методології статистичного аналізу міжнародного трансферу технологій в Україні [Udoskonalennia metodolohii statystychnoho analizu mizhnarodnoho transferu tekhnolohii v Ukraini]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: Institute for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies. AHEM. Dobrov NAS UKRAINE.
    • Schwab, K. (Ed.). (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
    • Tinbergen, J. (1972). De convergentietheorie: antikritiek (The Convergence Theory: Anti-Criticism).
    • Tsybuliov, P. M., Chebotarov, V. P., Zinov, V. H., & Suini, Iu. (2005). Управління інтелектуальною власністю [Upravlinnia intelektualnoiu vlasnistiu]. Кyiv: “К.І.S.”.
    • World Intellectual Property Organization.
    • Yastremska, O. M., & Vereshchahina, H. V. (2010). Управління інноваційною діяльністю [Upravlinnia innovatsiinoiu diialnistiu]. Kharkiv: INZHEK.
    • Державна служба статистики України [Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy].
    • Державна служба статистики України [Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy].
    • Закон України Про наукову і науково-технічну діяльність [Zakon Ukrainy Pro naukovu i naukovo-tekhnichnu diialnist] (n.d.).
    • Наукова та інноваційна діяльність України (2017): статистичний збірник [Naukova ta innovatsiina diialnist Ukrainy: statystychnyi zbirnyk].
    • Розпорядження Кабінету міністрів України Про схвалення концепції розвитку національної інноваційної системи [Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu ministriv Ukrainy Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii rozvytku natsionalnoi innovatsiinoi systemy (n.d.).
Related Articles

  • Interest in universities based on search queries on the Internet

    Yulia BondarenkoORCID , Solomiya OhinokORCID , Artur KisiołekORCID , Oleh Karyy ORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.15
    Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021         Issue #3         pp. 179-190 Views: 2965 Downloads: 168 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The improvement of global Internet access and the COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitated mass testing of online teaching methods, have forwarded the competition between higher education institutions from the regional level and the struggle for the rich student into the competition for students in all countries. The paper aims to determine the influence of the rating of higher education institutions on the interest of Internet users by conducting a comparative analysis of the popularity of the official names of higher education institutions in search queries in Ukraine and Poland. To do this, a comparative analysis of the change in the interest in leading higher education institutions in Ukraine and Poland in search queries in the Google search engine is carried out. The analysis is performed using the Google Trends web application. As a result, it is found that a high position of the university in the national ranking does not guarantee more search queries about it on the Internet by both national Internet users and users from the neighboring country. In general, Internet users continue to be most interested in universities located in their region at the time of the search.

  • Marketing environment and marketing management of universities in Ukraine: national and regional dominants

    Yurii PetruniaORCID , Victor ChentsovORCID Researcher ID, Norbert ŻyczyńskiORCID , Vira PetruniaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(1).2019.01
    Innovative Marketing Volume 15, 2019         Issue #1         pp. 1-12 Views: 1589 Downloads: 297 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The marketing environment of universities’ activities in Ukraine is changing dramatically. As a result, the system of chances and risks for universities is constantly changing. Therefore, timely detection of changes in the marketing environment and effective management ensure the competitiveness of the universities. The aim of the article is to identify the marketing environment dominants of the Ukrainian universities, as well as to assess the efficiency of marketing tools application in the system of universities’ management. On the basis of statistical and primary data analyses, the higher education market in Ukraine both at the state and regional levels has been assessed and the university’s dependence on market sources of funding has been substantiated. As the modern domains of the marketing environment of universities, changes in the distribution of state-funded places, the impact of external independent testing, and the intensification of competition between universities are determined. The influence of external independent testing on structural intersegmental changes concerning the choice of specialties of universities’ entrants is proved. The comparative characteristics of the marketing management tools in Ukrainian and Polish universities are considered. The obtained results outline the importance of strengthening the marketing orientation of management in universities.

  • Technology transfer management culture (education-based approach)

    Vitaliy OmelyanenkoORCID Researcher ID, Inna Semenets-OrlovaORCID Researcher ID, Olena KhomerikiORCID Researcher ID, Lyudmyla LyasotaORCID Researcher ID, Yuliia MedviedievaORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.36
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 454-463 Views: 1410 Downloads: 295 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Research deals with the analysis of theoretical aspects of increasing the competence of scientists and experts, whose task is to work with technology as a good promotion of technology on the market with a view to its commercialization or search for technological solutions according to the tasks of the organization and to examine the startup methodology as a tool of improving the technology transfer skills efficiency. The new specifics of technology transfer management within the Education 3.0 paradigm are considered. In the paper, the authors analyze the technology transfer as important source of innovation creation and an integral part of business development. Target result of technologies introduction, implemented within limited period with limited resources as an innovative purpose of technology transfer, which is aimed at the best possible development of organization, is identified. The paper also suggests consider¬ing processes of technology development and technology transfer based on startup methodology.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management