The role of sticky cost behavior in supply chain management: Evidence from Jordan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.27
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #2, pp. 257-266
- 570 Views
-
196 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to examine the relationship between sticky cost behavior and supply chain management of Jordanian manufacturing firms. The data are collected using a questionnaire targeting 25 Jordanian manufacturing firms. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis and correlation. The results reveal a positive relationship between supply chain management and sticky cost behavior (the correlation factor is 81.2%), indicating that the higher the level of sticky costs, the higher the supply chain management level. Moreover, the study found a positive and significant link between target costing and supply chain management (the correlation factor is 68.1%). The findings suggest that manufacturing companies in Jordan should consider the impact of sticky cost behavior on their supply chain management practices and that target costing can be an effective approach to improve supply chain management. The study adds to the previous studies on cost behavior and supply chain management, providing insights for manufacturing companies in Jordan and beyond on improving their supply chain management practices.
Acknowledgment
I want to thank Amman Arab University for funding this study.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M11, M41, D24
-
References35
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Cronbach’s alpha
- Table 2. Correlation matrix
- Table 3. Multiple regression results
-
- Abdallah, A. B., Obeidat, B. Y., & Aqqad, N. O. (2014). The impact of supply chain management practices on supply chain performance in Jordan: The moderating effect of competitive intensity. International Business Research, 7(3), 13.
- Abeysekara, N., Wang, H., & Kuruppuarachchi, D. (2019). Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1673- 1695.
- Anderson, S. W., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs sticky? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63.
- Argilés-Bosch, J., Blandon, J., Ravenda, D., Silva, M., & Somozo, A. (2017). The influence of the trade-off between profitability and future increases in sales on cost stickiness. Estudios de Economía, 44(1), 81-104.
- Aslam, H., Khan, A., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185-1204.
- Azetsu, K., & Fukushige, M. (2005). Job security laws and structural change in the Japanese labor market (Discussion Paper No. 05-31). Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP), Osaka University.
- Banker, R. D., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., & Chen, J. Y. (2016). The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 203-220.
- Bin Makhashen, Y. B., Rafi-ul-Shan, P. M., Bashiri, M., Hasan, R., Amar, H., & Khan, M. N. (2020). Exploring the role of ambidexterity and coopetition in designing resilient fashion supply chains: A multivalence-based approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(6), 1599-1625.
- Bokrantz, J., & Dul, J. (2023). Building and testing necessity theories in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59(1), 48-65.
- Britto, R. A., Corsi, T. M., & Grimm, C. M. (2010). The relationship between motor carrier financial performance and safety performance. Transportation Journal, 49(4), 42-51.
- Burin, A., Perez-Arostegui, M., & Llorens-Montes, J. (2020). Ambidexterity and IT competence can improve supply chain flexibility? A resource orchestration approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2), 100610.
- Cantor, D. E., Yan, T., Pagell, M., & Tate, W. L. (2022). From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(2), 3-7.
- Chen, C. J. (2019). Developing a model for supply chain agility and innovativeness to enhance firms’ competitive advantage. Management Decision, 57(7), 1511-1534.
- Cooper, R. W., & Haltiwanger, J. C. (2006). On the nature of capital adjustment costs. The Review of Economic Studies, 73(3), 611-633.
- Dai, J., Hu, N., Huang, R., & Yan, Y. (2023). How does credit risk affect cost management strategies? Evidence on the initiation of credit default swap and sticky cost behavior. Journal of Corporate Finance, 80, 102401.
- Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S., Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110-128.
- Flatt, S. J., & Kowalczyk, S. J. (2008). Creating competitive advantage through intangible assets: The direct and indirect effects of corporate culture and reputation. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 16(1/2), 13-30.
- Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
- Gujarati, D. N. (2021). Essentials of econometrics. SAGE Publications.
- Hald, K. S., & Thrane, S. (2015). Management accounting and supply chain strategy. 1st International Competitiveness Management Conference. Frederiksberg, Denmark.
- Hatani, L., Djumahir, Z. D., & Wirjodirjo, B. (2013). Competitive advantage as relationship mediation between supply chain integration and fishery company performance in Southeast Sulawesi (Indonesia). IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 1-14.
- Hussien, L., Okour, S., AlRawashdeh, H., Ali, O., Zraqat, O., & Zureigat, Q. (2021). Explanatory factors for asymmetric cost behaviour: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(4), 201-219.
- Ibrahim, A. E. A. (2018). Board characteristics and asymmetric cost behavior: Evidence from Egypt. Accounting Research Journal, 31(2), 301-322.
- Jian, J., Zhang, Y., Jiang, L., & Su, J. (2020). Coordination of supply chains with competing manufacturers considering fairness concerns. Complexity, 2020, 4372603.
- Jiang, L., & Hansen, C. Ø. (2016). Target costing as a strategic tool to commercialize the product and service innovation. CBS Maritime.
- Karimi, E., & Rafiee, M. (2022). Analyzing the impact of supply chain management practices on organizational performance through competitive priorities (Case study: Iran pumps company). International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(1), 1-21.
- Kearney, A. T. (2013). Creating competitive advantage through the supply chain: Insights on India. CSCMP: India.
- Kim, S., Chae, S., Wagner, S. M., & Miller, J. W. (2022). Buyer abusive behavior and supplier welfare: An empirical study of truck owner-operators. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(4), 90-111.
- Magheed, B. A. (2016). The determines of the sticky cost behavior in the Jordanian industrial companies listed in Amman stock market. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management (JABM), 23(1), 64-81.
- Mandal, S., & Sarathy, R. (2018). The effect of supply chain relationships on resilience: Empirical evidence from India. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S196-S217.
- Palm, F. C., & Pfann, G. A. (1998). Sources of asymmetry in production factor dynamics. Journal of Econometrics, 82(2), 361-392.
- Pamplona, E., Fiirst, C., Silva, T. B. D. J., & Zonatto, V. C. D. S. (2016). Sticky costs in cost behavior of the largest companies in Brazil, Chile and Mexico. Contaduría y Administración, 61(4), 682-704.
- Subramaniam, C., & Watson, M. W. (2016). Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs. In Advances in management accounting, 26 (pp. 275-305). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Sundram, V. P. K., Ibrahim, A. R., & Govindaraju, V. C. (2011). Supply chain management practices in the electronics industry in Malaysia: Consequences for supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(6), 834-855.
- Talha, M., & Raja, J. B. (2010). Role of supply chain management in target costing. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6(7), 46-57.