The role of earnings management in the relationship between accruals and market value
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.20
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2018, Issue #1, pp. 236-244
- 1467 Views
-
191 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper aims to clarify the role of earnings management in the relationship between accruals and the market value of companies. Previous studies suggest that some managers, for providing a desirable image of their performance, manage their profits through distorting cash or accruals. Consequently, investors rely on this information and estimate inaccurate stability of accruals which lead to mispricing phenomenon. Finally, the returns earned by the investors will not be equal to the expected return and thus the accrual anomaly will be created.
To this aim, two hypotheses were developed and three regression models were applied to analyze the data. To analyze and estimate the models employed, the financial information of 110 companies listed on the stock exchange between years 2008 to 2014 is used. A selective approach to test the hypotheses is studying cross-sectional data.
After conducting statistical tests, the results showed that discretionary accruals through which earnings management is done are improperly valued by the market, but the issue is not applicable regarding the non-discretionary accruals. Based on the close relationship between earnings management and discretionary accruals it can be found that earnings management can have an effect on the relationship between accruals and market value.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, M40, G17, G19
-
References21
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Definitions of the used variables
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Results of the simultaneous estimation of models (4) and (5)
- Table 4. Mishkin test results
- Table 5. The result of F-Limer test
- Table 6. Results of Model (1) estimation
- Table 7. Results of the simultaneous estimation of models (4) and (5)
- Table 8. Mishkin test results related to abnormal accruals
- Table 9. Mishkin test results related to normal accruals
-
- Chan, K., Chan, L. K., Jegadeesh, N., & Lakonishok, J. (2006). Earnings quality and stock returns. Journal of Business, 79.
- Desai, H., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2004). Value-glamour and accruals mispricing: One anomaly or two? The Accounting Review, 79(2), 355-385.
- Dopuch, N., Seethamraju, C., & Xu, W. (2010). The pricing of accruals for profit and loss firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 34(4), 505- 516.
- Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295-327.
- Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 85-107.
- Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
- Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). The accrual anomaly: risk or mispricing? Management Science, 58(2), 320-335.
- Hribar, P., & Collins, D. W. (2002). Errors in estimating accruals: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 105-134.
- Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193-228.
- Li, Y., Niu, J., Zhang, R., & Largay, J. A. (2011). Earnings management and the accrual anomaly: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 22(3), 205-245.
- Mashruwala, C., Rajgopal, S., & Shevlin, T. (2006). Why is the accrual anomaly not arbitraged away? The role of idiosyncratic risk and transaction costs. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1), 3-33.
- Minskin, F. (1983). A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Ozkan, N., & Kayali, M. M. (2015). The accrual anomaly: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(2), 115-125.
- Palepu, K., Healy, P., & Bernard, V. (2000). Business Analysis and Valuation (Southwestern Publishing).
- Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370.
- Schipper, K. (1989). Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 3(4), 91-10.
- Scott, A., Sloan, R., Soliman, M., & Tuna, I. (2005). Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 437- 485.
- Sloan, R. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? (Digest summary). Accounting Review, 71(3), 289-315.
- Summers, S. L., & Sweeney, J. T. (1998). Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis. Accounting Review, 48, 131-146.
- Wu, J. G., Zhang, L., & Zhang, X. (2010). The q‐Theory Approach to Understanding the Accrual Anomaly. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), 177-223.
- Xie, H. (2001). The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 357- 373.