The nonlinear progressive water pricing policy in Tunisia: equity and efficiency
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(2).2017.02
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2017, Issue #2, pp. 17-27
- Cited by
- 840 Views
-
228 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Economic theory and recent empirical evidence show that nonlinear progressive water pricing policies are the most useful tool to reduce water demand in water stressed countries. The originality of our paper is to implement Pedroni (1999) panel cointegration tests, using databases on a breakdown of two consumption blocks (a lower and an upper block) from the Tunisian water regulator over 27 years. The results reveal that increasing block tariffs have been successful in managing scarce water in Tunisia. The authors observe that, in the long-run, proportion of subscribers in the upper water consumption block decreases when price increases, while in the lower block, which is composed essentially of low-income households characterized by inelastic water demand, proportion of subscribers is less elastic to price changes and still unchanged. This paper calls for the implementation of nonlinear progressive pricing to reduce demand by large consumers in order to promote efficiency in use and to promote the access of poor consumers to the resource in order to promote equity.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q25, Q56
-
References15
-
Tables6
-
Figures5
-
- Fig. 1. Proportion of consumers in the upper block (time on x-axis, “80” stands for 1980 and “00” for 2000; % of consumers in the block on the y-axis)
- Fig. 2. Proportion of consumers in the lower block (time on x-axis, “80” stands for 1980 and “00” for 2000; % of consumers in the block on the y-axis)
- Fig. 1A. Lower consumption block, yearly average values
- Fig. 2A. Upper consumption block (block 3 and 4), yearly average values
- Fig. 3A. Upper consumption block(block 5), yearly average values
-
- Table 1. Tariff of water distribution in Tunisia in 2007, in Tunisian dinars per m3
- Table 2. Fixed charges for water distribution in Tunisia in 2007, in Tunisian dinars per quarter
- Table 3. First generation panel unit roots tests
- Table 4. Pesaran (2007) panel unit root test
- Table 5. Pedroni (1999) cointegration tests
- Table 6. FMOLS estimation results
-
- Arbués, F., Garcia Valinas, M. A., and Martinez-Espineira, D. R. (2003). Estimation of residential water demand: a state of the art review. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(1), 81-102.
- Ayadi, M., Krishnakumar, J., and Matoussi, M. S. (2002). A Panel data analysis of residential water demand in presence of nonlinear progressive tariffs, cahiers du départementd’économétrie, University of Genève, 2002.06.
- Dalhuisen, J. M., Florax, M. R. de, Groot, H. L. F., and Nijkamp, P. (2003). Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: why empirical estimates differ? Land Economics, 79, 292-308.
- Im, K. S., Pesaran, H., and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
- Levin, A., Lin, C. F., et. Chu, J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
- Martinez-Espineira, R. (2007). An estimation of residential water demand using cointegration and error correction techniques. Journal of Applied Economics, 1, 161-184.
- Mansur, E. T., and Olmstead, S. (2012). The Value of Scarce Water: Measuring the Inefficiency of Municipal Regulations. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(3), 332-346.
- Nauges, C., and Whittington, D. (2010). Estimation of Water Demand in Developing Countries: An Overview. World Bank Research Observer, 25(2), 263-294.
- Nauges, C., and Thomas, A. (2003). Long-run study of residential water consumption. Environmental and resource Economics, 26, 25-43.
- Olmstead, S. (2010). The Economics of Managing Scarce Water Resource. Review ofenvironmental economics and policy, 4(2), 179-198.
- Olmstead, S., and Stavins, R. N. (2009). Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Water Conservation. Water Resources Research, 45(4), 1-10.
- Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogenous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653-670.
- Pesaran, H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
- Porcher, S. (2014). Efficiency and equity in two-part tariffs: the case of residential water rate. Applied Economics, 46, 539-555.
- Worthington, A. C., and Hoffman, M. (2008). An empirical survey of residential water demand modeling. Journal of Economic Survey, 22, 842-71.