The moderating effect of shareholder features on dividend disbursement: evidence from Indonesia
-
Received May 16, 2018;Accepted September 19, 2018;Published September 27, 2018
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-0117Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-7919
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.28
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2018, Issue #3, pp. 343-350
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by3 articlesJournal title: Financial InnovationArticle title: Effect of family control on corporate dividend policy of firms in PakistanDOI: 10.1186/s40854-019-0158-9Volume: 5 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2019Contributors: Imran Yousaf, Shoaib Ali, Arshad HassanJournal title: Question(s) de managementArticle title: La politique de dividendes : un outil de gouvernance en période de crises ?DOI: 10.3917/qdm.204.0045Volume: n° 30 / Issue: 4 / First page: 45 / Year: 2020Contributors: Lotfi Taleb, Béchir Ben LahouelJournal title: Investment Management and Financial InnovationsArticle title: The role of dividend yield as agency conflict determinant: case of IndonesiaDOI: 10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.17Volume: 17 / Issue: 1 / First page: 188 / Year: 2020Contributors: Novi Swandari Budiarso, Winston Pontoh
- 1015 Views
-
215 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The objective of this study is to give an empirical evidence of relationship between features of ownership structures and dividend disbursement in context of bird in the hand and catering theories. The study uses 241 listed firms as the sample, which were drawn from Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period from 2010 to 2015. Under condition that dividend policy is not moderated by ownership features, dividend policy for firms with multi-institutional, single institutional, and state are fit in context of bird in the hand theory and catering theory. Under condition that dividend policy is moderated by ownership features, this study finds that dividend policy for firms with state ownership is not fit both in context of bird in the hand theory and catering theory. Specifically, the study finds that firms with features of: (1) multi-institutional, single individual, and public; (2) multi-institutional, multi-individual, and public; and (3) single institutional, and public are fit with bird in the hand theory. Furthermore, this study finds that catering theory is not fit for firms with basic features of multi-institutional and state ownership, but it is fit for firms with features of single institutional, single individual, and public ownership.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G35, G32, G41
-
References28
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. The features of ownership structures
- Table 2. Testing of dividend policy by each basic feature of ownership structures
- Table 3. Theory implication for each features of ownership structures
-
- Aharony, J., & Swary, I. (1980). Quarterly dividend and earnings announcements and stockholders’ returns: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 35(1), 1-12.
- Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Pham, T. M., & Walter, T. S. (2011). The information content of cash dividend announcements in a unique environment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(3), 606-612.
- Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004a). A catering theory of dividends. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1125- 1165.
- Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004b). Appearing and disappearing dividends: the link to catering incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 271-288.
- Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-151.
- Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and “the bird in the hand” fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270.
- Bøhren, Ø., Josefsen, M. G., & Steen, P. E. (2012). Stakeholder conflicts and dividend policy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 2852-2864.
- Budiarso, N. S., & Pontoh, W. (2016). Firm’s dividend decision in Indonesia: cater or mature? Journal of Life Economics, 3(3), 53-66.
- Budiarso, N. S. (2017). Propensity to pay dividend: testing for life cycle and free cash flow theories. Journal of Accounting, Finance And Auditing Studies, 3(2), 1-15.
- Denis, D. J., & Osobov, I. (2008). Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 62-82.
- Dreman, D. N., & Lufkin, E. A. (2000). Investor overreaction: evidence that its basis is psychological. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(1), 61-75.
- Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.
- Farrukh, K., Irshad, S., Khakwani, M. S., Ishaque, S., & Ansari, N. (2017). Impact of dividend policy on shareholders wealth and firm performance in Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 4, 1-11.
- Gugler, K. (2003). Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation between dividends, R&D, and capital investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(7), 1297- 1321.
- Gugler, K., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2003). Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in Germany. European Economic Review, 47(4), 731-758.
- Hui, B., & Li, P. (2014). Does investor sentiment predict stock returns? The evidence from Chinese Stock Market. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 27(1), 130-143.
- La Porta, R., De Silanes, F. L., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1-33.
- Li, W., & Lie, E. (2006). Dividend changes and catering incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 293-308.
- Li, K., & Zhao, X. (2008). Asymmetric information and dividend policy. Financial Management, 37(4), 673-694.
- Lin, T. J., Chen, Y. P., & Tsai, H. F. (2017). The relationship among information asymmetry, dividend policy and ownership structure. Finance Research Letters, 20, 1-12.
- Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97-113.
- Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
- Ozuomba, C. N., Anichebe, A. S., & Okoye, P. V. C. (2016). The effect of dividend policies on wealth maximization – a study of some selected plcs. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1), 1-15.
- Polk, C., & Sapienza, P. (2009). The stock market and corporate investment: A test of catering theory. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 187-217.
- Pontoh, W. (2015). Signaling, bird in the hand, and catering effect in Indonesia. Journal of Life Economics, 2(3), 1-24.
- Reyna, J. M. S. M. (2017). Ownership structure and its effect on dividend policy in the Mexican context. Contaduría y Administración, 62, 1199-1213.
- Saerang, D. P. E., & Pontoh, W. (2016). The role of ownership on behavior of dividend payers. Journal of Life Economics, 3(4), 59-68.
- Wei, Z., Wu, S., Li, C., and Chen, W. (2011). Family control, institutional environment and cash dividend policy: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1-2), 29-46.
-
Factors affecting the dividend policy of non-financial joint-stock companies in Ukraine
Heorhiy Rohov , Oleh Kolodiziev , Nataliya Shulga , Mykhailo Krupka , Tetiana Riabovolyk doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.04Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 40-53 Views: 1881 Downloads: 315 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯDividend policy, as part of corporate governance, is largely dependent on the institutional environment in which companies operate. The study aims to determine factors affecting dividend policy in the conditions of the Ukrainian underdeveloped stock market, legal insecurity of minority shareholders, high cost and concentration of capital. For this purpose, hypotheses about the impact of a company’s financial state, size, business risk, and ownership structure on dividend payments were tested using a sample of 58 Ukrainian non-financial public joint-stock companies and applying Interactive tree classification techniques (C&RT). The resulting classification model for predicting dividend decisions correctly classifies 92.86% of companies that paid dividends and 93.3% of companies that did not. The findings, based on the classification tree and importance scale, prove the hypothesis that companies in which individuals and institutional investors have a controlling interest are more likely to pay dividends than other non-state companies. The financial indicators accurately classify only those firms that do not pay dividends, and business risk does not affect classification accuracy at all. The paper substantiates the ways of using the study findings for economic regulation, protection of minority shareholders’ rights, and proliferation of modern corporate governance practices.
-
Assessment of financial performance and the effect on dividend policy of the banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 24-39 Views: 1793 Downloads: 173 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study aims to determine the assessment of financial performance and the effect on dividend policy of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2014–2017. The assessment of the company’s financial performance is important. Results of the assessment will be consideration of financial performance for investors, one of them to predict the dividend policy. The prediction results will influence investors in making investment decisions. This study employs a quantitative approach. The assessment of financial performance is measured using variables of leverage, profitability and profit growth. They were analyzed using the multiple linear regression method. At the 0.05 significance level, the results of this study showed that the leverage has a negative and significant effect on dividend policy. Meanwhile, profitability and profit growth have no effect on dividend policy. In order to explain the influence between variables, the research is based on the theories underlying the dividend policy, namely the theory of residual dividends and smoothing theory. The results of this study support the residual dividend theory, that one of the dividend policies is determined by the company by considering the target capital structure and then distributing dividends with only the remaining profit.
-
The effects of managerial ownership, leverage, dividend policy in minimizing agency problem
Alni Rahmawati , M. Moeljadi , Djumahir , Sumiati doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.22Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 273-282 Views: 1671 Downloads: 307 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe research intends to minimize agency conflict through causality effects of managerial ownership, leverage, and dividend policy, where agency conflict is still interesting issue to discuss, as it concerns the principals’ and agents’ interests. The research covers 33 go-public manufacturers in Indonesia Stock Exchange. It involves 198 samples in the period 2010–2015. It applies saturation sampling and balanced panel data. For analysis model, it applies Granger bidirectional/simultaneity analysis, with variables of managerial ownership, leverage and dividend policy.The research shows that: 1) there is no bidirectional causality between managerial ownership and leverage (5%); 2) there is no bidirectional causality between managerial ownership and dividend policy (5%); 3) there is no bidirectional causality between leverage and dividend policy (10%).