The macroeconomic effects of climate policy: A Keynesian point of view
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.02
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2022, Issue #1, pp. 16-27
- Cited by
- 568 Views
-
182 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper analyzes the effects of introducing a corporate carbon tax on GDP and the effectiveness of this macroeconomic policy. The study is based on constructing a simple Keynesian model with flexible prices. It shows that the carbon tax can have a double beneficial effect on the economy in addition to its favorable effect on the environment: i.e., an increase in GDP and employment. The initial values (y = 100; C = 60; I = 18; G = 16; g(A) = 6) was used to simulate a positive shock of the carbon tax T, increasing from 1.75 to 1.9. The paper considers three different cases depending on the low (Case 1), medium (Case 2), or high (Case 3) sensitivity of the marginal propensity to consume in response to an increase in the prices of goods. In addition, case 4 is considered: stimulus policy associated with climate policy; and case 5 is: policy to increase nominal wages. The results show that the carbon tax can lead to an increase in prices. Although the tax does not excessively negatively affect consumption, it has a positive effect on GDP via the increase in green investments and the induced increase in public spending. Households are, therefore, not necessarily penalized because they benefit from the multiplier effects of the increase in public spending due to the introduction of the ecological tax. Furthermore, stimulus policy is even more effective when combined with an emissions tax.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E12, E62, Q52
-
References30
-
Tables1
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Effect of an increase in the carbon tax on the economy (Case 1)
- Figure 2. Effect of an increase in the carbon tax on the economy (Case 2)
- Figure 3. Effect of an increase in the carbon tax on the economy (Case 3)
- Figure 4. Increased public spending (with the budget deficit) while maintaining the carbon tax (Case 4)
- Figure 5. Increase in public spending (with the budget deficit) coupled with an increase in the carbon tax (Case 5)
-
- Table 1. Comparing results of the AS-AD model and the ‘Pure Keynesian’ model
-
- Allard-Prigent, C., Audenis, C., Berger, K., Carnot, N., Duchene, S., & Pesin, F. (2010). Présentation du modèle MESANGE - Modèle Économétrique de Simulation et d’Analyse Générale de l’Économie (Document de Travail). Ministère de l’économie, des finances et de l’industrie. (In French).
- Babiker, M. H., Reilly, J. M., Mayer, M., Eckaus, R. S., Wing, I. S., & Hyman, R. C. (2001). The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Revisions, Sensitivities and Comparison of Results (Report No. 71). MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
- Bovari, E., Giraud, G., & Isaac, F. (2018). Coping with Collapse: A Stock-Flow Consistent Monetary Macrodynamics of global warming. Ecological Economics, 147, 383-398.
- Cartelier, J. (1995). L’économie de Keynes. Paris: De Boeck Université. (In French).
- Cartelier, J. (2018). Money, Markets, Capital: The Case for a Monetary Analysis. New York: Routledge.
- Cordonnier, L., Van de Velde, F., & Desmarchelier, B. (2010). Croissance et répartition en présence d’investissements environnementaux non désirés. Développement Durable et Territoires, 1(3). (In French).
- Creel, J., Heyer, E., & Plane, M. (2011). Petit précis de politique budgétaire par tous les temps – Les multiplicateurs budgétaires au cours du cycle. Revue de l’OFCE, 116, 61-88. (In French).
- Decker, C., & Wohar, M. (2012). Substituability or Complementarity? Re-visiting Heyes’ IS-LM-EE Model. Ecological Economics, 74, 3-7.
- Fagnart, J.-F., & Germain, M. (2014). Macroéconomie du court terme et politique climatique: quelques leçons d’un modèle d’offre et demande globales. Recherches économiques de Louvain, 80, 31-60. (In French).
- Fontana, G., & Sawyer, M. (2013). Postkeynesian and Kaleckian thoughts on ecological macroeconomics. European Journal of Economics and Economic policies: Intervention, 10(2), 256-267.
- Haavelmo, T. (1945). Multiplier effects of a balanced budget. Econometrica, 13(4), 311-318.
- Hardt, L., & O’Neill, D. W. (2017). Ecological Macroeconomic Models: Assessing Current Developments. Ecological Economics, 134, 198-211.
- Heyes, A. (2000). A Proposal for the Greening of Textbook Macro: IS-LM-EE. Ecological Economics, 32(1), 1-7.
- Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth – Economics for a finite planet. London and New York: Routledge.
- Jackson, T. (2011). Societal transformations for a sustainable economy. Natural Resources Forum, 35(3), 155-164.
- Jackson, T., & Victor, P. (2019). Low Grow SFC: A stock-flow consistent ecological macroeconomic model for Canada (CUSP Working Paper No. 16). Guildford: University of Surrey.
- Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Cambridge University Press.
- Klein, G., & Simon, V. (2010). Le modèle MÉSANGE, nouvelle version réestimée en base 2000. Les Cahiers de la DG Trésor, 2, 34-42. (In French).
- Naqvi, A. (2015). Modeling Growth, Distribution, and the Environment in a Stock-Flow Consistent Framework (Policy Paper No. 18). WWWForEurope.
- Peirera, A. M., Peirera, R. M., & Rodrigues, P. G. (2016). A New Carbon Tax in Portugal: A Missed Opportunity to Achieve the Triple Dividend? Energy Policy, 93, 110-118.
- Piluso, N. (2007). The role of uncertainty in the unemployment theory of Keynes. Cahiers d’économie politique – Papers in Political Economy, 52, 105-114.
- Piluso, N. (2011). Chômage involontaire et rationnement du crédit: une relecture de la relation salaire-emploi. Economie Appliquée, 64(4), 69-86. (In French).
- Piluso, N. (2021). Les enseignements des modèles macroéconomiques écologiques des économistes keynésiens. Economie Appliquée, 2, 51-81. (In French).
- Rezai, A., & Stagl, S. (2016). Ecological macroeconomics: Introduction and review. Ecological Economics, 121, 181-185.
- Rezai, A., Foley, D. K., & Taylor, L. (2012). Global warming and economic externalities. Economic Theory, 49(2), 329-351.
- Scapecchi, P. (2010). L’évaluation des coûts macroéconomiques des politiques de reduction des émissions de GES. Les cahiers de la Direction Générale du Trésor, 5. (In French).
- Sim, N. C. S. (2006). Environmental Keynesian Macroeconomics: Some Further Discussion. Ecological Economics, 59(4), 401-405.
- Söderholm, P. (2007). Modelling the Economic Costs of Climate Policy (Research Report No. 14). Luleå University of Technology.
- Taylor, L., Rezai, A., & Foley, D. (2016). An integrated approach to climate change, income distribution, employment, and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 121, 196-205.
- Victor, P. A. (2012). Managing without Growth. Slower by Design, not Disaster. Edward Elgar.