The low fee entry strategy and first mover advantage in the ETF market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.24
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2019, Issue #2, pp. 281-294
- 1062 Views
-
138 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Academic literature struggles to explain investors’ attitude towards fees and expenses charged by mutual funds. In general, investors have been found to exhibit a puzzling lack of interest in this non-trivial component of their total return, raising questions of rationality of real-world investor behavior. An emergence of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), their rapid proliferation in the past decades and distinct features, such as more simple expense structure, present a valuable opportunity to contribute to the debate surrounding the pricing of funds. To better understand the expense policy/fund flows dynamics, the authors first test a conjecture that later entrants in the ETF markets face a disadvantage in competition for fund flows. Then, they test whether competitive pressure can be successfully overcome by lowering expenses charged to ETF investors. The results suggest that, though it is not necessary to be a first entrant in a fund category to enjoy competitive advantage, an earlier market entry is beneficial for attracting fund flows. It is also found that later entrants’ to the ETF market successfully use the strategy of reducing their expense ratios. Firms with lower net expense ratios obtain greater investment, as evidenced by greater capitalization and market share, supporting our intuition that investors may acknowledge the merits of low-cost ETFs.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G12
-
References24
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Number of US exchange-traded funds by year
- Table 2. Statistics of ETF providers by net asset value and the number of ETFs as of August 6, 2012
- Table 3. Comparison of Vanguard ETFs with first movers
- Table 4. Regression of net asset value (NAV) on FirstEntry, net expense ratio, age of fund, total NAV of fund family*
- Table 5. Percentage of change in adjusted market capitalization* one and two years after the entrance of low fee ETFs
- Table 6. Percentage of change in market share one and two years after the entrance of low fee ETFs
-
- Agapova, A. (2011). Conventional Mutual Index Funds versus Exchange Traded Funds. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2), 323-343.
- Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: gender, over-confidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
- Barber, B., Odean, T., & Zheng, L. (2005). Out of sight, out of mind: The effects of expenses on mutual fund flows. The Journal of Business, 78(6), 2095-2119.
- Capon, N., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Prince, R. A. (1996). An Individual Level Analysis of the Mutual Fund Investment Decision. Journal of Financial Services Research, 10(1), 59-82.
- Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
- Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2010). Why does the law of one price fail? An experiment on index mutual funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(4), 1405-1432.
- Christoffersen, S. E. K., & Musto, D. K. (2002). Demand curves and the pricing of money management. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(5), 1499-1524.
- De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets, Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
- Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Comer, G., & Li, K. (2002). Spiders: Where Are the Bugs? The Journal of Business, 75(3), 453-472.
- Gastineau, G. L. (2001). Exchange-Traded Funds: An Introduction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 27(3), 88-96.
- Gastineau, G. L. (2004). The Benchmark Index ETF Performance Problem. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(2), 96-103.
- Gil-Bazo, J., & Ruiz-Verdu, P. (2009). The relation between price and performance in the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2153-2183.
- Gruber, M. (1996). Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783-810.
- Hortaçsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2004). Product differentiation, search costs, and competition in the mutual fund industry: A case study of S&P 500 index funds. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 403-456.
- Investment Company Institute (2016). Investment Company Factbook.
- Ivkovic, Z., & Weisbenner, S. (2009). Individual investors mutual-fund flows. The Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 223-237.
- Jain, P. C., & Wu, J. S. (2000). Truth in mutual fund advertising: Evidence on future performance and flows. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 937-958.
- Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
- Kostovetsky, L. (2003). Index Mutual Funds and Exchange-Traded Funds. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 29(4), 80-92.
- Navone, M. (2012). Investors’ distraction and strategic repricing decisions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(5), 1291-1303.
- Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798.
- Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review, 89(5), 1279-1298.
- Salisbury, Ian. (July 30, 2012). As BlackRock’s Rivals Chip Away, ETF Fees Could Be Next to Fall. Wall Street Journal.
- Wilcox, R. T. (2003). Bargain hunting or star gazing? Investors’ preferences for stock mutual funds. The Journal of Business, 76(4), 645-664.