The intervening role of ambidexterity in the knowledge management project success connection

  • Received December 8, 2019;
    Accepted July 3, 2020;
    Published August 14, 2020
  • Author(s)
    Rawan Alshawabkeh
    ORCID ,
    Amani Abu Rumman
    ORCID ,
    Lina Al-Abbadi
    ORCID ,
    Ayman Abu-Rumman
    ORCID Researcher ID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.05
  • Article Info
    Volume 18 2020, Issue #3, pp. 56-66
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    14 articles
  • 1013 Views
  • 166 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Enhanced positive outcomes and benefits require project management to be integrated with knowledge management (KM) to induce ambidexterity and project success. To offer an empirical insight into this issue and advance the field of knowledge further, this research studies the mediating role of ambidexterity within the KM project success connection. The data collected from a sample of 350 senior people who have familiarity with relevant capital projects in the manufacturing companies in Jordan were analyzed using the algorithm of partial least squares (PLS) and bootstrapping techniques. The findings of the study show that KM is an integral aspect of project success, and it has a significant positive effect on project success, but KM, which does not induce ambidexterity, could not significantly enhance project success. KM can induce and stimulate enhanced project performance and benefits only when it induces ambidexterity. This implies that project success requires KM, given that KM allows organizations to possess exploitative and explorative capabilities simultaneously to tackle issues arising from the external environment. That this study covers only the manufacturing sector in Jordan, the research model can be replicated in other contexts to solidify the findings of the current study.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research model
    • Figure 2. Research measurement model
    • Figure 3. Structural model
    • Table 1. Internal consistency and convergent validity
    • Table 2. Discriminant Validity Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)
    • Table 3. Hypotheses testing
Related Articles

  • Knowledge management technology: human-computer interaction & cultural perspective on pattern of retrieval, organization, use, and sharing of information and knowledge

    Tereza Raquel Merlo doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.05
    Knowledge and Performance Management Volume 1, 2017         Issue #1         pp. 46-54 Views: 4943 Downloads: 1137 TO CITE

    Knowledge Management (KM) implementation is as much a challenge as it is a great opportunity for businesses worldwide in several sectors. The controversy over its worthwhile application persists among practitioners and scholars, with claims having arisen that business opportunities and performance are enhanced through KM adoption. Conversely, challenges regarding effective implementation of KM concerning individuals’ behaviors, beliefs, and practices prompt significant questioning regarding its complex basis: individual-technology-process-production. The purpose of this work is to shed light on some perspectives for the effective adoption of knowledge management technology, the consolidation of a favorable and aligned organizational culture, and patterns of use and retrieval of information in organizations. This study brings into focus the concept of knowledge management and technology, and culture in the organization through a systematic literature review and based on the researcher’s hypothesis and observations that successful KM implementation results from a clear understanding of its multidisciplinary, complex, and multifaceted process, which requires a methodical and strategic business practice concerning the application of technological tools, the establishment of a learning culture through shared vision of business’ and individuals’ needs, and consequential enhancement of processes and solutions. It concludes that investment in KM practice and the consolidation of a learning culture are correlated, reflecting a type of leadership that is favorable to the flow of information, generation, and sharing of knowledge (the intellectual capital) and optimization of decision making and business performance.

  • The resource-based view: a tool of key competency for competitive advantage

    Akwesi Assensoh-KoduaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.12
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #3         pp. 143-152 Views: 4822 Downloads: 1108 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The increasing turmoil in the external organizational setting or business environment has focused attention on capabilities and resources as the primary source of competitive advantage. Obviously, this statement points to the application of the resource-based view (RBV) of organizational management. Nevertheless, what constitutes RBV remains an illusion in many quarters of organizational management, as scholars have managed to put up their personal ideas, and managed to converge on phenomenon-driven theories, in addition to RBV. This paper reviews the concepts of RBV in light of knowledge management to highlight some critical pitfalls that might have eluded the research community on the subject matter of RBV. To this end, this paper’s educational value lies in the fact that it simplifies the concept of RBV to the new researcher in a fashion that is capable of appealing to his or her level. A cross-sectional qualitative research approach was employed in an effort aimed at understanding the role of RBV in creating a sustainable competitive advantage and key competencies. A total of 20 relevant articles were searched from different databases and search engines, including Scopus, EBSCO, ABI Inform, IEEE, PubMed, Science Direct, SABINET, IEEE, Bing, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The findings indicate that RBV plays an important role and assists organizations not only create, nurture, and maintain competitive advantage, but also understand the collective resources needed to compete favorably in a globalized and highly competitive market. With expert knowledge workers at its core to provide support for knowledge creation, sharing, and utilization, the RBV principles discussed in this paper promise to guarantee a methodological step geared towards the achievement of competitive advantage. It, therefore, makes an incremental contribution to the RBV to attain modest improvement in organizational settings.

  • The role of knowledge management in organizational performance: case study of University of Malang, Indonesia

    Andi Nu Graha , Achmad SudiroORCID , Armanu , Kusuma RatnawatiORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.20
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #1         pp. 230-243 Views: 2380 Downloads: 356 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The present study puts forward a model that examines variables of human resources management practices, organizational culture, knowledge management and organizational performance. By this model, it intends to explore the effects of human resources management practices and organizational culture on organizational performance. Particularly, it intends to find out their relationship with knowledge management as a mediator. The research applies SmartPLS for data analysis, with 163 respondents by means of saturation sampling technique. The results display several facts. First, both HRD practices and organizational culture have significant effects on knowledge management. Second, while knowledge management and organizational culture have a significant effect on organizational performance, HRD practices do not significantly affect organizational performance. It makes knowledge management only serve a partial mediation between human resources management practices and organizational performance, and serve a full mediation between organizational culture and organizational performance.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management