The influence of vocational lecturer’s work environment on innovative work behavior and creative self-efficiency

  • 364 Views
  • 109 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Lecturers have an essential role in achieving higher education goals. One of them is by being innovative in implementing learning. Currently, a severe problem for lecturers is developing innovative ideas and behavior. This study examines how the work environment of vocational lecturers influences innovative work behavior and self-efficacy. The sample comprised 361 vocational lecturers in East Java, Indonesia, who took part in an offline survey to collect the data. Using SmartPLS, the collected data were then examined. The results of the study show that transglobal leadership has a significant effect on creative self-efficacy with a t-statistic value of 6.893. Organizational culture also greatly influences innovative work behavior with a t-statistic of 5.507, and organizational culture significantly affects creative self-efficacy with a t-statistic of 2.048. In addition, creative self-efficacy significantly affects how innovative lecturers work with a t-statistic of 20.925. This study is relevant because it examines the relationship between transglobal leadership, organizational culture, creative self-efficacy, and innovative work behavior, which has not received much academic attention.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research model
    • Figure 2. Measurement of the outer model
    • Table 1. Definitions of variables
    • Table 2. Construct measurement
    • Table 3. R-squared value estimates
    • Table 4. Hypotheses results
    • Conceptualization
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih
    • Data curation
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Anna Widayani
    • Formal Analysis
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Ahmad Fauzi
    • Funding acquisition
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Ahmad Fauzi, Mahmudatul Himmah
    • Investigation
      Pudji Herijanto
    • Methodology
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih
    • Project administration
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Ahmad Fauzi, Mahmudatul Himmah
    • Resources
      Pudji Herijanto
    • Supervision
      Pudji Herijanto, Anna Widayani, Mahmudatul Himmah
    • Validation
      Pudji Herijanto, Anna Widayani
    • Visualization
      Pudji Herijanto
    • Writing – original draft
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih
    • Writing – review & editing
      Pudji Herijanto, Nilawati Fiernaningsih, Anna Widayani, Ahmad Fauzi, Mahmudatul Himmah
    • Software
      Anna Widayani