The equilibrium model of demand and supply at the Ukrainian Interbank Foreign Exchange Market: disclosure of problematic aspects
-
Author(s)Anzhela KuznyetsovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-7625
,
Nataliia Misiats
,
Olha KlishchukLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-1450
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(4).2017.03
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2017, Issue #4, pp. 31-43
- Cited by
- 954 Views
-
176 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This article is devoted to building of the equilibrium model between demand and supply on foreign currency at the Ukrainian Interbank Foreign Exchange Market (non-cash share). The authors discussed that appeared trade-offs are a product of established current foreign arrangement, administrative measures provided by the National Bank of Ukraine and range of fundamental variables, which are traditionally significant for Ukrainian economy. By means of FAVAR modeling model of demand and supply equlibrium on non-cash foreign currency was built on empirical data of Ukrainian Interbank Foreign Exchange Market, splitted into the periods, proposed by the authors. Next, it was discussed disconnection properties in the model and shown log-linearized specification of the one. The efficiency of fulfillment hypothesis on decointegrating of the fundamental variables' time series has been provided in form of critical statistics values. Also, instrument of GAP analysis of deviation from equilibrium state was proposed and the further analysis of a regulation style of monetary authority was provided. In conclusion, it was summarized that increased share of the cash out of the banks has significantly jeopardized the price stability in Ukraine and the NBU interventions would become more effective if the flexible foreign exchange rate will be accompanied with flexible regime of inflation targeting.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C32, F31, F41, F47
-
References19
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Influence of NBU intervention on demand of non-cash foreign currency in Ukraine, in ths dollars
- Figure 2. Influence of NBU intervention on supply of non-cash foreign currency in Ukraine, in ths dollars
- Figure 3. The difference between gap of demand and supply function at the UIFEM
-
- Table 1. The correlation matrix of the Ukrainian interbank market, external sector selected indicators within 2007–2016 years
- Table 2. Exchange rate arrangements and monetary policy framework in Ukraine during 2007–2016 years by the IMF rating
- Table 3. Properties of demand-supply model on non-cash foreign exchange currency in Ukraine
- Table 4. The models of the foreign currency exchange demand at the UIFEM (non-cash segment). The foreign currency exchange demand is the dependent variable
- Table 5. The models of the foreign currency exchange supply at the UIFEM (non-cash segment). The foreign currency exchange supply is the dependent variable
-
- Akihiro, Kubo (2017). The macroeconomic impact of foreign exchange intervention: An empirical study of Thailand. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49(May), 243-254.
- Alves, S. (2014). Lack of divine coincidence in New Keynesian models. Journal of Monetary Economics, 67, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/jmoneco.2014.07.002
- Ascari, G., Sbordone, A. (2013). The macroeconomics of trend inflation. Staff Reports 628. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
- Berganza, J. C., Broto, C. (2012). Flexible inflation targets, forex interventions and exchange rate volatility in emerging countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 428-444.
- Ca’Zorzi, M., Mućk, J., Rubaszek, M. (2016). Real Exchange Rate Forecasting and PPP: This Time the Random Walk Loses. Open Economies Review, 27(3), 585-609.
- Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
- Engel, C., & West, K. D. (2005). Exchange Rates and Fundamentals. Journal of Political Economy, 113(3), 485-517.
- Gang-Jin, Wang, Chi, Xie (2016) Tail dependence structure of the foreign exchange market: A network view. Expert Systems with Applications, 46(March), 164-179.
- International Monetary Fund. Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions (Washington. October 2016).
- Klishchuk, O. (2016). Enhancing of methods to avoid non–stationary in autoregressive models of free-floating hryvnyas exchange rate. Journal Association 1901 “SEPIKE”, 15(December), 91-96.
- Laplante, S., Nesbitt, W. (2017). The relation amog trapped cash, permanent earnings, and foreign cash. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44(June).
- Law on making ammendements to Decree of Board of the National Bank of Ukraine from 11.10.2008 No 319: Decree Board of the National Bank of Ukraine from 05.11.2008 No 353.
- Law on stabilizing situation on money and foreign exchange market of Ukraine: Decree of Board of the National Bank of Ukraine from 03.03.2016 No 140.
- Leonard, Onyiriuba (2016). Foreign Exchange Markets and Triggers for Bank Risk in Developing Economies. In Bank Risk Management in Developing Economies. Chapter 24. (pp. 459-485). Academic Press.
- Michelberger, P. S., Witte, J. H. (2016). Foreign exchange market microstructure and the WM/Reuters 4 pm fix. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 2(1), 26-41.
- Monetary and financial statistics of NBU.
- NBU external sector statistics.
- Yi David, Wang (2017). Convertibility restriction in China’s foreign exchange market and its impact on forward pricing. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50(15), 616-631.
- Zeileis, A. (2004). Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators. Journal of Statistical Software, 11(10), 1-17.
