The board of directors influence on the information quality of financial reporting through accounting conservatism – Empirical evidence on Vietnamese listed enterprises
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(1).2023.23
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #1, pp. 265-276
- Cited by
- 512 Views
-
254 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The information quality contained in financial reporting has practical implications for stakeholders. Accounting conservatism is a criterion that affects the authentication of the value of assets and liabilities related to the financial reporting of enterprises. The role of the board of directors is to supervise the information quality of an enterprise. The purpose of the paper is to examine how the board of directors influences the information quality of financial reporting through accounting conservatism. The survey sample includes 100 listed enterprises that have the highest capitalization in Vietnam’s stock market. Time series data taken for the last five years are published by enterprises from 2018 to 2022. The paper implements the quantitative method of ordinary least squares to test the hypotheses. The results explore that board size, board independence, and audit organization affect the information quality of financial reporting through accounting conservatism. Accordingly, board size has the strongest influence, and board independence has the weakest effect on the information quality of financial reporting through accounting conservatism. The research suggests some policies for Vietnamese listed enterprises to have appropriate regulations for the board of directors and strengthen control of the information quality of financial reporting.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, G41, M42
-
References42
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Correlation matrix
- Table 3. Regression
- Table 4. Variance inflation factor of the variables
- Table 5. Results of hypotheses
-
- Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2), 41-437.
- Ahmed, K., & Henry, D. (2012). Accounting conservatism and voluntary corporate governance mechanisms by Australian firms. Accounting & Finance, 52(3), 631-662.
- Alkurdi, A., Al-Nimer, M., & Dabaghia, M. (2017). Accounting conservatism and ownership structure effect: Evidence from industrial and financial Jordanian listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(2), 608-619.
- Al-Saidi, M. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Board on Accounting Conservatism in Kuwait. International Business Research, 13(9), 46-54.
- Al-Sraheen, D. A. O., Fadzil, F. H., & Ismail, S. S. B. S. (2014). The Influence of Corporate Ownership Structure and Board Members’ Skills on the Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from Non-Financial Listed Firms in Amman Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(1), 177-201.
- Alves, S. (2021). Accounting Conservatism and Board Characteristics: Portuguese Evidence. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), 1346-1362.
- Amran, N. A., & Manaf, K. B. (2014). Board INDEendence and accounting conservatism in Malaysian companies. International Conference on Accounting Studies, 164(1), 403-408.
- Anh, N. H., & Thuy, N. T. B. (2018). The degree of independence of the Board and the implementation of accounting conservatism in manufacturing companies listed on the Vietnamese stock market. Journal of Accounting & Auditing, 7, 16-21.
- Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
- Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37.
- Baysinger, B., & Butler, H. (1985). Corporate gorvernance and Board: Performance effects of changes in Boards Composition. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 1, 101-124.
- Beaver, W. H., & Ryan, S. G. (2000). Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book to market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(1), 127-148.
- Beekes, W., Pope, P., & Young, S. (2004). The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(1), 47-59.
- Chi, W., Liu, C., & Wang, T. (2009). What affects accounting conservatism: A corporate governance perspective. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 5(1), 47-59.
- Dang, N. H., & Tran, M. D. (2020). Impact of financial leverage on accounting conservatism application: the case of Vietnam. Custos eagronegocio online, 16(3), 137-158.
- Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donalson, L. (1997). Towards a Stewarship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 20-47.
- Deegan, C. (2004). Financial Accounting Theory. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 19-30.
- Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder return. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49-64.
- El-habashy, H. A. (2019). The effect of corporate governance attributes on accounting conservatism in Egypt. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(3), 1-18.
- Elshandidy, T., & Hassanein, A. (2014). Do IFRS and Board’ independence affect accounting conservatism? Applied Financial Economics, 24(16), 1091-1102.
- Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
- FASB. (2021). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
- Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows, and accruals: has financial reporting become more conservatives? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 287-320.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Andersom, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentical-Hall International, Inc.
- IASB. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. IFRS Foundation.
- Jarboui, A. (2013). An empirical examination of the relationship between board of director composition ownership structure and accounting conservatism. International Journal of Economics Finance and Management Sciences, 1(6), 273-284.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Lara, J. M., Osma, G. B., & Penalva, F. (2007). Board’ characteristics and conditional accounting conservatism: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 727-755.
- Lim, R. (2011). Are corporate governance attributes associated with accounting conservatism? Accounting & Finance, 51(4), 1007-1030.
- Mohammed, N. F., Ahmed, K., & Ji, X. (2017). Accounting conservatism. corporate governance and political connections. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(2), 228-318.
- Mrad, M. (2022). Accounting conservatism and corporate cross- listing: The mediating effect of the corporate governance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 1-24.
- Nasr, M. A., & Ntim, C. G. (2017). Corporate governance mechanisms and accounting conservatism: evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 80(4), 376-398.
- Nunnally, J. C., & Burnstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- OECD. (2021). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook.
- Rustiarini, N. W., Gama, A. W. S., & Desak, N. S. W. (2021). Board of Director Characteristics, Institutional Ownership, and Accounting Conservatism. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 24(2), 289-320.
- Sholikhah, Z., & Baroroh, N. (2021). The Roles of Capital Intensity in Moderating Managerial Ownership and Investment Opportunity Set (IOS) on Accounting Conservatism. Accounting Analysis Journal, 10(1), 25-31.
- Smallman, C. (2004). Exploring theoretical paradigm in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethnics, 78-94.
- Vietnam National Assembly (2015). Law on Accounting.
- Vietnam National Assembly. (2020). Law on Enterprises.
- Vietnamese Government. (2017). Decree 71/2017/NĐ-CP guidelines on corporate governance applicable to public companies.
- Vietnamese Government. (2022). Regulation 633/QĐ-TTg Approving the Strategy for Accounting and Auditing until 2030.
- Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part a: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 207-221.