Sustainability of funded pension schemes: A financial position perspective using options

  • Received December 10, 2020;
    Accepted July 27, 2021;
    Published October 25, 2021
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.10
  • Article Info
    Volume 18 2021, Issue #4, pp. 111-119
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
  • 491 Views
  • 166 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study offers in-depth knowledge of the socio-economic characteristics of funded pension projects. It is based on the financial position of pension market actors during the transition of the pension system to a more funded capitalized scheme, mainly through the option benefit model. This is possible due to the fact that the economy is not viewed as a single earning cohort. The study analytically demonstrates a socio-economic anomaly in the funded pension system, which is in favor of high-earning cohorts at the expense of low-earning cohorts. This anomaly is realized due to lack of insurance and exposure to financial and systemic risks. Furthermore, the anomaly might lead to the pension re-reform back to an unfunded scheme, mainly due to political pressure. A minimum pension guarantee was found to be a rebalance mechanism to this anomaly, which increases the probability of a sustainable pension scheme. Specifically, it is argued that implementing a guarantee with an intra-generational, risk-sharing mechanism is the most effective way to reduce the impact of this abnormality. Moreover, the paper shows the convergence process toward implementing a minimum pension guarantee in many countries that have capitalized their pension systems during the last three decades, in particular in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. The influence on the guarantee cost
    • Conceptualization
      Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río
    • Data curation
      Ishay Wolf
    • Formal Analysis
      Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río
    • Funding acquisition
      Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río
    • Investigation
      Ishay Wolf
    • Methodology
      Ishay Wolf, Lorena Caridad López del Río
    • Project administration
      Ishay Wolf
    • Resources
      Ishay Wolf
    • Writing – original draft
      Ishay Wolf
    • Validation
      Lorena Caridad López del Río
    • Writing – review & editing
      Lorena Caridad López del Río