Stabilization Pentagon Model: application in the management at macro- and micro-levels

  • Received June 15, 2017;
    Accepted July 29, 2017;
    Published September 18, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Oleksii Lyulyov
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Hanna Shvindina
    ORCID Researcher ID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(3).2017.04
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #3, pp. 42-52
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    31 articles
  • 1243 Views
  • 280 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The problem of instability of industries, clusters and states influences the countries’ economies. Unavoidable changes became an attribute of the strategic planning at every level. As a result, an effective tool is needed to evaluate stability at different levels in such a way that will make it possible to manage the changes. In this paper the concept of Macroeconomic Stabilization Pentagon (MSP) was analyzed for its applicability for the EU countries of low-an-middle-income economies including Ukraine. The data analysis brought new understanding of the assessment of the public policies’ effectiveness. The model has proven its efficiency not just in the sphere of public administration, but also for the micro level management. The authors proposed the Microeconomic Stabilization Pentagon to be implemented in the research at the level of enterprises

view full abstract hide full abstract
  • JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)
    E63, F63, C21, L20
  • References
    32
  • Tables
    2
  • Figures
    3
    • Figure 1. Macroeconomic Stabilization Pentagon (Kolodko, 1993)
    • Figure 2. Microeconomic Stabilization Pentagon (proposed)
    • Figure 3. Comparison of MSP Profiles of certain countries (based on our own calculations)
    • Table 1. The optional alternatives for the indices of the Pentagon Model t
    • Table 2. Sub-indices and the MSP index for the lower-middle-income economies of the EU countries for time period 2000–2015 (calculations based on Eurostat data)
    • Ahangari, A., Arman, A., and Saki, A. (2014). The estimation of Iran’s macroeconomics instability index. Management Science Letters, 4(5), 871-882.
    • Angle, H. L., and Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 1-14.
    • Astley, W. G., and Van de Ven, A. H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative science quarterly, 245-273.
    • Bhattacharjee, A., Higson, C., Holly, S., and Kattuman, P. (2009). Macroeconomic instability and business exit: Determinants of failures and acquisitions of UK firms. Economica, 76(301), 108- 131.
    • Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the nature of organizational effectiveness. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness, 13, 55.
    • Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. (2000). Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. The Quarterly journal of economics, 115(1), 147-180.
    • Dornbusch, R., and De Pablo, J. C. (1989). Debt and macroeconomic instability in Argentina. In Developing country debt and the world economy, 37-56. University of Chicago Press.
    • Djalilov, K., Lyeonov, S., Buriak, A. (2015). Comparative Studies of Risk, Concentration And Efficiency In Transition Economies. Risk governance and control: Financial markets and institutions, 5(4, 1), 177-186.
    • Fischer, S. (1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of monetary economics, 32(3), 485-512.
    • Fischer, S., and Modigliani, F. (1978). Towards an understanding of the real effects and costs of inflation. Review of World Economics, 114(4), 810-833.
    • Georgopoulos, B. S., and Tannenbaum, A. S. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22(5), 534-540.
    • Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., and Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439-448.
    • Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., and O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable development, 13(1), 38-52.
    • Hurduzeu, G., and Lazar, M. I. (2015). An assessment of economic stability under the new European economic governance. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(2), 301.
    • Ismihan, M., Metin-Ozcan, K., and Tansel, A. (2005). The role of macroeconomic instability in public and private capital accumulation and growth: the case of Turkey 1963–1999. Applied Economics, 37(2), 239-251.
    • Kalra, S. (2012) Leading Macroeconomic Indicators: Interna¬tional Experience in Calculating and International Experience in Calculating and Using these Indicators. Presentation for the Economic Committee of the National Assembly Hanoi, Hanoi, August 15, 2012.
    • Kolodko, G. W. (1993). Stabilization, recession and growth in a postsocialist economy. MOST: Most: Economic Journal on Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, 3(1), 3-38.
    • Lyulyov, O., Chortok, Y., Pimonenko, T., andBorovik, O. (2015). Ecological and Economic Evaluation of Transport System Functioning According To the Territory Sustainable Development. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 30(3), 1-10.
    • Luthans, F., Welsh, D. H., and Taylor III, L. A. (1988). A descriptive model of managerial effectiveness. Group and Organization Studies, 13(2), 148-162.
    • Mahoney, T. A., and Weitzel, W. (1969). Managerial models of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 357-365.
    • Matthews, J. R. (2011). Assessing organizational effectiveness: the role of performance measures. The Library Quarterly, January, 87-110.
    • Orphanides, A. (2004). Monetary policy rules, macroeconomic stability, and inflation: A view from the trenches. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 36(2), 151-175.
    • Quinn, R. E., and Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management science, 29(1), 33-51.
    • Sancak, C., and Laura, J. (2007) Growth in the Dominican Republic and Haiti: Why has the Grass Been Greener on One Side of Hispaniola. IMF Working Papers, March, 1-33.
    • Steers, R. M. (1975). Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 546-558.
    • Slav’yuk, R., Shkvarchuk, L., and Kondrat, I. (2017). Financial market imbalance: reasons and peculiarities of occurrence in Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(1-1), 227-235.
    • Sutherland, D., and Hoeller, P. (2014). Growth policies and macroeconomic stability. OECD Economic Policy Papers, (8), 3.
    • United Nations. Department of Economic. (2007). Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies. United Nations Publications.
    • Vasilyeva, T., Sysoyeva, L., Vysochyna, A. (2016). Formalization Of Factors That Are Affecting Stability Of Ukraine Banking System. Risk governance and control: financial markets and institutions, 6(4), 7-11
    • Venkatraman, N., and Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of management review, 11(4), 801-814.
    • Yehorycheva, S., Kolodiziev, O., and Prasolova, S. (2017). Actual problems of the capital stability management in the Ukraine’s banking system. Banks and Bank Systems, 12(2), 60-67.
    • Żuchowska, D. (2013). Assessment of the Central and Eastern Europe Economies in the Years 2007- 2010 Based on the Model of the Macroeconomic Stabilization Pentagon. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 8(4), 49-64.
Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management