Scoping research on sustainability performance from manufacturing industry sector
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.10
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #2, pp. 134-146
- Cited by
- 1535 Views
-
157 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Sustainability is a key area of concern for manufacturing firms’ long-term success. However, the manufacturing industry has not been fully conscious of the potential sustainable values across manufacturing system. There is a need to better understand how companies can improve sustainable value creation. Recent research and practices have shown that sustainable operations can be one way to create sustainable values (e.g. economic, environmental and social). This review article focuses on the available empirical studies on the impact of lean and sustainability practices on sustainable performance from 2000 to 2018 in the context of manufacturing firms. Integrating lean and sustainability practices into manufacturing system confrontы operations managers with paradoxical tensions of sustainability objectives. Theoretically having paradoxical mindset will help firms’ managers make sense of and responв to such paradoxical tensions. In the context of sustainable operations studies, the issue of paradoxical mindset has been given less emphasis. Therefore, through the lens of the paradox theory, this study has developed a new conceptual framework for future research to investigate how paradoxical mindset moderates the impact of lean and sustainability practices on the sustainable performance of manufacturing industry. This study may add to the understanding of the circumstances, under which lean and sustainability practices impact sustainable outcomes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, Q010, L60, L25, M11
-
References70
-
Tables2
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. Scoping review process
- Figure 2. The distributions of journal publications
- Figure 3. Sustainability antecedents distributions
- Figure 4. Country context
- Figure 5. Research trend
- Figure 6. Respondents managerial level context
-
- Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the scoping searches
- Table A1. The description of sustainability performance, antecedents, approaches, country context and managerial level
-
- Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakundarini, N., Raja Ghazilla, R. A., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 182-204.
- Antomarioni, S., Bevilacqua, M., & Ciarapica, F. E. (2018). More Sustainable Performances Through Lean Practices: A Case Study. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2018 – Proceedings, 1-8.
- Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
- Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane Update. Scoping the Scope of a Cochrane Review. Journal Public Health, 33(1), 147-150.
- Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 31-51.
- Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Ahmad, N. (2011). An integrated management systems approach to corporate sustainability. European Business Review, 23(4), 353-367.
- Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., Duarte, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). Influence of green and lean upstream supply chain management practices on business sustainability. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 753-765.
- Brisbois, B. W., Reschny, J., Fyfe, T. M., Harder, H. G., Parkes, M. W., Allison, S., Buse, C. G., Fumerton, R., & Oke, B. (2018). Mapping Research on Resource Extraction and Health: A Scoping Review. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(1), 250-259.
- Bulgacov, S., Ometto, M. P., & May, M. R. (2015). Differences in sustainability practices and stakeholder involvement. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(1), 149-160.
- Camuffo, A., De Stefano, F., & Paolino, C. (2017). Safety Reloaded: Lean Operations and High Involvement Work Practices for Sustainable Workplaces. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 245-259.
- CCEPP (1996). The Data Collection Checklist. New York: Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice Unit (CCEPP).
- Chambers, J. M. (1992). Data for models. In J. M. Chambers & T. J. Hastie (Eds.), Statistical Models in S (pp. 45-94). Wadsworth Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.
- Charles, E., Dorion, H., Andrea, E., Cesar, J., Guimar, F. De, Severo, E. A., … & Dorion, E. C. H. (2017). Cleaner production and environmental management as sustainable product innovation antecedents: A survey in Brazilian industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 87-97.
- Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Fynes, B., Wiengarten, F., & Lecuna, A. (2015). Internal lean practices and performance: The role of technological turbulence. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 157-171.
- Cherrafi, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Mishra, N., Ghobadian, A., & Elfezazi, S. (2018). Lean, Green Practices and Process Innovation: A Model for Green Supply Chain Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 206, 79-92.
- Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping Reviews: Time for Clarity in Definition, Methods, and Reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291-1294.
- Cooper, H. (2017). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Dafa’Alla, A. (2016). Review of the contribution and role of the manufacturing sector in the Sudanese economy. Paper presented at The critical role of Diaspora in international scientific cooperation with the country of origin: 3rd Diaspora International Conference, University Square Stratford (pp. 239-255). London, United Kingdom.
- Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the Scoping Study Methodology: A Large, Inter-Professional Team’s Experience with Arksey and O’malley’s Framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 48.
- de Giovanni, P. (2012). Do internal and external environmental management contribute to the triple bottom line? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(3), 265-290.
- El Baz, J., Frei, R., & Laguir, I. (2018). Reverse Supply Chain Practices in Developing Countries: The Case of Morocco. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 198-216.
- Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.
- Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up? Assessing the Sustainability of Business and CSR (pp. 1-16). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Earthscan.
- Eslami, S., Khalifah, Z., Mardani, A., & Streimikiene, D. (2018). Impact of non-economic factors on residents’ support for sustainable tourism development in Langkawi Island, Malaysia. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 181-197.
- Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., & Rahman, A. A. (2010). “Triple bottom line” as “sustainable corporate performance”: A proposition for the future. Sustainability, 2(5), 1345-1360.
- Franciosi, C., Iung, B., Miranda, S., & Riemma, S. (2018). Maintenance for Sustainability in the Industry 4.0 Context: A Scoping Literature Review. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 903-908.
- Fu, X., Guo, M., & Zhanwen, N. (2017). Applying the green Embedded lean production model in developing countries: A case study of china. Environmental Development, 24, 22-35.
- Gadenne, D., Mia, L., Sands, J., Winata, L., Hooi, G., & Sands, J. (2012). The influence of sustainability performance management practices on organisational sustainability performance. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 8(2), 210-235.
- Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241-255.
- Garbie, I. (2016). Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises: An Empirical Study. The Journal of Engineering Research, 13(1), 42-57.
- Garbie, I. H. (2015). Fundamental Requirements for Sustainability Practices and Implementation: An Analytical Modelling and Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 3(4).
- Gotschol, A., Giovanni, P. De, & Esposito, V. (2014). Is environmental management an economically sustainable business? Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 73-82.
- Gupta, S. S. S., Gupta, S. S. S., Dhamija, P., & Bag, S. (2018). Sustainability strategies in the Indian leather industry: an empirical analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(3), 797-814.
- Haddach, A., Ammari, M., & Laglaoui, A. (2016). Role of lean, environmental and social practices to increasing firm’s overall performance. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 7(2), 505-514.
- Hajmohammad, S., Vachon, S., Klassen, R. D., & Gavronski, I. (2013). Reprint of Lean management and supply management: Their role in green practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 86-93.
- Hart, S., & Milstein, M. (2003). Creating sustainable value. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56-69.
- Hofer, C., Eroglu, C., & Rossiter Hofer, A. (2012). The effect of lean production on financial performance: The mediating role of inventory leanness. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 242-253.
- Hong, P., Roh, J. J., & Rawski, G. (2012). Benchmarking sustainability practices: evidence from manufacturing firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(4), 634-648.
- Karnitis, G., & Karnitis, E. (2017). Sustainable growth of EU economies and Baltic context: Characteristics and modelling. Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 209-224.
- Kim, M., Sheu, C., & Yoon, J. (2018). Environmental Sustainability as a Source of Product Innovation: The Role of Governance Mechanisms in Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability, 10(7), 2238.
- King, A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 244-256.
- Larjow, E. (2018). Administrative Costs in Health Care-a Scoping Review. Health Policy, 122(11), 1240-1248.
- Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1-9.
- Lewis, M. A. (2000). Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(8), 959-978.
- Liang, S., Lenzen, M., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2018). Resource Footprints of Humanity. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 267-268.
- Longoni, A., & Cagliano, R. (2015). Cross-functional executive involvement and worker involvement in lean manufacturing and sustainability alignment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(9), 1332-1358.
- López-Gamero, M. D., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2009). The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: Competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3110-3121.
- Magon, R. B., Thomé, A. M. T., Ferrer, A. L. C., & Scavarda, L. F. (2018). Sustainability and performance in operations management research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 104-117.
- Marikina, M. (2018). The Impact of Ecological Regulations and Management on National Competitiveness in the Balkan States. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4), 120-135.
- Moore, J. E., Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J., & Straus, S. E. (2017). Developing a Comprehensive Definition of Sustainability. Implementation Science, 12(1), 110.
- Mukhtarova, K. S., Trifi Iova, A. A., & Zhidebekkyzy, A. (2016). Commercialization of Green Technologies: an Exploratory Literature Review. Journal of International Studies, 9(3), 75-87.
- Nawanir, G., Lim, K. T., & Othman, S. N. (2016). Lean manufacturing practices in Indonesian manufacturing firms: Are there business performance effects? International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(2), 149-170.
- Nour, A., Galal, N. M., & El-Kilany, K. S. (2017). Energy-Based Aggregate Production Planning for Porcelain Tableware Manufacturer in Egypt. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rabat, Morocco, April 11-13, 2017.
- Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Research Studies: Definitions and Why They Matter. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 44(2), 84.
- Petkeviciute, N., & Streimikiene, D. (2017). Gender and Sustainable Negotiation. Economics and Sociology, 10(2), 279-295.
- Ports, K. A., Holman, D. M., Guinn, A. S., Pampati, S., Dyer, K. E., Merrick, M. T., Lunsford, N. B., & Metzler, M. (2019). Adverse Childhood Experiences and the Presence of Cancer Risk Factors in Adulthood: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2005 to 2015. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 44, 81-96.
- Rajnoha, R., & Lesníková, P. (2016). Strategic Performance Management System and Corporate Sustainability Concept – Specific Parametres in Slovak Enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 107-124.
- Sajan, M. P., Shalij, P. R., Ramesh, A., & Biju Augustine, P. (2017). Lean manufacturing practices in Indian manufacturing SMEs and their effect on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(6), 772-793.
- Salisu, B., & Awang, S. R. (2018). Trait Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Self-Efficacy and Contextual Performance of Teacher-Leaders: A Research Model. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 12(1), 111-121.
- Sambasivan, M., Bah, S. M., & Ho, J. A. (2013). Making the case for operating “green”: Impact of environmental proactivity on multiple performance outcomes of Malaysian firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 69-82.
- Senanayake, B., Wickramasinghe, S. I., Eriksson, L., Smith, A. C., & Edirippulige, S. (2018). Telemedicine in the Correctional Setting: A Scoping Review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(10), 669-675.
- Sezen, B., & Çankaya, S. Y. (2013). Effects of Green Manufacturing and Eco-innovation on Sustainability Performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 154-163.
- Sezen, B., Karakadilar, I. S., & Buyukozkan, G. (2012). Proposition of a model for measuring adherence to lean practices: Applied to Turkish automotive part suppliers. International Journal of Production Research, 50(14), 3878-3894.
- United Nations (1999). Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistics Use, 1999. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, United Nations.
- Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: A Review of Research From Win-Wins and Trade-Offs to Paradoxes and Beyond. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 54-79.
- Wickramasinghe, V., & Wickramasinghe, G. L. D. (2017, December). Effects of HRM practices, lean production practices and lean duration on performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5192, 1-46.
- Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance : The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 569-582.
- Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., Liu, C., Lai, K. hung, & Pawar, K. S. (2015). The impact of integrated practices of lean, green, and social management systems on firm sustainability performance-evidence from Chinese fashion auto-parts suppliers. Sustainability, 7(4), 3838-3858.
- Yang, C., Lu, C., Jing, J., & Bernard, P. (2013). The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E, 55, 55-73.
- Zhan, Y., Tan, K. H., Ji, G., Chung, L., & Chiu, A. S. F. (2018). Green and lean sustainable development path in China: Guanxi, practices and performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 240-249.