Role of innovative work behavior of vocational lecturer in Indonesia
-
Author(s)Nilawati FiernaningsihLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-8416
,
Pudji HerijantoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-5105
,
Anna WidayaniLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1600-237X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.08
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2023, Issue #1, pp. 104-114
- 333 Views
-
77 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
One aspect that needs to be developed in work is competence. In this case, competence is knowledge, skills, and attitudes sufficient to meet needs, such as good job performance. One of the employee behaviors that has not been developed and improved is the behavior of innovation at work. This study aims to analyze the role of Vocational Lecturers’ innovative behavior. This study was conducted based on data about 1,494 lecturers from vocational higher education institutions in East Java, Indonesia (seven state polytechnics and two state community academies). Using the proportional random sampling method, the Slovin formula of 316 people was used. The questionnaire was conducted as through Google Forms, as a person by seeing research respondents, and by holding virtual meetings from March to April 2022. The collected data were processed using descriptive statistical analysis methods to determine the characteristics of the respondents and inferential statistics using the SmartPLS version 3.0 program. The results of this study indicate that organizational support and transglobal leadership characteristics significantly affect employee engagement, proactive personality, proactive work behavior, and performance. Transglobal leadership influences proactive personality and job engagement in positive and significant ways. Organizational support significantly and beneficially influences work engagement and proactive attitudes. Work engagement positively and meaningfully encourages innovative work behavior, with a path coefficient 0.22. The path coefficients of the relationship between inventive work style, proactive attitude, and employee performance are 0.55 and 0.617, respectively. In addition, job involvement has a statistically significant adverse effect on worker performance.
- Keywords
-
References55
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model
-
- Table 1. Outer loading
- Table 2. Composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha
- Table 3. R-square (R2) and predictive relevance (Q2) values
- Table 4. Hypothesis testing results on the direct effects
-
- Afsar, B. Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2021). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082-1109.
- Agistiawati, E., Asbari, M., Basuki, S., Yuwono, T., Chidir, G., Mustofa, Silitonga, N., Sutardi, D., & Novitasari, D. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Culture on Teacher Innovation Capability. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 3(3), 62-77.
- Akgunduz, Y., Adan Gök, Ö., & Alkan, C. (2020). The effects of rewards and proactive personality on turnover intentions and meaning of work in hotel businesses. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(2), 170-183.
- Asbari, M. (2020). Is Transformational Leadership Suitable for Future Organizational Needs? International Journal of Sociology, Policy and Law, 1(1), 51-55.
- Asbari, M., Novitasari, D., Purwanto, A., Fahmi, K., & Setiawan, T. (2021). Self-leadership to Innovation: The Role of Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(5), 21-36.
- Bapuji, H., Patel, C., Ertug, G., & Allen, D. G. (2020). Corona Crisis and Inequality: Why Management Research Needs a Societal Turn. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1205-1222.
- Baran, B. E., Shanock, L. R., & Miller, L. R. (2012). Advancing Organizational Support Theory into the Twenty-First Century World of Work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 123-147.
- Baranik, L. E., Roling, E. A., & Eby, L. T. (2010). Why does mentoring work? The role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 366-373.
- Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectation. Academic Press, New York.
- Bergeron, D. M., Schroeder, T. D., & Martinez, H. A. (2013). Proactive Personality at Work: Seeing More to Do and Doing More? Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 71-86.
- Blau, P. M. (1964) Exchange and power in social life. New York: J. Wiley.
- Budiadnyana, G. N., Nuryanti, Y., Johan, M., Napitupulu, B. B. J., & Jumiran, J. (2021). Rahasia Membangun Perilaku Inovatif Dosen: Dari Kepercayaan Interpersonal hingga Berbagi Pengetahuan [The Secret to Building Innovative Lecturer Behavior: From Interpersonal Trust to Knowledge Sharing]. Edumaspul – Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 327-348. (In Indonesian).
- Buil, I., Martínez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 64-75.
- Chen, X., & Wei, S. (2020). The impact of social media use for communication and social exchange relationship on employee performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(6), 1289-1314.
- Cheng, C.-Y., Jiang, D.-Y., Cheng, B.-S., Riley, J. H., & Jen, C.-K. (2015). When do subordinates commit to their supervisors? Different effects of perceived supervisor integrity and support on Chinese and American employees. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 81-97.
- Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., & Menon, S. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747-767.
- Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 63-75.
- Ferdinand, A. (2006). Metode Penelitian Manajemen [Management Research Methods]. Semarang: Universtas Dipoegoro. (In Indonesian).
- Fuller, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329-345.
- Fuller, J. B., Patterson, C. E. P., Hester, K., & Stringer, D. Y. (1996). A Quantitative Review of Research on Charismatic Leadership. Psychological Reports, 78(1), 271-287.
- Garg, S., & Dhar, R. (2017). Employee service innovative behavior: The roles of leader-member exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. International Journal of Manpower, 38(2), 242-258.
- Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS [Multivariate analysis application with the SPSS program]. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. (In Indonesian).
- Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2014). Partial Least Squares Konsep, Metode dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program WARPPLS 4.0 [Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications Using the WARPPLS 4.0 Program]. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. (In Indonesian).
- Groselj, M., Cerne, M., Penger, S., & Grah, B. (2020). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 677-706.
- Harwiki, W. (2016). The Impact of Servant Leadership on Organization Culture, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (O.C.B.) and Employee Performance in Women Cooperatives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 283-290.
- Heryanto, T. (2021). Program Pemeliharaan Karyawan Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Institusi [Employee Maintenance Program in Achieving Institutional Goals]. El-Ecosy: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam, 1(1), 89. (In Indonesian).
- Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a Special Issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129-145.
- Karatepe, O. M. (2013). High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: The mediation of work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 132-140.
- Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia [Human Resource Management]. Yogyakarta: Center for Academic Publishing Service. (In Indonesian).
- Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884.
- Liang, X., & Luo, J. (2016). Micro-lesson Design: A Typical Learning Activity to Develop Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ T.P.A.C.K. Framework. 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 259-263). Wuhan, China.
- Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(3), 3-30.
- Man, T. W., Lau, T., & Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123-142.
- Mangkunegara, A. A. (2005). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM [HR Performance Evaluation]. Jakarta: Tiga Serangkai. (In Indonesian).
- Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 80-101.
- Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657-683.
- Notoatmodjo, S. (2007). Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku [Health Promotion and Behavioral Science]. P.T. Rineka Cipta. (In Indonesian).
- Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University Students’ Perception of Video-Based Learning in Times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903-921.
- Peters, M. A. (2019). Global university rankings: Metrics, performance, governance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 5-13
- Pujiono, B., Setiawan, M., Sumiati, & Wijayanti, R. (2020). The effect of transglobal leadership and organizational culture on job performance – Inter-employee trust as Moderating Variable. International Journal of Public Leadership, 16(3), 319-335.
- Rivai, V., & Basri, A. F. M. (2005). Performance Appraisal: Sistem Yang Tepat Menilai Kinerja Pegawai Dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan [Performance Appraisal: The Right System for Assessing Employee Performance and Increasing Company Competitiveness]. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2019). Leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior: The role of creative process engagement, core self-evaluation, and domain knowledge. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 105-124.
- Sari, A. P., & Najmudin, N. (2021). Perceptions of Proactive Personality and Innovative Work Behavior During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Contemporary Business, 24(5), 162-170.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Short Questionnaire. A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
- Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in The Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
- Sharkey, L. D., Razi, N., Cooke, R. A., & Barge, P. A. (2012). Winning with Transglobal Leadership: How to Find and Develop Top Global Talent to Build World-Class Organizations. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms – An Experimental Analysis.
- Su, F., & Zhang, J. (2020). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(3), 1-12.
- Sulastri, S., Gistituati, N., Neviyarni, N., & Aimon, H. (2020). The Effect of Female’s Administrative Leadership on Employee Performance in Higher Education. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2019) (pp. 232-235).
- Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275-300.
- Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Astri, E., & Hariyati, H. (2019). Does intellectual capital matter in performance management system-organizational performance relationship? Experience of higher education institutions in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(4), 533-554.
- West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Eds.). (1990). Innovation at work. In Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3-13). Chichester: Wiley.
- Wibowo. (2013). Budaya Organisasi [Organizational culture]. P.T. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward A Theory of Organizational Creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-322.
- Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2014). Fostering innovative behaviour: the importance of employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 37-41.
-
The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement
Dheyaa Falih Bannay ,
Mohammed Jabbar Hadi ,
Ahmed Abdullah Amanah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.39
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 479-491 Views: 2437 Downloads: 1014 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWork creativity manifested in innovative workplace behavior (IWB) and employee work engagement is fundamental to maintaining firm’s sustainability and competitiveness. In this regard, this study investigates the supporting effect of innovative leadership on IWB and employee engagement by maximizing employee vigor, dedication, and absorption. The study data were collected using a questionnaire-based technique, and the questionnaires were administered to 150 respondents working in mobile phone companies in Southern and Central Iraq. The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and SmartPLS software. The study results revealed that inclusive leadership and work engagement were significantly related to IWB, and work engagement played a mediating role between inclusive leadership and IWB. The findings further indicated that inclusive leadership behaviors such as openness, accessibility, and availability motivated the subordinates to be engaged in IWB. To promote IWB, company leaders need to effectively engage their followers by taking pride and satisfaction in employee output, which might help employee work engagement and IWB.
-
The effect of leadership and organizational culture on employee performance that is educated by motivation (study on the implementation empowerment programs in Jayapura city)
Nansi Lidya Lolowang , Eka Afnan Troena , Atim Djazuli ,
Siti Aisjah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.23
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 268-277 Views: 2407 Downloads: 1129 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯVillages and sub-districts in Jayapura city are public organizations that provide service to the community. Villages and urban organizations require leadership, organizational culture and strong work motivation to support performance improvement. This research was conducted in 39 villages and sub-districts in the city of Jayapura. The population of this study was permanent employees in the villages and sub-districts in the city of Jayapura, which numbered 96 employees. All populations were chosen as research respondents, this research was census research. The analytical tool used in the research is Partial Least Square (PLS). The results of the study show that, first, direct leadership has no significant effect on employee performance, second, organizational culture has a significant effect on employee performance, third, leadership has a significant effect on work motivation, fourth, organizational culture has a significant effect on work motivation, fifth, work motivation has a significant effect on employee performance, sixth, work motivation is a perfect mediator of the influence of leadership on employee performance, seventh, work motivation as a partial mediator of the influence of organizational culture on employee performance.
-
The impact of human resource development practices on employee engagement and performance in Jordanian family restaurants
Amani Abu Rumman ,
Lina Al-Abbadi ,
Rawan Alshawabkeh
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.12
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 130-140 Views: 1988 Downloads: 1240 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯGiven the organizational positive outcomes of human resource development (HRD) practices like organizational effectiveness, sustainable competitive advantage, and organizational commitment, the current study was designed to detect the impact of HRD practices (employee training, employee empowerment, employee promotion) as independent variables on employee engagement and employee performance as dependent variables and to notify those who are interested. A quantitative descriptive-analytical method was adopted for the current research paper. Data were collected conveniently via a questionnaire from employees of family restaurants. Usable responses were analyzed using IBM SPSS and AMOS on the strength of structural equation modeling (SEM).
The current data identified employee training, employee empowerment, and employee promotion as key predictors of both employee engagement and employee performance. Employee empowerment has the highest impact on employee engagement, followed by employee promotion, while employee training has the highest effect on employee performance. Furthermore, employee engagement is positively related to employee performance.
