Research on management theory: A development review and bibliometric analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.28
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #2, pp. 335-347
- Cited by
- 1116 Views
-
2508 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
While the literature on management theory has been growing in recent years, there are no publications regarding the evolution and mapping of this scientific field. This study dwells on the issues related to management theories in the context of today’s research by identifying the most important lines of research, researchers, and the concentration of research. To explore the trends in the development of management theory, this study used bibliometric analysis. The search in the Web of Science database provided 5,825 documents (including articles, books, reviews, etc.). Methods of trend analysis, clusterization, and comparative analysis were used. The results show that a new direction of responsible management research is being formed – the organization’s operations and objectives must be balanced, and their implementation must be responsible. This study enriches management literature by providing new ideas related to future research tendencies. Moreover, it fleshes out the direction for developing management theory and outlines the most-cited works and authors, the research concentration in different countries, and leading journals. For scholars and practitioners, such structured data are an important source of relevant information in published papers and allows for the definition of research guidelines.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M14
-
References37
-
Tables4
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Evolution of management theories
- Figure 2. Continuation of management knowledge
- Figure 3. Research methodology
- Figure 4. Distribution of the number of documents by year
- Figure 5. Keyword co-occurrence network over the years
- Figure 6. Keyword co-occurrence network
- Figure 7. Fragment of author clusters
- Figure 8. Main journals publishing articles in the management theory field
-
- Table 1. Data collection protocol
- Table 2. The most-cited keywords
- Table 3. Authors with the largest number of publications
- Table 4. The most-cited publications
-
- Angelova, M., & Pastarmadzhieva, D. (2020). Development of bio-based economy: Entrepreneurial endeavors and innovation across Bulgarian wine industry. Journal of International Studies, 13(2), 149-162.
- Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Barnard, C. (1948). Organization and Management: Selected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Bilge, P., Badurdeen, F., Seliger, G., & Jawahir, I. S. (2014). Model-based approach for assessing a value creation to enhance sustainability in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 17, 106-111.
- Bite, P., & Konczos-Szombathelyi, M. (2020). Employer branding concept for small- and medium-sized family firms. Journal of International Studies, 13(3), 143-160.
- Bodrožić, Z., & Adler, P. S. (2018). The evolution of management models: A Neo-Schumpeterian theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 85-129.
- Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Cichocka, I., Krupa, J., & Mantaj, A. (2020). The consumer awareness and behaviour towards food packaging in Poland. Economics and Sociology, 13(2), 304-317.
- Da Silva, R. F., & de Souza, G. F. M. (2021). Mapping the literature on asset management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 10(1), 27-36.
- Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Esade, M. B., & McKelvey, B. (2010). Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: A complexity science bridge. The Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 415-433.
- Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et generale. Paris: Dunod. (In French).
- Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative Experience. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
- Follett, M. P. (1941). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. In H. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.). London: Pitman & Sons, Ltd.
- Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. In W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, & K. Richter (Eds.), Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance (pp. 173-178). Berlin: Springer.
- Gantt, H. L. (1912). Work, Wages and Profit. New York: Engineering Magazine.
- Gilbreth, F. B. (1911). Motion Study: A Method for Increasing the Efficiency of the Workman (Reprinted in Spriegel and Myers, 1953). New York: Van Nostand.
- Gilbreth, F. B., & Gilbreth, L. M. (1916). Fatigue Study: The Elimination of Humanity’s Greatest Unnecessary Waste; a First Step in Motion Study (Reprinted in Spriegel and Myers, 1953). New York: Sturgis and Myers.
- Gümüsay, A. A., & Amis, J. M. (2021). Contextual expertise and the development of organization and management theory. European Management Review, 18(1), 9-24.
- Haveman, H. A., Mahoney, J. T., & Mannix, E. (2020). The evolving science of organization: Theory matters. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 660-666.
- Herzberg, F. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley.
- Kessler, E. H. (2013). Encyclopedia of Management Theory. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Makowski, P. T. (2020). Optimizing concepts: Conceptual engineering in the field of management – the case of routines research. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 702-724.
- Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilisation. New York: Macmillan.
- McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Ozeliene, D. (2018). Problematic aspects encountered upon implementation of sustainable development. The Influence of Scientific Applied Research on the Quality of Modern Studies, 1(11/52), 52-62.
- Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.
- Rogers, G., Szomszor, M., & Adams, J. (2020). Sample size in bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 125, 777-794.
- Roshchyk, I., Oliinyk, O., Mishchuk, H., & Bilan, Y. (2022). IT Products, E-Commerce, and Growth: Analysis of Links in Emerging Market. Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(1), 209-227.
- Samoliuk, N., Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Mishchuk, V. (2022). Employer brand: key values influencing the intention to join a company. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 17(1), 61-72.
- Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
- Smirnova, J. (2020). Identification of features of a green organization based on bibliometric analysis. 11th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2020”. Vilnius, Lithuania.
- Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.
- Urbancová, H., & Vrabcová, P. (2020). Factors influencing the setting of educational processes in the context of age management and CSR. Economics and Sociology, 13(3), 218-229.
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.17.
- Witzel, M., & Warner, M. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists. New York: Oxford University Press.