Relationship between corporate governance and audit quality in the industry sector: Moderating role of firm performance

  • 78 Views
  • 23 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study explores the relevance of corporate governance mechanisms in determining audit quality, with a specific focus on the moderating role of firm performance in the Jordanian industrial sector. Audit quality is essential for ensuring transparency and accountability in financial reporting, making this analysis highly relevant for stakeholders aiming to strengthen corporate governance. The study sample included 64 manufacturing companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange for the study period (2014–2022), with a total of 474 firm-year observations. The regression analysis is used to investigate the study hypotheses, including the key variables related to corporate governance, board performance, and audit quality. The findings show that company size has a significant positive effect on audit quality. There is no significant impact of CEO duality, independent directors, and ownership concentration on audit quality within the Jordanian industrial sector. The R² value of 0.067 indicates that approximately 6.7% of the variance in audit quality is explained by the study variables, while the F-value of 6.633, with a significance level of 0.00, suggests that the overall model is statistically significant, even though the explanatory power is relatively low. The study shows that company size is important to improve audit quality; other governance mechanisms may not have the same impact in the Jordanian industrial sector.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 2. Pearson results
    • Table 3. Results for the first model
    • Table 4. Results for the second model
    • Conceptualization
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita
    • Data curation
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita
    • Formal Analysis
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita
    • Funding acquisition
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita, Nahed Habis Alrawashedh, Mohammad Ahmad Alqam
    • Investigation
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita, Nahed Habis Alrawashedh
    • Methodology
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita
    • Resources
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita, Mohammad Ahmad Alqam
    • Writing – original draft
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita
    • Writing – review & editing
      Mohammad Fawzi Shubita, Nahed Habis Alrawashedh, Mohammad Ahmad Alqam
    • Supervision
      Nahed Habis Alrawashedh, Mohammad Ahmad Alqam