Readiness of the education manager to provide the organizational development of institutions (based on the sociological research)
-
Author(s)Inna Semenets-OrlovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-7426
,
Alla KlochkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-2638
,
Svitlana NestulyaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-6647
,
Oleksandr MykhailychLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0353-7391
,
Vitaliy OmelyanenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0713-1444
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.11
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #3, pp. 132-142
- Cited by
- 930 Views
-
214 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article contains the analysis of scientific approaches to understanding of organizational development in the field of educational institutions management as a complex of successive educational changes. Scientific researches on the change of education managers’ behavior in the course of changes are presented.
Types of education managers attitude to changes and their quantitative expression were determined and revealed based on the data of an empirical research. Almost half of the surveyed education managers are represented by such types as “traditionalist” and “realist”, which indicates the insufficient orientation of education managers in introducing innovative changes in educational institutions. This indicates a low level of education managers’ readiness to provide the organizational development of educational institutions.
The results obtained can be used by the government in developing and implementing the programs for the professional development of education managers. The authors offer the most practical tools for implementing the concept of organizational development. It is proposed to distinguish between special requirements for both professional and personal qualities of education managers.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D04, D20, D23, І21
-
References34
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Readiness of educational system of Ukraine for introduction of changes
-
- Table 1. Level of formation of types of educational institutions managers according to general indicator (in % of the total number of respondents)
- Table 2. The levels of development of types of education managers’ attitude to changes (in % of the total number of respondents)
-
- Adizes, I. (2004). Management/Mismanagement Styles: how to identify a style and what to do about it. Santa Barbara: The Adizes Institute Publishing.
- Amanchukwu, R., Stanley, G., & Ololube, N. (2015). A Review of Leadership Theories, Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management. Management, 5(1), 6-14.
- Blake, R. & Mounton, J. (1985). The Managerial Grid III: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
- Burnes, B. (2015). Understanding Resistance to Change – Building on Coch and French. Journal of Change Management, 15(2), 92-116.
- Burnes, B., & Cooke, B. (2012). Kurt Lewin’s Field Theory: A Review and Re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 1-18.
- Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (2019). Principles of Educational Leadership & Management. London: SAGE.
- Cashman, K. (2008). Leadership from the Inside Out: Becoming a Leader for Life. San Francisco: Berret-roehler Publishers.
- Coch, L., & French, J. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512-532.
- Cole, M., Hill, D., McLaren, P., & Ricowski, G. (2001). Red chalk: On schooling capitalism and politics. Bridhton: Institute for Education Policy Studies.
- Connolly, M., James, C., & Fertig, M. (2017). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 504-519.
- Druker, P. (2003). Management in the Next Society. New York: Truman Talley Books.
- Farchi, T., & Tubin, D. (2018). Middle leaders in successful and less successful schools. School Leadership & Management, 39(3-4), 372-390.
- Ferraro, G., & Iovanella, A. (2017). Technology transfer in innovation networks. An empirical study of the Enterprise Europe Network. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 9, 1-14.
- Fraylinger, K., & Fischer, I. (2000). Managing Change in Organisation. Berlin.
- Gebert, D., & Rosenstiel, L. (1981). Organisationspsychologie: Person und Organisation. Kohlhammer: Stuttgart.
- Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional Intelligence. Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Gummings, T., & Worley, C. (2009). Organization Development and Change. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
- Holloway, J., Nielsen, A., & Saltmarsh, S. (2017). Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 538-555.
- Hura, T. (2018). Leadership Psychology in Business. Psychological Journal, 4(9), 138-151.
- Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change. Harvard: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Kotter, J., & Cohen, S. (2012). The Heart of Change. Harvard: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Kuczmarski, S. (2007). Apples and Square. Thinking differently about leadership. New York: Kaplan Publishing.
- Leavitt, H., & Lipman-Blumen, J. (2001). Groups: Seeding Them, Feeding Them, and Using Them to Ignite Your Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Omelyanenko, V., Semenets-Orlova, I., Khomeriki, O., Lyasota, L., & Medviedieva, Yu. (2018). Technology transfer management culture (education-based approach). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(3), 454-463.
- Ronen, I. (2019). Education leadership in the knowledge age “from a formal position to a formative perception” the case of learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 73-86.
- Salmi, J. (2009). The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
- Semenets-Orlova, I. (2017). Processual aspects of educational changes: empirical findings at institutional level. Advanced Education, 1(7), 64-67.
- Semenets-Orlova, I. (2018). Tendencies in reforming the educational system of modern Ukraine: national and regional aspects. Public management: collection, 2(12), 171-179.
- Senge, P. (2006). Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday: Random House.
- Sergiovanni, T., Burlingame, M., Coombs, F., & Thurston, P. (1999). Education governance and administration. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Shahrill, M. (2014). Exploring Educational Administration: The Relationship between Leadership and Management. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(1), 525-538.
- Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational Learning and School Change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613-642.
- Stalnaker, D. (2018, October 23). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Humans and Organizations.
- Tichy, N., & Cohen, E. (2002). The leadership engine: How winning companies build leader at every level. New York: Harper Business.
-
The growth strategies of a global pharmaceutical company: a case study of Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Limited
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 (cont.) pp. 248-259 Views: 2921 Downloads: 3158 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯGiven the rapid and sustained growth of Aspen over the past decade, the main aim of this study is to identify and analyze the growth strategies, adopted by Aspen over the period from 2004 to 2014. The research method used was a descriptive study through a single case study of Aspen by analyzing secondary data in the form of publicly available company reports and presentations, as well as financial results, issued between 2004 and 2014. The study finds that, guided by strategic and visionary leadership, Aspen adopted a number of growth strategies including (i) organic growth, as a key factor in creating incremental value for Aspen and its stakeholders, (ii) inorganic growth, in the form of carefully planned and well executed acquisitions, aligned to the Group strategy, (iii) extending territorial coverage through global expansion, particularly into emerging pharmaceutical countries, and (iv) ongoing investment in production capabilities as a means of achieving a strategic advantage. Despite the challenges of intense competition, restrictive legislation, pressure on medicine prices, currency volatility and market specific risks, Aspen has delivered double-digit earnings growth to its shareholders for 16 consecutive years.
-
The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement
Dheyaa Falih Bannay ,
Mohammed Jabbar Hadi ,
Ahmed Abdullah Amanah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.39
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 479-491 Views: 2532 Downloads: 1023 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWork creativity manifested in innovative workplace behavior (IWB) and employee work engagement is fundamental to maintaining firm’s sustainability and competitiveness. In this regard, this study investigates the supporting effect of innovative leadership on IWB and employee engagement by maximizing employee vigor, dedication, and absorption. The study data were collected using a questionnaire-based technique, and the questionnaires were administered to 150 respondents working in mobile phone companies in Southern and Central Iraq. The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and SmartPLS software. The study results revealed that inclusive leadership and work engagement were significantly related to IWB, and work engagement played a mediating role between inclusive leadership and IWB. The findings further indicated that inclusive leadership behaviors such as openness, accessibility, and availability motivated the subordinates to be engaged in IWB. To promote IWB, company leaders need to effectively engage their followers by taking pride and satisfaction in employee output, which might help employee work engagement and IWB.
-
The effect of leadership and organizational culture on employee performance that is educated by motivation (study on the implementation empowerment programs in Jayapura city)
Nansi Lidya Lolowang , Eka Afnan Troena , Atim Djazuli ,
Siti Aisjah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.23
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 268-277 Views: 2462 Downloads: 1136 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯVillages and sub-districts in Jayapura city are public organizations that provide service to the community. Villages and urban organizations require leadership, organizational culture and strong work motivation to support performance improvement. This research was conducted in 39 villages and sub-districts in the city of Jayapura. The population of this study was permanent employees in the villages and sub-districts in the city of Jayapura, which numbered 96 employees. All populations were chosen as research respondents, this research was census research. The analytical tool used in the research is Partial Least Square (PLS). The results of the study show that, first, direct leadership has no significant effect on employee performance, second, organizational culture has a significant effect on employee performance, third, leadership has a significant effect on work motivation, fourth, organizational culture has a significant effect on work motivation, fifth, work motivation has a significant effect on employee performance, sixth, work motivation is a perfect mediator of the influence of leadership on employee performance, seventh, work motivation as a partial mediator of the influence of organizational culture on employee performance.
