Problems and forecast of the development of the Russian fuel and energy complex: the factorial approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2-2).2017.07
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #2 (cont. 2), pp. 372-385
- 1081 Views
-
231 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Existing forecasts of Russian energy sector development have a number of general provisions and differ in approaches to their construction. The most realistic forecast is made within the framework of the Energy Strategy of Russia for the period up to 2035. However, the dynamism and high uncertainty of economic processes, international relations, domestic policy and the rapid growth of scientific and technical progress need a systematic correction of any forecast. The purpose of the article is to develop theoretical provisions and practical recommendations for making a forecast for the development of the Russian fuel and energy complex based on the application of the factor approach.
The forecasting results are used in the development of management decisions, therefore, the authors of the article take into account the influence of various factors while making the forecast, but they (factors) are all quantitatively commensurable. To make a reliable forecast, the internal environment of the research object is studied in detail, organizational and economic problems in the development of the Russian fuel and energy complex are revealed, and methods for their elimination are suggested. The external environment is also analyzed and trends in the development of world energy markets are revealed. To forecast the state of the fuel and energy complex, an integral indicator is chosen reflecting the level of its technical and economic development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L71, O33, E37
-
References38
-
Tables3
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Macroeconomic indicators of the fuel and energy complex of Russia in 2000–2016
- Figure 2. Matrix of factors for forecasting the development of the fuel and energy sector
- Figure 3. Performance issues of the fuel and energy complex of Russia
- Figure 4. The correlation share of R&D expenditures in GDP and the energy intensity of GDP in different countries
-
- Table 1. Factors determining the development of the fuel and energy complex of Russia
- Table 2. Initial data for the regression analysis
- Table 3. Key directions for the development of the fuel and energy complex of Russia
-
- Bildirici, Melike. (2016). Defense, Economic Growth and Energy Consumption in China. Procedia Economics and Finance, 38, 257-263.
- Bushuev, V. V. (2014). Jenergija i sud’ba Rossii. M.: Jenergija, 292 s.
- Bushuev, V. V., Gromov, A. I., Kurichev, N. K., Nikolaev, M. A., Solov’ev, D. A., Timatkov, V. V., & Chernikov, A. A. (2012). Jenergeticheskie istoki i posledstvija global’nogo krizisa 2010-h godov. Monografija. Moscow: Jenergija, 88 s.
- Demina, O. V., & Novickij, A. A. (2012). Jenergeticheskie rynki stran ATJeS: vozmozhnosti dlja Rossii. Prostranstvennaja Jekonomika, 3, 55-78.
- Dirk, Jan van de Ven, & Roger, Fouquet. (2017). Historical energy price shocks and their changing effects on the economy. Energy Economics, 62, 204-216.
- Doklad i prezentacija k vystuplenju zamestitelja Ministra Alekseja Tekslera na forume TJeK Rossii v XXI veke. (2014). Oficial’nyj sajt Ministerstva jenergetiki RF.
- Federal’nyj bjudzhet. Oficial’nyj sajt Ministerstva finansov RF.
- Galkina, A. A., Grushevenko, E. V., Grushevenko, D. A., Kulagin, V. A., & Sorokin, S. N. (2011). Prognoz do 2040 goda. Glavnye problemy i vyzovy dlja jenergetiki. Nezavisimaja gazeta.
- Glaz’ev, S. Ju. (2007). Strategija operezhajushhego razvitija rossijskoj jekonomiki v uslovijah global’nyh tehnologicheskih sdvigov. M.: NIR, 134 s.
- Glaz’ev, S. Ju. (2010). Strategija operezhajushhego razvitija rossijskoj jekonomiki v uslovijah global’nogo krizisa. M.: Jekonomika, 287 c.
- Glaz’ev, S. Ju., & Kharitonov, V. V. (2009). Nanotehnologii kak kljuchevoj faktor novogo tehnologicheskogo uklada v jekonomike. M.: Trovant, 304 s.
- Godovaja otchetnost’ Goskorporacii “Rosatom”. Oficial’nyj sajt Goskorporacii “Rosatom”.
- Gorshenin, V. (2010). Shestoj tehnologicheskij uklad: vyzovy dlja Rossii. Biznes-Kljuch, 3-4(40-41), 22-24.
- Ispolnenie Federal’nogo bjudzheta. Oficial’nyj sajt Kaznachejstva Rossii.
- Istorija rossijskoj jenergetiki. Oficial’nyj sajt Ministerstva jenergetiki RF.
- Ivanter, V. V., & Panfilov, V. S. (2011). Konec jekonomiki rosta ili smena paradigmy razvitija? Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 7, 594-600.
- Key World Energy Statistics. (2016). The official website of International Energy Agency.
- Kipnis, E. A. (2014). Tendencii razvitija mirovoj jenergetiki. Mezhdunarodnyj akademicheskij vestnik, 6(6), 60-62.
- Lapaeva, M. G., & Lapaeva, O. F. (2004). Osnovnye jetapy formirovanija i razvitija toplivno-jenergeticheskogo kompleksa. Vestnik OGU, 8, 4-12.
- Lin Zheng-Wei, Hsu Sam Ting- Hsin, Huang Chin-Sheng. (2014). Technical analysis and market efficiency: an empirical examination on energy markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(1), 189-199.
- Makarov, A. A., Mitrova, T. A., & Kulagin, V. A. (2012). Dolgosrochnyj prognoz razvitija jenergetiki mira i Rossii. Jekonomicheskij zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2, 172-203.
- Maslennikova, Ju. A. (2010). Sovremennye problemy jekonomiki i upravlenija neftegazovym proizvodstvom. Trudy Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta nefti i gaza im. I. M. Gubkina, 2, 144-151.
- Mercure, Jean-Francois, & Salas, Pablo (2013). On the global economic potentials and marginal costs of non-renewable resources and the price of energy commodities. Energy Policy, 63, 469-483.
- Mirkin, Ja. M. (2014). Neftjanaja lovushka. Prjamye investicii, 4(144), 18-21.
- Oficial’nyj sajt Vsemirnogo banka.
- Ostrouhova, N. G. (2015a). Obzor problem otechestvennogo toplivno-jenergeticheskogo kompleksa. Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social’no-jekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovanija, T. 1, 4(4), 138-148.
- Ostrouhova, N. G. (2015b). Sovremennoe stojanie i kljuchevye tendencii razvitija mirovyh jenergeticheskih rynkov: posledstvija dlja Rossii. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Social’no-jekonomicheskie nauki, 15(2), 23-35.
- Otchetnost’ PAO “Gazpom”. (2016). Oficial’nyj sajt PAO “Gazprom”.
- Otchetnost’ PAO “RusGidro”. Oficial’nyj sajt PAO “RusGidro”.
- Otchetnost’, prezentacii, godovye otchety PAO “NK “Rosneft’”. Oficial’nyj satj PAO “NK “Rosneft’”.
- Plakitkin, Ju. A. (2012). Mirovoe razvitie i zakonomernosti global’noj jenergetiki. Vestnik rossijskoj akademii estestvennyh nauk, 3, 3-10.
- Plakitkin, Ju. A. (2013). Ceny na neft’ – perspektiva padenija vozmozhna. Vestnik rossijskoj akademii estestvennyh nauk, 1, 52-57.
- Postaliuk, Mikhail, & Kwon, Gulnara. (2014). Evaluation of an innovative project of saving energy in housing and communal services. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(1), 70-76.
- Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik. Oficial’nyj sajt Federal’noj sluzhby gosudarstvennoj statistiki.
- Rybcev, V. V. (2011). Perehod k shestomu tehnologicheskomu ukladu kak mehanizm perehoda k innovacionnomu puti razvitija. Kreativnaja jekonomika, 4(52), 3-8.
- The Global Innovation Index. (2016). Winning with Global Innovation. The Global Innovation Index.
- Trifonov, Ju. V., & Letjagina, L. N. (2010). Innovacionnaja napravlennost’ razvitija rossijskoj jenergetiki. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 3(1), 245-248.
- Tsakalos, Ioannis, Samitas Aristeidis, & Kinias, Ioannis. (2015). Volatility spillovers be-tween energy market and international financial markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(2), 136-149.
-
Cognitive analytical tools for cost management of innovation activity
Svitlana Labunska
,
Robert Karaszewski ,
Olena Prokopishyna ,
Iegor Iermachenko
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.34
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 395-407 Views: 1209 Downloads: 191 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPromotion of innovations on the market is hampered in Ukraine by the lack of methodological approaches for analyzing the efficiency of innovative projects. The lack of appropriate methodology leads companies to refuse to innovate because of the uncertainty of final economic outcomes. The introduction of project based methods for innovation activity management allows, on the one hand, to reconcile strategic and operational objectives within the innovation process, innovation activity and general financial and economic activity of the enterprise, and on the other hand, to implement cognitive approaches to organization of company’s innovation management.
The research argues the possibilities of applying the canonical correlation method for structuring the causal links between the determined components of a company innovative capability, such as innovation potential, innovative business opportunities and system margin. As these components may be further assessed by quantitative indices, the method of regression analysis is also used to develop analytical tools for innovation management, which allow to reveal the interrelated impact of expenses on the results of innovation activity. The paper analyzes changes in a company innovative capability that can be provoked by increased material, depreciation, labor and information costs and discusses directions of interrelated changes. Practical testing of submitted proposals is realized based on the Ukrainian companies’ statements for 2012–2017. -
Prospects for the introduction of innovations by agricultural enterprises in Ukraine
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 53-63 Views: 936 Downloads: 164 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯInnovative processes in the agriculture of Ukraine have specific characteristics. Most enterprises require substantial investments to finance innovative development. The article highlights the factors that influence the development of innovative investment activity of agricultural companies and analyzes their innovative and investment potential. It systematizes a set of risks and threats inherent in innovative and investment activity of agricultural enterprises using SWOT-analysis, which helps determine its possibilities. It offers a matrix for selecting strategic alternatives of innovative development of agricultural enterprises, which makes it possible to link three vectors of the innovative and investment activity: the level of innovative activity of enterprises, the scope of their activities, the most appropriate strategies for further development.
-
The innovative activity of enterprises and national economy growth: Ukraine, Poland
In the contemporary world, the sustainable development of national economies is impossible without the timely and high-quality implementation of innovation. The prompt use of innovations is considered to be the key to obtaining and maintaining both new and existing competitive advantages of both individual enterprises and the economy in general. This study aims to determine the dependence of national economic growth (based on the example of Ukraine and Poland) on the innovative activities of enterprises and innovative policies of governments, as well as the development of the improvement offers concerning the innovative policy of Ukraine based on international experience. The impact of innovation indicators on the level of GDP per capita in Ukraine and Poland over the period from 2000 to 2018 has been studied in the article. The most important factors of influence on the GDP per capita, through multivariate statistical analysis and regression analysis, were identified from the list of indicators of innovation activity, and the regression equation was constructed. For Ukraine, such factors are the “innovativeness of enterprises” (that explains the 34.19% of total dispersion), the “innovative inputs” (that explains the 17.11% of dispersion) factors and factor of “financing and implementation of innovations” (that explains 27.8% of the total dispersion). For Poland, the factor of “innovative activity” explains 44.35% of dispersion, and the factor of “innovative actions” explains 38.47% of total dispersion. Moreover, the suggestions involving innovation policy development of Ukraine are provided.
