Pragmatic model for sustainable energy policy: Networking between the government and key players in Bahrain
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.33
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #1, pp. 387-396
- Cited by
- 865 Views
-
336 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
To fill the current literature gap, this paper strives to empirically determine the networking process between the government of Bahrain and the key players in the formulation and implementation of sustainable energy policy. The literature review divulges that policy network approach represents a useful tool for the analysis of public policy, since this approach permits a thorough explanation of the interaction between the network’s members. A questionnaire was distributed to key decision-makers involved in the elaboration of sustainable energy policy in Bahrain. The results of this paper revealed that the government of Bahrain has adopted successful policies of sustainable energy in reaching the intended results. Nevertheless, the current structure of networking might be described as a “Clientelist Network”. This paper proposed a pragmatic model for sustainable energy policy to reinforce the networking process between the government and the key players into a rational approach of “Pluralistic networks”. In this network, formal associations have to be established to embrace the industry, energy and environmental sectors. Accordingly, this type of networking will ensure direct and strong frequent ties. Also, this pluralistic network will provide further comparative advantages in terms of the power of control over resources and the flow of information among all key actors.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q38, Q48
-
References52
-
Tables0
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. A pragmatic model for sustainable energy policy: Networking between the government of Bahrain and key players
-
- Atkinson, M., & Coleman, W. (1992). Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 5(2) 154-180.
- Atkinson, M., & Coleman, W. (1996). Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problems of Governance. In L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, & D. Laycock, Policy Studies in Canada: The State of the Art (pp. 193-217). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Börzel, T. (1998). Organizing Babylon: on the Different Conception of Policy Networks. Public Administration, 76(2) 253-273.
- Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- EWA. (n.d.).
- From Regional Pioneer to Global Contender – Our Vision – the Economic Vison 2030 for Bahrain. (n.d.).
- Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6) 1360-1380.
- Greer, A. (2002). Policy Networks and Policy Change in Organic Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis of The UK and Ireland. Public Administrations, 80(3) 453-473.
- Howlett, M. (2001). Managing the ‘Hollow State’: procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4) 412-431.
- Howlett, M., McConnell, A., & Perl, A. (2015). Weaving the fabric of public policies: Comparing and integrating contemporary frameworks for the study of policy processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3) 273-289.
- Katzenstein, P. (1978). Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Kenis, P., & Raab, J. (2003). What Do Policy Networks Do? Paper presented in the conference Democratic Network Governance. May 22-23, 2003. Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (1991). Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds), Policy Networks: empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations (pp. 25-59). Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
- Kickert, J. M., Walter, Erik-Hans Klijn, & Joop F. M. Koppenjan (Eds). (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.
- Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Oxon: Routledge.
- Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public Management and Public Networks: foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2), 135-158.
- Klijn, E.-H. (1996). Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes In Complex Networks: A Theoretical Examination of the Concept Policy Network and Its Problems. Administration & Society, 28(1) 90-119.
- Knoepfel, P., & Kissling-Näf, I. (1998). Social learning in policy networks. Policy & Politics, 26(3) 343-367.
- Knoke, D., Pappip, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (Ed.) (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kooiman, J. (ed.) (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage.
- Koppenjian, J. F. M., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
- Laforte, D. (1997). Les pouvoirs et la discrétion des fonctionnaires. In M. Charih & A. Daniels (Eds), New Public Management and Public Administration in Canada: Nouveau management public et administration publique au Canada/ Nouveau management public et administration publique au Canada (pp. 165-179). Toronto: Institut d’administration publique du Canada et ENAP.
- Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1989). Policy networks of the organizational state: Collective action in the national energy and health domains. In R. Perrucci & H. R. Potter (Eds), Networks of power: Organizational actors at the national, corporate, and community levels (pp. 17-56). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Legalés, P., & Thatcher, M. (1995). Les Réseaux de Politique Publique: Débat autour des policy networks. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
- Lemieux, V. (1999). Les réseaux d’acteurs sociaux. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
- Lemieux, V. (2000). À quoi servent les réseaux sociaux? Sainte-Foy, Québec: Éditions de l’IQRC.
- Lemieux, V. (2002). L’étude des politiques publiques: les acteurs et leur pouvoir (2e éd.). Québec, Canada: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Lemieux, V., & Ouimet, M. (2004). L’analyse structurale des réseaux sociaux. Québec, Canada: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the Future of Teacher Development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3) 221-227.
- Marsh, D. (Ed.) (1998). Comparing Policy Networks. Open University Press.
- Milward, B. (1993). The Hollow State: Private Provision of Public Services. In H. Ingram & S. Rathgeb Smith (Eds) (pp. 222-237), Public Policy for democracy. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution.
- Milward, B. (2000). Governing the Hollow State. Journal of Public Administration research and Theory, 10(2) 359-379.
- Muller, P., & Surel, Y. (1998). Analyse des politiques publiques. Paris: Edition Montchrestein.
- National Oil & Gas Authority. (n.d.).
- Ouimet, M., & Lemieux, V. (1999). Les réseaux de politique publique : un bilan critique et une voie de formalisation. Rapport de Recherche au conseil de recherche en sciences humaines du Canada (CRSH). Canada: Université de Montréal, Polarité.
- Pemberton, H. (2000). Policy networks and policy learning UK economic policy in the 1960s and 1970s. Public Administration, 78(4) 771-792.
- Peters, G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2) 223-243.
- Rhodes, R. (1981). Control and Power in Central-Local Relations. Aldershot: Gower.
- Rhodes, R. (1986). The National World of Local Government. London: George Aleen & Unwin.
- Rhodes, R. (1994). The Hollowing out of The State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service. The Political Quarterly, 65(2) 138-151.
- Rhodes, R. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4) 652-667.
- Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Rhodes, R., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1/2) 181-205.
- Richardson, J., & Jordan, G. (1979). Governing Under Pressure: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
- Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Schneider, V. (1992). The structure of policy networks: A comparison of the ‘chemicals control’ and ‘telecommunications’ policy domains in Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1-2), 109-129.
- SEU. (2017, January). The Kingdom of Bahrain National Energy Efficiency Action Plan (NEEAP) (p. 32).
- SEU. (2018, April 22). The Kingdom of Bahrain Sustainable Energy Policies and Initiatives, Water and Energy Sustainable Innovation and Industry – WEII 2018, 6. University of Bahrain.
- SEU. (n.d.). Key Initiatives.
- SEU. (n.d. a). About.
- Walker, J. (1974). The Diffusion of Knowledge and Policy change: Toward a Theory of Agenda Setting. Institute of Public Policy Studies discussion paper. University of Michigan.
- Walker, J. (1977). Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection. British Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 423-445.