Political connection status decisions and benefits for firms experiencing financial difficulties in emerging markets
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.14
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #3, pp. 164-177
- Cited by
- 471 Views
-
142 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
There is relatively little research exploring the benefits of political connection status decisions for firms experiencing financial difficulties in emerging markets. This paper investigates financially distressed firms that benefit from their political connection status in Indonesia. This study uses three measurements of financial distress as the dependent variables: Altman Z-score, negative working capital, and interest coverage ratio. Firm size, profitability, liquidity, leverage, and operating cash flow are independent variables. Quarterly data for the period from 2012 to 2018 from 327 non-financial companies were obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. To analyze the relationship between financially distressed companies and decisions on the status of political connections as supporters or opponents, the random effects probit model (REPM) was used. The results show that firms with political status as opposition to the government have a strong positive correlation with experiencing financial difficulties. Meanwhile, companies with political connections as government supporters have a strong negative correlation. Companies with politically connected status as opposition experience financial difficulties in terms of negative working capital and interest coverage ratios. Then, debt financing was not found to be a significant problem for financially distressed companies with a political support status of the government. There are indications that they have benefited from political connections, such as more accessible debt financing.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, G33, G38
-
References64
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Model 1, random effects probit model, dependent variable: Altman Z-Score (ALTMAN)
- Table 3. Model 2, random effects probit model, dependent variable: negative networking capital (NWC)
- Table 4. Model 3, random effects probit model, dependent variable: interest coverage ratio (NICR)
-
- Abelson, M. A., & Baysinger, B. D. (1984). Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 331-341.
- Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
- Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2010). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy: Predict and Avoid Bankruptcy: Analyze and Invest in Distressed Debt (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Altman, E. I., & Narayanan, P. (1997). An international survey of business failure classification models. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 6(2), 1-57.
- Amendola, A., Restaino, M., & Sensini, L. (2015). An analysis of the determinants of financial distress in Italy: A competing risk approach. International Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 33-41.
- Asquith, P., Gertner, R., & Scharfstein, D. (1994). Anatomy of Financial Distress: An Examination of Junk-Bond Issuer. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 625-658.
- Balcaen, S., & Ooghe, H. (2006). 35 years of studies on business failure: an overview of classic statistical methodologies and their related problems. The British Accounting Review, 38(1), 63-93.
- Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failures. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71-111.
- Bellovary, J., Giacomino, D., & Akers, M. (2007). A review of bankruptcy prediction studies: 1930 to present. Journal of Financial Education, 33, 1-42.
- Bliss, M. A., & Gul, F. A. (2012). Political connection and cost of debt: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(5), 1520-1527.
- Bliss, M. A., Gul, F. A., & Majid, A. (2011). Do political connections affect the role of independent audit committees and CEO duality? Some evidence from Malaysian audit pricing. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 7(2), 82-98.
- Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 541-559.
- Butler, J. S., & Moffitt, R. (1982). A computationally efficient quadrature procedure for the one-factor multinomial probit model. Econometrica, 50(3), 761-764.
- Capron, L., & Chatain, O. (2008). Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 97-121.
- Chaney, P., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1-2), 58-76.
- Chen, C. J. P., Ding, Y., & Kim, C. (2010). High-level Politically Connected Firms, Corruption, and Analyst Forecast Accuracy Around the World. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1505-1524.
- Cheng, C. L., Hsu, C. S., & Kung, F. H. (2015). Political connections, managerial incentives, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(4), 441-465.
- Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554-550.
- Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
- DeFond, M., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 145-176.
- Ding, S., Jia, C., Wilson, C., & Wu, Z. (2015). Political connections and agency conflicts: The roles of owner and manager political influence on executive compensation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 45(2), 407-434.
- Duchin, R., & Sosyura, D. (2012). The politics of government investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1), 24-48.
- Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 369-386.
- Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905-928.
- Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597-2635.
- Fan, P.-H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330-357.
- Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095-1102.
- Ghazali, A. W., Shafie, N. A., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2015). Earnings Management: An Analysis of Opportunistic Behaviour, Monitoring Mechanism and Financial Distress. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 190-201.
- Gilson, S. (1989). Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 241-262.
- Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331-2360.
- Gomez, E. T., & Jomo, K. S. (1997). Malaysia’s political economy: Politics, patronage, and profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., & Saffar, W. (2014). Auditor Choice in Politically Connected Firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 107-162.
- Habib, A., & Muhammadi, A. H. (2018). Political connections and audit report lag: Indonesian evidence. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 26(1), 59-80.
- Habib, A., Jiang, H., & Muhammadi, A. H. (2017). Political Connections and Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 52(1), 45-63.
- Habib, A., Uddin Bhuiyan, B., & Islam, A. (2013). Financial distress, earnings management and market pricing of accruals during the global financial crisis. Managerial Finance, 39(2), 155-180.
- Harymawan, I., & Nowland, J. (2016). Political connections and earnings quality: How connected firms respond to changes in political stability and government effectiveness? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24(4), 339-356.
- Heckman, J. J. (1981). The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (pp. 114-178). MIT Press.
- Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825-842.
- Hofer, C. W. (1980). Turnaround Strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 1(1), 19-31.
- Houston, J. F., Jiang, L., Lin, C., & Ma, Y. (2014). Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 193-243.
- Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 351-382.
- Joni, J., Ahmed, K., & Hamilton, J. (2020). Politically connected boards, family and business group affiliations, and cost of capital: Evidence from Indonesia. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100878.
- Keim, G. D., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1986). Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 828-843.
- Khan, A., Mihret, D. G., & Muttakin, B. (2016). Corporate political connections, agency costs and audit quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24(4), 357-374.
- Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371-1411.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000a). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1-33.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000b). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1/2), 3-27.
- Laitinen, E. K., & Suvas, A. (2016). Financial distress prediction in an international context: Moderating effects of Hofstede’s original cultural dimensions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 98-118.
- Lawton, T., McGuire, S., & Rajwani, T. (2013). Corporate Political Activity: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 86-105.
- Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 411-439.
- Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 559-578.
- Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283-299.
- Liberty, S. E., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Labor Union Contract Negotiations and Accounting Choices. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 692-712.
- McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D. D., & Cory, K. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: an extension of the resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 707-724.
- Mselmi, N., Lahiani, A., & Hamza, T. (2017). Financial distress prediction: The case of French small and medium-sized firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 50, 67-80.
- Ooghe, H., & De Prijcker, S. (2008). Failure processes and causes of company bankruptcy: a typology. Management Decision, 46(2), 223-242.
- Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial Distress and Corporate Performance. Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015-1040.
- Otchere, I., Senbet, L. W., & Zhu, P. (2020). Does political connection distort competition and encourage corporate risk taking? International evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 55, 21-42.
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
- Platt, H. D., & Platt, M. B. (2006). Understanding Differences Between Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. Review of Applied Economics, 2(2), 141-157.
- Polak, P., Masquelier, F., & Michalski, G. (2018). Towards Treasury 4.0/The evolving role of corporate treasury management for 2020. Journal of Contemporary Management, 23(2), 189-197.
- Tee, C. (2018). Political connections, institutional monitoring and the cost of debt: evidence from Malaysian firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 14(2), 210-229.
- Whitaker, R. (1999). The Early Stage of Financial Distress. Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(2), 123-133.
- Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2012). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 277-300.
-
An application of Altman Z-score model to analyze the bankruptcy risk: cases of multidisciplinary enterprises in Vietnam
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #4 pp. 181-191 Views: 2287 Downloads: 2516 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study applied Altman Z-score model to assess the bankruptcy risk of a set of multidisciplinary enterprises of various types, mainly small and medium enterprises, with data taken from official financial reports of 180 enterprises in Soc Trang province. The binary logistic regression was employed to assess the impact of non-financial and financial factors on the bankruptcy risk of enterprises. The research findings showed that both the non-financial factors such as business area, types and size of the business, the educational level of managers and executors and other characteristics, and the financial factors (indicators) such as earnings before tax, net profit/equity ratio, earnings before interest and tax/total assets ratio, equity/total debt ratio, affect the bankruptcy risk of enterprises. Predicting the bankruptcy risk and measuring its determinants play an important role not only as an effective managing tool of the business, but also as evidence for policymakers to support the sustainable development of business.
-
Impact of determinants of the financial distress on financial sustainability of Ethiopian commercial banks
Kishor Meher
,
Henok Getaneh
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(3).2019.16
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019 Issue #3 pp. 187-201 Views: 1715 Downloads: 325 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe study aims to investigate the impact of determinants of financial distress on financial sustainability of Ethiopian commercial banks. The balanced panel data of 12 commercial banks of Ethiopia have been taken for the study from 2011 to 2017. The research deploys Ordinary Least Square (OLS) Regression Model. The indicators of financial distress are bank’s specific internals and macro-economic factors. The proxies of financial sustainability are Return on Assets, Return on Equity, Financial Stability Index and Bank Soundness. The findings reveal that the Absolute Liquidity Risk and Net Income Growth are found to be positive and significant and Solvency Risk negative and significant in relation to Return on Assets. Asset Quality is found to be positive and significant and Solvency Risk negative and significant with respect to Return on Equity. The Asset Quality and Net Income Risk are positive and significant and Solvency Risk is negative and significant with relation to the Financial Stability Index. Absolute Liquidity Risk and Liquidity Risk are positive and significant and Credit Risk negative and significant with Bank Soundness. Free Cash Flow and Net Income Growth are essential for enhancing Return on Assets and Bank Soundness, and managing equity within the prudential norms could bring forth short-term financial sustainability of commercial banks. By lowering provisioning of loan loss, Growth in Net Interest Income and managing Solvency Risk could ensure financial stability to the banks, which in turn leads to financial sustainability. The study reveals that financial sustainability of banks is insulated from the exposures of systematic risks originating from macroeconomic factors.
-
The role of moderating audit quality relationship between corporate characteristics and financial distress in the Indonesian mining sector
Perdana Wahyu Santosa ,
Martua Eliakim Tambunan ,
Eva Rohima Kumullah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.08
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 88-100 Views: 1608 Downloads: 510 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFinancial performance and corporate governance play an important role in financial distress in the mining sector, which is one of the most significant contributors to the Indonesian economy. This study aims to analyze the effect of corporate characteristics on financial distress (FD), which is moderated by corporate governance (audit quality), and uses the controlling variables (inflation rate and GDP). The study uses data from audited financial statements from mining sector in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2013–2018. Since the dependent variable (FD) is dichotomous, this study used a binary logistic regression model, as it is the case in many studies regarding the probability of bankruptcy filing. In line with the current study and some previous studies, leverage, efficiency (activity), market-to-book value, audit quality, and GDP affect the probability of financial distress significantly. Only liquidity and inflation do not impact FD. Besides, the moderating audit quality weakens the effect of liquidity and PBV; otherwise, it strengthens leverage and efficiency in predicting financial distress. As for managerial implications, this study concludes that corporate performance, corporate governance, and macro-risk factors affect the probability of financial distress. The authors suggest that mining firms need to pay attention to corporate governance and should watch the economic condition for business sustainability.
