Outcomes of job autonomy and its effect on work engagement: A study of the banking industry in Nigeria
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(3).2021.16
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2021 , Issue #3, pp. 173-183
- Cited by
- 738 Views
-
394 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
An individual’s ability to exercise freedom in how he/she plans his/her work is referred to as job autonomy, and this is associated with many positive work outcomes. Work engagement is a positive work outcome that many organizations desire to see in their employees due to its impact on productivity. This study was carried out to examine the extent of job autonomy in ensuring that banking industry employees in Nigeria attain a certain level of work engagement. The study used a mixed investigation method, including both quantitative and qualitative research techniques. The quantitative analysis involved the distribution of 438 copies of the questionnaire, of which 353 copies were retrieved from bank employees. For a qualitative assessment, 15 respondents were randomly selected from among the senior officers of the selected banks. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (PLS). As a result, job autonomy was found to be stronger with cognitive engagement (β = 0.524, Tval = 6.268, P = 0.000) and emotional engagement (β = 0.440, Tval = 4.372, P = 0.000) than with physical engagement (β = 0.341, Tval = 2.485, P = 0.000). This implied that though job autonomy had a significant influence on employee work engagement, the aspects of scheduling work and making decisions were weak areas. This study concludes that there is a need to rethink the decision-making element in the banking system, given that the workplace is tilting to a more dynamic and flexible culture, fueled by digital innovation.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support of Covenant University, Ota (Nigeria), both financial and in provision of other educational resources, in making this publication possible.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M00, M54, G21
-
References37
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Predictive relevance (path co-efficient) of job autonomy and employee work engagement
-
- Table 1. Factor loading for job autonomy in the selected Nigerian banks
- Table 2. Path coefficients for job autonomy and employee work engagement
- Table 3. Summary of regression job autonomy and employee work engagement
-
- Ajulo, A. A., Oyelere, M., & Mutema, Z. (2019). Examining perceptions towards work engagement and employees’ feelings of work engagement: A study among private and public Universities in Nigeria. The British Academy of Management (BAM) 2019 conference proceedings.
- Babarinde, S. A., & Ohikhena, P. S. (2019). Impact of stress on productivity of employees in Nigerian banking sector. The International Journal of Business & Management, 7(5), 264-271.
- Bendassolli, P. F., & Tateo, L. (2018). The meaning of work and cultural psychology: Ideas for new directions. Culture & Psychology, 24(2), 135-159.
- Dan, C. I., Roşca, A. C., & Mateizer, A. (2020). Job crafting and performance in firefighters: The role of work meaning and work engagement. Frontal Psycholology, 11, 894.
- Extremera, N., Mérida-López, S., Sánchez-Álvarez, N., & Quintana-Orts, C. (2018). How does emotional intelligence make one feel better at work? The mediational role of work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1909.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
- Harris, L. (2019). Why job autonomy is vital for success – and how to encourage it. CIPHR. UK.
- Hussain, S., Fangwei, Z., Siddiqi, A. F., Ali, Z., & Shabbir, M. S. (2018). Structural equation model for evaluating factors affecting quality of social infrastructure projects. Sustainability, 10(5), 1415.
- Hussein, A. (2018). Test of Hackman and Oldham’s job characteristics model at general media sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 352-371.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
- Joo, B., Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., & Shuck, B. (2017). Work cognition and psychological well-being: The role of cognitive engagement as a partial mediator. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(4) 446-469.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management, 33(4), 692-724.
- Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Kitonyi, I. (2019). The challenges of labour turnover in Nigeria banking sector (a case study of Access Bank Plc, Lagos) (Unpublished Thesis). Academia.
- Kuok, A. C., & Taormina, R. J. (2017). Work engagement: Evolution of the concept and a new inventory. Psychological Thought, 10(2), 262-287.
- Lin, J. T. P., & Ping, N. C. L. (2016). Perceived job autonomy and employee engagement as predictors of organizational commitment. Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 29(1), 1-16.
- Malinowska, D., Tokarz, A., & Wardzichowska, A. (2018). Job autonomy in relation to work engagement and workaholism: Mediation of autonomous and controlled work motivation. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 31(4), 445-458.
- Metin, B. (2019). HR analytics: autonomy and employee engagement. Effectory.
- Mnecke, S., Linderman-Hill, K., & Greenwald, J. M. (2020). Linking Job Autonomy to Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Challenge Demands. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020(1), 13553.
- O’Riordan, J. (2017). The practice of human resource management. Institute of Public Administration.
- Ogar, C. A., & Amanze, D. (2019). Work-life balance: The Nigerian organizational experience (A Study of selected banks in Ebonyi State). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 3(3), 145-157.
- Ohiani, A. S. (2020). Technology innovation in the Nigerian banking system: prospects and challenges. Rajagiri Management Journal, 15(1), 2-15.
- Okoseimiema, I. C., & Eketu, C. A. (2019). Organizational climate and employee engagement in banks in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research Sciences, Technology and Technology, 5(3), 57-84.
- Oliveira, A. D., Ferreira, M. C., & Ribeiro, L. P. F. (2017). Work engagement. In E. R. Neiva, C. Vaz Torres, & H. Mendonça (Eds.), Organizational psychology and evidence-based management: What science says about practice (pp. 63-80). Springer International Publishing AG.
- Oludeyi, O. S., & Aborisade, R. A. (2018). The applicability of the Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model to assembly line manufacturing organisations in Nigeria. UNIUYO Journal of Humanities (UUJH), 22(2), 277-289.
- Osibanjo, A. O., Abiodun, A. J., Salau, O. P., Adeniji, A. A., Falola, H. O., & Alimi, I. I. (2018). Job design and behavioural outcome of employees in agricultural research training, Ibadan, Nigeria. Data in Brief, 19, 1880-1887.
- Osibanjo, A., Adeniji, A., Salau, O., Atolagbe, T., Osoko, A., Edewor, O., & Olowu, J. (2020). Bolstering human capital management and engagement in the health sectors. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1-16.
- Othman, N., & Nasurdin, A. M. (2019). Job characteristics and staying engaged in work of nurses: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(4), 432-438.
- Prameswari, G. A. (2019). The Effects of Job Characteristics on Work Engagement. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 85(1), 475-479.
- Rich, B. L, Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Academic Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
- Salami, S. O., & Ajitoni, S. O. (2015). Job characteristics and burnout: The moderating roles of emotional intelligence, motivation and pay among bank employees. International Journal of Psychology, 51(5), 375-382.
- Sonnentag, S. (2017). A task-level perspective on work engagement: A new approach that helps to differentiate the concepts of engagement and burnout. Burnout Research, 5(1), 12-20.
- Strauss, A., Simonet, D. V., & Castille, C. M. (2020). The search for meaningful work: A network analysis of personality and the job characteristics model. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109569.
- Terry, M. (2020). Kahn’s 3 Dimensions of employee engagement: Still good to go in 2020? Talkfreely.
- Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.
- Xiao, J., Liu, T., & Chen, Y. (2017). The impact of performance feedback on work engagement. The mediating effect of psychological empowerment. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).