Model of management of the employees’ innovative behavior at the industrial enterprises
-
Author(s)Liubov LipychLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9059-7271
,
Iryna VolynetsLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-2109
,
Oksana KhilukhaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1228-7171
,
Ivanna MatviichukLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0953-4442
,
Zhanna SemchukLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-7716
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.16
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 197-206
- Cited by
- 966 Views
-
271 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Employee’s innovative behavior is an impulse that initiates a range of organizational processes, owing to which the enterprise forms its competitive advantage. In the article, the determinative factors of influence on the innovative behavior in the context of separate age groups were defined. According to the results of multifactor regression analysis, the determinative types of trust include institutional, horizontal and vertical, stress resistance to innovations, managerial support and innovative work environment. It was proved that the employee’s age does not affect the innovative activity of industrial enterprises. When forming the main components of the management model of innovative behavior, the focus is on personal and professional characteristics of managers, which help to form the innovative type of behavior of the employees; a system for stimulating the real results of such behavior; ways of promotion of new developments via the innovation platforms and creation of the special structural unit with the aim to implement the proposed measures.
view full abstract
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L60, M12, O31
-
References33
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Demographic structure of the respondents
- Table 2. Analysis of scales’ reliability. Mean and standard deviation
- Table 3. Influence of the respondents’ age on the determining factors of innovative behavior
-
- Borman, D., Voronina, L., & Federman, F. (1992). Менеджмент. Предпринимательская деятельность в рыночной экономике [Menedzhment. Predprinimatelskaya deyatelnost v rynochnoy ekonomike]. Ghamburgh.
- Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75-90.
- Chugunova, E. S. (1979). Формирование и развитие технического творчества молодых рабочих [Formirovanie i razvitie tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva molodykh rabochikh]. Moscow: Vysha Shkola.
- Cingöz, A., & Akdogan, A. Asuman (2011). An empirical examination of performance and image outcome expectation as determinants of innovative behavior in the workplace. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 847-853.
- De Jong, G., & Woolthuis, K. R. (2008). The institutional arrangements of innovation: antecedents and performance effects of trust in high-tech alliances. Industry and Innovation, 15(1), 45-67.
- De Jong, J., & Hartog, D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
- Garstka, T., Hummert, M. L., & Branscombe, N. (2005). Perceiving age discrimination in response to intergenerational inequity. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 321-342.
- Golovin, A. (2013). Геймификация для крупных компаний [Geimifikatsyya dlya krupnykh kompaniy].
- Hsu, M. L. A., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative Self-efficacy and Innovative Behaviour in a service setting: optimism as a moderator. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 45(4), 258-272.
- Hu, M-L.M., Horng, J-S., & Sun, Y-H.C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50.
- Jafri, M. H. (2010). Organizational commitment and employee’s innovative behavior: A study in retail sector. Journal of Management Research, 10(1), 62-68.
- Kapitonov, Е. А., Zinchenko, G. P., & Kapitonov, А. Е. (2005). Корпоративная культура: теория и практика [Korporativnaya kultura: teoriya i praktika]. Moscow: Аlfa-Press.
- Kigel, V. R. (2003). Математичні методи ринкової економіки [Matematychni metody rynkovoi ekonomiky]. Kyiv: Kondor.
- Kobiak, O. V. (n.d.). Определение понятия инновационное поведение [Opredelenie ponyatiya innovatsionnoe povedenie].
- Lipych, L. G. (2017). Взаємозалежність ефективності діяльності підприємства та рівня довіри до працівника [Vzaemozalezhnist efektyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstva ta rivnia doviry do pratsivnyka]. Ekonomichnyi chasopys Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky, 4(12), 45-52.
- Loon Hoe, S. (2007). Is interpersonal trust a necessary condition for organisational learning? Jour¬nal of Organizational Transformation and Social Change, 4(2), 149-156.
- Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69-84.
- Patrickson, M., & Hartmann, L. (1995). Australia’s ageing population: implications for human resource management. International Journal of Manpower, 16(5/6), 34-46.
- Peterson, S. J., & Spiker, B. K. (2005). Establishing the positive contributory value of older workers: a positive psychology perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 153-167.
- Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158-188.
- Rizzuto, T. E. (2011). Age and technology innovation in the workplace: Does work context matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1612-1620.
- Scott, K. D., & Cook, B. (1983). The relationship between employee age and interpersonal trust within an organizational context. Review of Business & Economic Research, 18(3), 71-82.
- Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of indi¬vidual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
- Stakhiv, O. (2007). Оцінка мотиваційного потенціалу персоналу підприємства в контексті реалізації вимог міжнародного стандарту управління якістю ISO 9001 [Otsinka motyvatsiinoho potentsialu personalu pidpryiemstva v konteksti realizatsii vymoh mizhnarodnoho standartu upravlinnia yakistu ISO 9001].
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Official website.
- Stone, D. L., & Tetrick, L. E. (2013). Understanding and facilitating age diversity in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7/8), 725-728.
- The State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2017). Чисельність наявного населення України на 1 січня 2017 року [Chyselnist naiavnoho naselennia Ukrainy na 1 sichnia 2017 roku].
- Turner, P., Turner, S., & Van De Walle, G. (2007). How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behavior and Information Technology, 26, 287-296.
- Volkov, O. I., Denysenko, M. P., & Hrechan, A. P. (2007). Економіка та організація інноваційної діяльності [Ekonomika ta orhanizatsiia innovatsiinoi diialnosti]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury.
- WHO (1993). Aging and Working Capacity, WHO Technical Report Series. World Health Organization, Geneva.
- Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., & De Jong, J. P. J. (2014). Need for Cognition as an Antecedent of Individual Innovation Behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534.
- Yesil, S., & Sozbilir, F. (2013). An Empirical Investigation into the Impact of Personality on Indi¬vidual Innovation Behaviour in the Workplace. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 540- 551.
- Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management