Methods for estimating “Fuel poverty” in public administration and management systems
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.31
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #2, pp. 341-352
- 961 Views
-
236 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The Ukrainian energy market has been analyzed region-wise in terms of consumption of fuel and energy resources by household sector. Critical aspects of improving energy security have been reflected in the context of the use of energy resources. The principal directions of the socially responsible market economy system have been offered in the light of the country’s economic security in terms of overcoming “fuel poverty”. Cognitive features of the “fuel poverty” phenomenon have been defined. Mathematical modeling of the “fuel poverty” index has been carried out using the following approaches: “after fuel cost poverty”; energy expenditure above 10% of disposable income; the Low Income – High Costs, where households with relatively high energy costs and low income are emphasized. A model of the final calculation of household energy costs has been developed for the purpose of optimal management. The graphical abstract of the obtained “fuel poverty” index solutions has been presented, with the upper left corner – low income – high costs – serving as a critical zone. The block diagram of improving the socially responsible market economy system in the light of overcoming “fuel poverty” has been offered.
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H12, J17, L94, P18, R11, R23
-
References23
-
Tables1
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. “Fuel poverty” model
- Figure 2. The “fuel poverty” modeling outcomes for Ukraine’s regions as a result of high energy costs and low household income
- Figure 3. The “fuel poverty” modeling outcomes for Ukraine’s regions as a result of measuring the residual household income after subtracting fuel and upkeep costs and comparing it to the poverty threshold, which is mainly 60% of the average national inco
- Figure 4. System for overcoming “fuel poverty” in the aspect of constructing a socially-oriented market economy in Ukraine
-
- Table 1. Results of numerical simulation of the “fuel poverty”
-
- Analytical report to the Annual Address of the President of Ukraine to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2017). On the Internal and External Situation of Ukraine in 2017 (928 p.). Kyiv, NISS.
- Boardman, B. (1991). Fuel Poverty: From Cold Homes to Affordable Warmth. London, Belhaven Press.
- Brandstätter, A. (2007). ECRB Best Practice Guidelines on the Protection of Vulnerable Household Customers.
- Energy Efficiency Schemes for Low Income Households (2010). An Overview of International Experience.
- Energy Regulators Regional Association.
- Gavkalova, N. L. (2011). Energy Supply and Energy Saving: Problems and Solutions. Problems of the Economy, 1, 47-49.
- Gazizullin, I., Lozovyi, L., & Eiklz, D. (2013). Ukraine on the Verge of Fuel poverty: How to Protect Vulnerable Social Groups, a Policy Analysis Document. International Center for Policy Studies.
- Hills, John (2011). Fuel Poverty: The Problem and Its Measurement. Interim Report of the Fuel Poverty Review. Centre for Analysis and Social Exclusion, Case Report, 69.
- Main Inspectorate of the State Energy Inspection. Dynamics of Electricity Consumption by Regions of Ukraine (2016).
- Main Statistics Service of Ukraine. Results of Use of Fuel, Heat and Electricity (2016).
- National Joint-Stock Company Naftogaz of Ukraine. Use of natural gas (2016).
- Nussbaumer, P., Bazilian, M., Modi, V., & Kandeh K. Yumkella (2011). Measuring Fuel poverty: Focusing on What Matters. Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.
- Pavlyuk, K. (2010). The System of Social Protection in Ukraine, without Modernization Cannot Do.
- Poliakova, S. V., & Novosilska, T. V. (2015). Poverty for Consumption: New Dimensions. Demographic and Social Economics, 1(23), 22-31.
- Pye, S., Dobbins, A. (2015). Fuel poverty and Vulnerable Consumers in the Energy Sector across the EU, Analysis of Policies and Measures. European Commission.
- Schuessler, R. (2014). Fuel poverty Indicators. Conceptual Issues. Part I: The Ten-Percent-Rule and Double Median/Mean Indicators (ZEW Discussion Paper, 14-037).
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Self-assessment by Households of the Availability of Individual Goods and Services.
- Shevtsov, A. (2008). Prospects of Energy Supply of Ukraine in the Context of World Trends (208 p.). NISS, Dnipro, Ukraine.
- Shyshkin, V. S. (2016). Poverty of Ukraine’s Population Under Housing Conditions. Demography and Social Economy,1(26), 51-64.
- Sukhodolia, O., & Smenkovskyi, A. Iu. (2013). Energy Sector of Ukraine: The Prospect of Reform or Stagnation? Strategic priorities, 2(27), 74-80.
- Thomson, H., Bouzarovski, S., & Snell, C. (2017). Rethinking the Measurement of Fuel poverty in Europe: A Critical Analysis of Indicators and Data. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(7), 879-901.
- Vashchenko, Yu. (2013). The Organizational and Legal Basis for Combating Fuel poverty in Ukraine in the Context of European Integration. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Law Sciences, 2, 33-36.
- Vasyliev, O. (2010). Estimation of Poverty of Ukrainian Population by Living Conditions. Scientific Herald of Poltava University of Consumer Cooperatives of Ukraine, 4(43), 94-98.