Marketing aspect of the innovation communications development
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.14(2).2018.05
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2018, Issue #2, pp. 41-49
- Cited by
- 1138 Views
-
151 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article analyzes innovation communications (InCo) as a factor for the innovation networks development. It is shown that the necessity to use InCo practice is due to the complexity of processes in high-tech sectors and the relevance of the development of appropriate organizational and economic tools for marketing relations. The main goals of the innovation networks development are determined. In the context of the study of factors for the innovation networks development, the role of relationship marketing, which involves the constructing long-term mutually beneficial relations with key partners of the economic entity, should be noted. It is determined that relationship marketing acts as a tool for practical implementation of the concept of joint creation of value in modern institutional forms of interaction in the innovation system (innovation networks, in particular virtual, international clusters, alliances, etc.). It was emphasized that in order to achieve the network aspect of innovation development of the economy, it is necessary to use models of open innovation, that is, combining efforts of economic entities in the scientific and technical field and exchange of operating results. The main communication problems, which cause the blocking of innovation development are determined. The analysis made it possible to distinguish between the groups of methods and mechanisms that are most often considered in the InCo practice. InCo practices are considered in terms of the possibility of organizing and self-regulating systems.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L10, М10, M31, O30
-
References19
-
Tables1
-
Figures1
-
- Fig. 1. Analysis of technology in the international marketing context
-
- Table 1. Communication in the field of innovation
-
- Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. А. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.
- Avdeeva, Е. А. (2011). Построение национальной инновационной системы как фактор ускорения экономического развития [Postroyeniye natsionalnoy innovatsionnoy sistemy kak factor uskoreniya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 3.
- Botta, A. (2015). The Complex Inequality-innovation-public Investment Nexus: What we (Don’t) Know, What we Should, and What we Have to Do (Post Keynesian Economics Study Group Working Paper 1506).
- Braunerhjelm, P., & Henrekson, M. (2015). An Innovation Policy Framework bridging the gap between industrial dynamics and growth (Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 391, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS – Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies).
- Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, 1, 2-23.
- Evstafiev, D. S., Molchanov, N. N., & Sharakhin, P. S. (2006). Маркетинг в информационном обществе [Marketing v informatsionnom obshchestve]. St. Petersburg: OCEEM.
- Fagerberg, J., Lundvall, B.-Å., & Srholec, M. (2017). Global value chains, national innovation systems and economic development (Papers in Innovation Studies. Paper no. 2017/15).
- Ivanova, I., Strand, Ø., Kushnir, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The Efficiency of Triple-Helix Relations in Innovation Systems: Measuring the Connection between a Country’s Net Income and Its Knowledge Base (December 8, 2015) (Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. #WP BRP 54/STI/2015).
- Krapyvny, I. V., Omelyanenko, V. A., & Vernydub, N. O. (2015). International innovation networks as new stage of innovation development. Economic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal, 1.
- Marekha, I., & Omelyanenko, V. (2016). Cultural aspect of innovation strategies’ ecologization. Economic Annals-XXI, 162(11-12), 9-12.
- Nordfors, D. (2007, July–September). PR and the Innovation Communication System. Strategic Innovators, I, 3.
- OECD (1995). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Oslo Manual (2nd ed.). DSTI, OECD/European Commission Eurostat, Paris.
- OECD (2015). System innovation: synthesis report.
- Pickar, K. (2010). Technology Transfer at Caltech. CA.
- Podluzhna, N. (2017). Spreading degree assessment of information and communication technologies in Ukraine and its regions. Nowadays and Future Jobs, 1(1), 29-36.
- Ponomarenko, T., Khudolei, V., Prokopenko, O., & Klisinski, J. (2018). Competitiveness of the information economy industry in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 85-95.
- Reut, О. P. (2007). Международный трансфер технологий и маркетинг рынка научно-технической продукции в системе Министерства образования [Mezhdunarodnyy transfer tekhnologiy i marketing rynka nauchno-tekhnicheskoy produktsii v sisteme Ministerstva obrazovaniya]. Novosti nauki i tehnologiy, 1, 32-38.
- Tretyak, О. А. (2011). Ценность клиента в течение его жизненного цикла: развитие одной из ключевых идей маркетинга взаимоотношений [Tsennost kliyenta v techeniye ego zhiznennogo tsikla: razvitiye odnoy iz kliuchevykh idey marketinga vzaimootnosheniy]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta, 3(9), 55-68.
- Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608-1618.