Investigating happiness at work along the organizational life cycle: Moderating role of locus of control
-
Received December 15, 2021;Accepted February 2, 2022;Published February 8, 2022
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3801-3160Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-3200
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.19
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #1, pp. 216-228
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by2 articlesJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title: Innovative MarketingArticle title: Locus of control as a mediating variable for the factors influencing consumptive behavior among studentsDOI: 10.21511/im.18(4).2022.09Volume: 18 / Issue: 4 / First page: 97 / Year: 2022Contributors: Widiyanto Widiyanto, Putri Lindiyatmi, Arief Yulianto
- 1146 Views
-
441 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study used business units in different stages of the organizational lifecycle (OLC) and tested employee job satisfaction, affective organizational commitment, and work engagement to understand the relationship between OLC and happiness at work. Furthermore, this study investigated Person-Organization (P-O) fit by testing for a locus of control (LOC) as a moderator to this relationship. Based on the significance of LOC for accountants, online surveys were launched in an accounting firm across twelve locations in South Africa. For the first survey, 32 partners (91%) positioned their business units onto specific stages of the OLC. In the second survey, employees (62%) completed self-evaluations of their level of job satisfaction, affective organizational commitment, work engagement, and their LOC. Spearman’s rank-order correlations revealed the range of ρ of –1.22 at a 10% significance to –1.67 at a 5% significance, concluding earlier stages of OLC to support greater levels of happiness at work.
Additionally, hierarchal regression found R-squared changes of 2% to 4%, confirming LOC as a moderator. Simulation tests found the strongest correlations with early stages of OLC for externals (range of ρ of –0.374 to –0.352 at 5% significance), moderate for internals (range of ρ of –2.12 at 10% significance to insignificant), and no relationship for those with a balanced expectancy (all insignificant). Contrary to dominant voices in the literature that support internality as a superior expectancy, this study concludes that those with a balanced LOC are more resilient to organizational factors for their happiness at work.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D91, L25
-
References64
-
Tables1
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Relationships between the stage of development of the department on the organizational life cycle and constructs of happiness at work
-
- Table 1. Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficients
-
- Adizes, I. (1979). Organizational passages – Diagnosing and treating lifecycle problems of organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 8(1), 3-25.
- Adizes, I., & Naiman, M. (1988). Corporate lifecycles: How and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it. Prentice-Hall.
- Ahn, T. (2015). Locus of control and job turnover. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1350-1365.
- April, K. A., Dharani, B., & Peters, K. (2011). Leader career success & locus of control expectancy. Academy of Taiwan Business Management Review, 7(3), 28-40.
- April, K. A., Dharani, B., & Peters, K. (2012). Impact of locus of control expectancy on level of well-being. Review of European Studies, 4(2), 124-137.
- Blank, W. (2001). The 108 skills of natural born leaders. AMACOM.
- Boone, C., van Olffen, W., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2005). Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 889-909.
- Britt, T. W., Thomas, J. L., & Dawson, C. R. (2006). Self-engagement magnifies the relationship between qualitative overload and performance in a training setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(9), 2100-2114.
- Carrim, N., Basson, J., & Coetzee, M. (2006). The relationship between job satisfaction and locus of control in a South African call centre environment. South African Jounral of Labour Relations, 30(2), 66-81.
- Chen, J., & Silverthorne, C. (2008). The impact of locus of control on job stress, job performance and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(7), 572-582.
- Coleman, D., Irving, G., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Another look at the locus of control-organizational commitment relationship: It depends on the form of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 995-1001.
- Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
- Dharani, B. (2019). Organizational lifecycle and happiness at work: Investigating best-fit for employees based on their locus of control expectancy. University of Cape Town.
- Dharani, B. (2021). At the intersection of happiness and contentment at work. In J. Marques (Ed.), The Routledge companion to happiness at work (pp. 61-75). Routledge.
- Dharani, B., & April, K. A. (2021). Locus of control and the happy entrepreneur. In Values-driven entrepreneurship and societal impact: Setting the agenda for entrepreneurship across (Southern) Africa (pp. 61-75). Kr Publishers.
- Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
- Dutton, J., & Ragins, B. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Ellis, A. M., Nifadkar, S. S., Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2017). Examining managers’ perception of newcomer proactive behavior during organizational socialization. Academy of Management Journal,2017(1), 993-1001.
- Farooqui, S., & Nagendra, A. (2014). The Impact of Person Organization Fit on Job Satisfaction and Performance of the Employees. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 122-129.
- Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384-412.
- Fisher, C. D. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring well-being at work. In P. Chen, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Work and well-being: A complete reference guide (pp. 9-33). John Wiley & Sons.
- Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134-1145.
- Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305-325.
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
- Hjelle, L., & Ziegler, D. (1976). Personality theories: Basic assumption, research and applications. McGraw-Hill.
- Hyatt, T. A., & Prawitt, D. F. (2001). Does congruence between audit structure and auditors’ locus of control affect job performance? The Accounting Review, 76(2), 263-274.
- Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M., Gibson, W., & Paul, K. (1989). Construction of a job in general scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 193-200.
- Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.
- Junior, J. H. L., Piekarski, C. M., Santos, M. G., & Francisco, A. C. (2021). Organizational life cycle assessment: A systematic review of experiences, applications and lessons learned. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 9(3), 189-203.
- Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
- Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454-470.
- Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2017). Burnout and engagement: Contributions to a new vision. Burnout Research, 5, 55-57.
- Lester, D. L., Parnell, J. A., & Carraher, S. (2003). Organizational life cycle: A five-stage empirical scale. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 339-354.
- Lofquist, L., & Dawis, R. (1969). Adjustment to work: A psychological view of man’s problems in a work-orientated society. Applton-Century-Crofts.
- Maslach, C., & Goldberg, J. (1998). Prevention of burnout: New perspectives. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 7(1), 63-74.
- Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422.
- Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
- Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.
- Mosca, L., Gianecchini, M., & Campagnolo, D. (2021). Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective. Journal of Organization Design, 10(1), 3-18.
- Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1057-1087.
- Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015). Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4), 789-822.
- Pagán-Castaño, E., Maseda-Moreno, A., & Santos-Rojo, C. (2020). Well-being in work environments. Journal of Business Research, 115(1), 469-474.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Prawitt, D. F. (1995). Staffing assignments for judgment-oriented audit tasks: The effects of structured audit technology and environment. The Accounting Review, 70(3), 443-465.
- Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33-51.
- Reed, S. A., Kratchman, S. H., & Strawser, R. H. (1994). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions of United States accountants. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(1), 31-58.
- Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.
- Russell, S. S., Spitzmüller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. (2004). Shorter can also be better: The abridged job in general scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 878-893.
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Work engagement scale. Preliminary manual. Utrecht University.
- Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59-86.
- Shirom, A. (2003). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations. In P. L. Perrewe, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Emotional and Physiological Processes and Positive Intervention Strategies (pp. 135-164). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335-340.
- Thompson, S. C. (1993). Naturally occurring perceptions of control: A model of bounded flexibility. In G. Weary, F. Gleicher, & K. L. Marsh (Eds.), Control Motivation and Social Cognition (pp. 74-93). Springer.
- Tsui, J. S. L., & Gul, F. A. (1996). Auditors’ behaviour in an audit conflict situation: A research note on the role of locus of control and ethical reasoning. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(1), 41-51.
- Valecha, G. K., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). An abbreviated measure of internal-external locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38(4), 369-376.
- Valentine, S., Silver, L., & Twigg, N. (1999). Locus of control, job satisfaction, and job complexity: The role of perceived race discrimination. Psychological Reports, 84(3_suppl), 1267-1273.
- van Saane, N., Sluiter, J. K., Verbeek, J. H. A. M., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2003). Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction – A systematic review. Occupational Medicine, 53(3), 191-200.
- Verme, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom and control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 146-161.
- Walsh, L. C., Boehm, J. K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018). Does happiness promote career success? Revisiting the evidence. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(2), 199-219.
- Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 761-768.
- Warr, P. (2007). Searching for happiness at work. Psychologist, 20(12), 726-729.
- Wefald, A. J., Mills, M. J., Smith, M. R., & Downey, R. G. (2012). A comparison of three job engagement measures: Examining their factorial and criterion-related validity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 4(1), 67-90.
- Wijbenga, F. H., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Entrepreneurial locus of control and competitive strategies – The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(5), 566-589.
- Zelenski, J. M., Murphy, S. A., & Jenkins, D. A. (2008). The happy-productive worker thesis revisited. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(4), 521-537.
-
-
Conceptualization
Babar Dharani
-
Data curation
Babar Dharani
-
Formal Analysis
Babar Dharani
-
Investigation
Babar Dharani
-
Methodology
Babar Dharani
-
Resources
Babar Dharani, Kurt April
-
Validation
Babar Dharani
-
Writing – original draft
Babar Dharani
-
Project administration
Kurt April
-
Supervision
Kurt April
-
Writing – review & editing
Kurt April
-
Conceptualization
-
Factors affecting employee turnover and sound retention strategies in business organization: a conceptual view
Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun , Md. Nazmul Hasan doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.06Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 63-71 Views: 15920 Downloads: 6795 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ“Employee turnover” as an expression is broadly used in business organization. Despite the fact that several studies have been performed on this topic, little research has been conducted on examining the causes and leading factors of turnover as well, as advising some feasible approaches, which can be applied by bosses to ensure that employees will continue in their respective organizations to enhance organizational effectiveness and productivity. The main purpose of this study is to determine the reasons and key factors in the perspectives of the relevant literature and identify to the intention of employee turnover. This conceptual paper also suggests various possible strategies on how to minimize the turnover and retain employees in the organizations. Hence, the paper has proposed a conceptual framework that shows the major variables in explaining the phenomenon of employee turnover and addressing sound retention strategies to handle these issues.
-
The growth strategies of a global pharmaceutical company: a case study of Aspen Pharmacare Holdings Limited
Victoria Margaret Hodgon , Muhammad Ehsanul Hoque doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.12Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 (cont.) pp. 248-259 Views: 2922 Downloads: 3158 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯGiven the rapid and sustained growth of Aspen over the past decade, the main aim of this study is to identify and analyze the growth strategies, adopted by Aspen over the period from 2004 to 2014. The research method used was a descriptive study through a single case study of Aspen by analyzing secondary data in the form of publicly available company reports and presentations, as well as financial results, issued between 2004 and 2014. The study finds that, guided by strategic and visionary leadership, Aspen adopted a number of growth strategies including (i) organic growth, as a key factor in creating incremental value for Aspen and its stakeholders, (ii) inorganic growth, in the form of carefully planned and well executed acquisitions, aligned to the Group strategy, (iii) extending territorial coverage through global expansion, particularly into emerging pharmaceutical countries, and (iv) ongoing investment in production capabilities as a means of achieving a strategic advantage. Despite the challenges of intense competition, restrictive legislation, pressure on medicine prices, currency volatility and market specific risks, Aspen has delivered double-digit earnings growth to its shareholders for 16 consecutive years.
-
Executive compensation and firm performance: a non-linear relationship
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 1-17 Views: 2880 Downloads: 292 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn order to ensure profitability for shareholders, optimal contracting recommends the alignment between executive compensation and company performance. Large organizations have therefore adopted executives remuneration systems in order to induce positive market reaction and motivate executives. Complex compensation schemes are designed by Boards of Directors using strong pay-performance incentives that explain high levels of executive pay along with company size, demand for management skills and executive influence. However, the literature remains inconclusive on the pay-performance relationship owing to the various empirical methods used by researchers. Additionally, there has been little effort in the literature to compare methodologies on the pay-performance relationship.
Using the dominant agency theory framework, the purpose of this study is to establish and examine the relationship between firm performance and executive pay. In addition, it intends to assess the characteristic of model specifications commonly adopted. To this aim, a quantitative analysis consisting of three complementary methods was performed on panel data from South African listed companies. The results of the main unrestricted first difference model indicate a strong non-linear relationship where the impact of current and previous firm performance on executive pay can be observed over 2 to 4-year period providing support to the optimal contracting theoretical perspective in the South African business context. In addition, CEO pay is more sensitive to firm performance as compared to Director pay. Lastly, although it affects executive pay levels, company size is not found to improve the pay-performance relationship.