Inter-organizational imitation: Definition and typology

  • Received March 13, 2017;
    Accepted April 12, 2017;
    Published April 19, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Bilal Bourkha , Younes Belfellah
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.03
  • Article Info
    Volume 1 2017, Issue #1, pp. 23-31
  • TO CITE
  • 1472 Views
  • 312 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The sustained idea of this article is that the concept of imitation has not been sufficiently developed in the field of strategic management and has often been confused with the notion of mimicry. Therefore, the objective of this research is to emphasize the distinction between different types of imitation unlike a lot of research on companies imitative behavior focused on one type as the perfect imitation. This will clarify ambiguities in the literature on imitation, and show that the mobilization of neo institutional theory is not sufficient to explain all the imitative behavior of organizations in a market.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Fig. 1. Imitation matrix
    • Table 1. The imitation and organizational life
    • Table 2. Meta analysis of imitation and innovation
    • Table 3. The characteristics and the concepts associating to other types of imitation
    • Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp. 254-285.
    • Augarten, S. (1984). Bit by Bit: an illustrated history of computers; New York: Ticknor & Fields.
    • Baize, D. (1999). De la contrefaçon à l'imitation. Revue française de Gestion, 119 (25), pp. 76-81.
    • Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), pp. 797-817.
    • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.
    • Baudonnière, P. M. (1997). Le mimétisme et l’imitation; Paris: Dominos Flammarion.
    • Bensebaa, F. (2000). Actions stratégiques et réactions des enterprises. Management, 3(2), pp. 57-79.
    • Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), pp. 992-1026.
    • Bolton, M. K., (1993). Imitation versus Innovation: lessons to be learned from the Japanese. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), pp. 30-45.
    • Brandes, P., Hadani, M., & Goranova, M. (2006). Stock options expensing: An examination of agency and institutional theory explanations. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), pp. 595-603.
    • Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Organizational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5), pp. 565-586.
    • Cadix, A. & Pointet, J. M. (2002). Le management à l'épreuve des changements technologiques. Impacts sur la société et les organisations; Paris: Organisation.
    • Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneer advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), pp. 285-298.
    • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 555-590.
    • Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), pp. 147-166.
    • Delios A., & Henisz, W. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), pp. 443-475.
    • Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147-160.
    • Dolphin, R. (1987). Photography’s March of Time, Maclean’s, April 24, pp. 51-52.
    • Garcia-Pont, C., & Nohria, N. (2002). Local versus global mimetism: the dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), pp. 307-321.
    • Greenberg, C. (1992). Future Worth: Before It’s Hot, Grab It. New York Times, April 16, p. 19.
Related Articles

  • Prospects of business process management based on chatbots

    Leonid MelnykORCID Researcher ID, Lyudmila KalinichenkoORCID , Yuliia RozghonORCID , Oleksandr Derykolenko , Oksana KovtunORCID Researcher ID, Oleg TulyakovORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.16
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 22, 2024         Issue #2         pp. 197-212 Views: 385 Downloads: 158 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The relevance of the study is due to the growing need to use chatbots to optimize business processes. The purpose is to form a theoretical basis and practical tools for increasing the efficiency of using chatbots in business processes. The theoretical basis involves substantiating the theoretical foundations of forming a conditional chatbot profile for an optimization system. The practical toolkit includes chatbot components that depend on the complexity of tasks, the type of services, the specifics of customers, financial conditions, and other features of business processes. The result is the formation of a system profile of the chatbot, which would allow increasing the efficiency of its use in business processes. The key system components of the chatbot are substantiated: the technologies used, types of users, optimal areas of application, application algorithms, basic tools, and limitations in application. By varying the parameters of system components, one can choose their optimal values to increase the efficiency of using chatbots in business processes. It is advisable to use the specified system in business processes when determining the demand for products and their sales. The use of chatbots allows to reduce the time to complete business processes, personnel costs, and resources related to their implementation.

    Acknowledgment
    The paper was prepared in the framework of the research projects “Fundamental grounds for Ukraine’s transition to a digital economy based on the implementation of Industries 3.0; 4.0; 5.0” (No. 0124U000576) and “Digital transformations to ensure civil protection and post-war economic recovery in the face of environmental and social challenges” (No. 0124U000549).

Download Preview
Close
Accounting and Financial Control
Accounting and Financial Control