Influence of consumer motivations and perception on the adoption of smart, green, and sustainable building materials
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(4).2023.06
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2023, Issue #4, pp. 66-80
- Cited by
- 612 Views
-
127 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this study is to analyze the barriers to the widespread use of smart, green, and sustainable building materials in the construction industry by focusing on the perceptions, motivations, strategies, and challenges faced by consumers. The analysis employed an exploratory methodology and surveyed 385 respondents in Bangalore, India. The study result shows a significant positive partial correlation (r = 0.629, p = 0.001) between the challenges of adoption and the overall factors that influence adoption after controlling the annual income as a control variable. The higher mean score of personal values and ethics of 4.25 implies that moral values and ethics influence the decisions on the adoption of construction materials. The findings of multiple regression with robust standard error revealed perception of performance of smart, green and sustainable building materials is better compared to traditional building materials (p-value = 0.001), factors positively influencing adoption (p-value = 0.004), motivating factors of adoption (p-value = 0.001) and strategies that encourage adoption of smart, green, and sustainable building materials (p-value = 0.001). All of these have a substantial influence on how consumers evaluate the government’s efforts to increase the adoption of such materials. However, challenges in adoption showed a negative coefficient (B= –0.049) and a robust standard error of 0.024 (p-value = 0.048), demonstrating a negative influence on consumers’ perception. This research acts as a guiding beacon for green adoption policies by studying consumer motivations and perceptions toward adoption of eco-friendly building materials for the sustainable future.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M00, M30, M31, L74, Q01
-
References45
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research framework for H1, H2 and H3
- Figure 2. Mean and standard deviation scores of factors positively influencing adoption
-
- Table 1. Reliability analysis for measuring internal consistency
- Table 2. Multiple regression with robust standard errors
- Table 3. Multivariate analysis (MANOVA)
- Table 4. MANOVA with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis
- Table 5. Partial correlation investigating relationship between challenges/hurdles in adoption (CIA) and overall factors affecting adoption (OFAA)
-
- Adeniyi, S. M., & Mohamed, S. F. (2020). Prospects and challenges of green materials for construction low-cost building in Nigeria. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 884(1), 012048.
- Agyekum, K., Adinyira, E., Baiden, B., Ampratwum, G., & Duah, D. (2019). Barriers to the adoption of green certification of buildings: A thematic analysis of verbatim comments from built environment professionals. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 17(5), 1035-1055.
- Akcay, E. C. (2023). Barriers to undertaking green building projects in developing countries : A Turkish perspective. Buildings, 13, 841.
- Alexander-Bloch, A., Giedd, J. N., & Bullmore, E. (2013). Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 322-336.
- Anastasiou, C., Nicolaides, D., & Michael, A. (2022). The challenges of introducing a new green building material in environmentally emerging countries; A stakeholders’ perceptions study in Cyprus. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 22(6.2), 649-656.
- Blanco, J. M., Frómeta, Y. G., Madrid, M., & Cuadrado, J. (2021). Thermal performance assessment of walls made of three types of sustainable concrete blocks by means of FEM and validated through an extensive measurement campaign. Sustainability, 13(1), 386.
- Böck, F. (2014). Green gold of Africa – Can growing native bamboo in Ethiopia become a commercially viable business? The Forestry Chronicle, 90(05), 628-635.
- Cen, Q., Chen, S., Yang, D., Zheng, D., & Qiu, X. (2023). Full bio-based aerogel incorporating lignin for excellent flame retardancy, mechanical resistance, and thermal insulation. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 11(11), 4473-4484.
- Chen, L., Huang, L., Hua, J., Chen, Z., Wei, L., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., Dong, L., & Yap, P. S. (2023). Green construction for low-carbon cities: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(3), 1627-1657.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
- Daniel, J. J., Basoro, D., & Gebrie, M. (2021). An engineered alternative brick masonry unit for the poor inhabitants at Hawassa village, Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, 8(79), 717-734.
- Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Review of barriers to green building adoption. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 167-179.
- Djokoto, S. D., Dadzie, J., & Ohemeng-Ababio, E. (2014). Barriers to sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry: Consultants perspectives. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1).
- Furuya, D. E. G., Furuya, M. T. G., & De Oliveira, R. C. (2018). The recognition of environmental certifications in the civil construction sector. Colloquium Exactarum, 10, 203-206.
- Gounder, S., Hasan, A., Shrestha, A., & Elmualim, A. (2023). Barriers to the use of sustainable materials in Australian building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(1), 189-209.
- Graham, E., & Warren-Myers, G. (2019). Investigating the efficacy of a professional education program in promoting sustainable residential construction practices in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1238-1248.
- Günther, E., Fricke, M., Lölsberg, W., Klinkebiel, A., & Weinrich, D. (2020). New aerogel products for construction use: Product specifications, application examples, practical aspects. E3S Web of Conferences, 172, 21005.
- Johnstone, M. L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 311-328.
- Jung, Y., Park, K., & Ahn, J. (2019). Sustainability in higher education: Perceptions of social responsibility among university students. Social Sciences, 8(3), 90.
- Kirby, R. C. L. de S., Inácio, L. da S., & Delai, I. (2023). Factors affecting green building consumer behaviour: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(2), 164-178.
- Knief, U., & Forstmeier, W. (2021). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2576-2590.
- Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2019). At the nexus of blockchain technology, the circular economy, and product deletion. Applied Sciences, 9(8), 1712.
- Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74-89.
- Lianto, F., Trisno, R., Husin, D., & Teh, S. W. (2019). Changing the face of modern architecture: bamboo as a construction material. Case study: Green school, Bali – Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 508(1), 012023.
- Macrotrends. (n.d.). Bangalore, India Metro Area Population 1950–2023.
- Manhanga, F. C., Rudžionis, Z., Ivanauskas, E., & Augonis, A. (2022). The investigations on properties of self-healing concrete with crystalline admixture and recycled concrete waste. MATEC Web of Conferences, 364, 05002.
- Mishra, S. (2015). Utilization of Earth technologies for socio-economy upliftment. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(5), 1-6.
- Mouzaneh, M., Harun, Z., & Jamil, N. (2022). Awareness of green building in West Bank Palestine. International Journal of Global Optimization and Its Application, 1(4), 249-257.
- Patel, J., & Goyal, A. (2018). Smart materials in construction technology. 2018 International Conference on Smart City and Emerging Technology, ICSCET 2018. Mumbai, India.
- Ramatia, D., Yosrilrafiq, M., & Aranti, A. (2020). OSB (oriented strand board green building): Utilization of OSB betung bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper (Schult. F.) Backer ex Heyne) by testing physical and mechanical properties to optimize eco-friendly construction in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 528(1), 012046.
- Saha, S., Hiremath, R. B., Prasad, S., & Kumar, B. (2021). Barriers to adoption of commercial green buildings in India: A review. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 13(2), 107-128.
- Setiyowati, E., & Mappaturi, A. B. (2020). Comparison between chemical and natural treatments for bamboo as building material towards sustainable construction method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 456(1), 012043.
- Shanmugam, G., Gunasekaran, E., Karuppusamy, R. S., Ramesh, R., & Vellaichamy, P. (2020). Utilization of aerogel in building construction – A review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 955(1), 012032.
- Simion, C. P., Nicolescu, C., & Vrîncut, M. (2019). Green procurement in Romanian construction projects. A cluster analysis of the barriers and enablers to green procurement in construction projects from the Bucharest-Ilfov Region of Romania. Sustainability, 11(22), 6231.
- Sogari, G., Mora, C., & Menozzi, D. (2016). Factors driving sustainable choice: The case of wine. British Food Journal, 118(3), 632-646.
- Sonebi, M., Abdalqader, A., Amziane, S., Dvorkin, L., Ghorbel, E., Kenai, S., Khatib, J., Lushnikova, N., & Perrot, A. (2022). Trends and opportunities of using local sustainable building materials in the Middle East and North Africa region. RILEM Technical Letters, 7, 127-138.
- Song, Y., & Zhang, H. (2018). Research on sustainability of building materials. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 452(2), 022169.
- Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
- Tam, V. W. Y., Hao, J. L., & Zeng, S. X. (2012). What affects implementation of green buildings? An empirical study in Hong Kong. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16(2), 115-125.
- Tekpe, E., Ansah, S. K., & Akomah, B. B. (2022). Appropriate technology and design: A solution for sustainable and affordable housing delivery in major cities of Ghana. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 23(8), 18-29.
- Thomas, C. L., & Heath, J. A. (2022). Using latent profile analysis to investigate emotional intelligence profiles in a sample of American university students. Psychology in the Schools, 59(9), 1802-1824.
- Vignali, C., Brandt, W. N., & Schneider, D. P. (2003). X-ray emission from radio-quiet quasars in the Sloan digital sky survey early data release: The αox dependence upon ultraviolet luminosity. The Astronomical Journal, 125(2), 433-443.
- Wu, D. W. L., DiGiacomo, A., & Kingstone, A. (2013). A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e53856.
- Yang, S., Su, Y., Wang, W., & Hua, K. (2019). Research on developers’ green procurement behavior based on the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 11(10), 2949.
- Zhao, H., Wang, Y., Qiu, W., Qu, W., & Zhang, X. (2018). Research on the application of green building materials in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 186(2).