Impact of government support policies on firm performance of Vietnam’s small and medium tourism enterprises: The mediating role of competitive advantage
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.37
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 498-511
- 61 Views
-
14 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The government plays a decisive role in the general stability and sustainable development of the business community and tourism enterprises in particular. The recent Covid-19 pandemic has served as clear evidence of the government’s crucial support for tourism businesses. This study was conducted to explore and measure the impact of government support on the firm performance of small and medium tourism enterprises in Vietnam from the perspective of business leaders. Data were collected based on a survey of 798 leaders working in small and medium tourism enterprises. The results showed that government support before, during, and after the Covid-19 pandemic, through tax policies, credit policies, legal procedure support policies, and labor and social welfare policies, positively influenced firm performance through the mediating role of enhancing competitive advantage. However, this study found that digital transformation in small and medium-sized tourism enterprises had an insignificant impact on improving competitive advantage and firm performance. The results contribute to enriching the overall theory and provide policy and managerial implications for stakeholders in the future.
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by the Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam with code B2023-DHH-02 under decision No. 2036/QD-BGDDT dated July 22, 2022. Furthermore, this study is the result of collaboration between a group of scientists from the Faculty of Law, Hue University, and School of Business and Economics, Duy Tan University. The authors would like to acknowledge the support and facilitation provided by both institutions for the publication of this article.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G38, L25, L53, K40, M29
-
References36
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Testing the PLS-SEM structural model
-
- Table 1. Measurement summary
- Table 2. Summary statistics of the samples
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics, internal reliability, and convergent reliability
- Table 4. The HTMT coefficient between pairs of variables
- Table 5. Structural model evaluation
- Table 6. Testing direct and indirect impacts
-
- Anwar, M. (2018). Business model innovation and SMEs performance – Does competitive advantage mediate? International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(7), Article 1850057.
- Bilgili, B., & Koc, E. (2021). Digital transformation in tourism. In Emerging Transformations in Tourism and Hospitality. Routledge.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Hai, T. T. T., & Tron, V. N. (2023). The differential effects of government support, inter-firm collaboration, and firm financial resources on SME performance in Vietnam. Cuadernos de Economía, 46(130), 124-134.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(1), 82-109.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429-438.
- Huong, V. V., & Cuong, L. K. (2019). Does government support promote SME tax payments? New evidence from Vietnam. Finance Research Letters, 31, 270-277.
- Işeri-Say, A., Toker, A., & Kantur, D. (2008). Do popular management techniques improve performance?: Evidence from large businesses in Turkey. Journal of Management Development, 27(7), 660-677.
- Jeong, H., Shin, K., Kim, S., & Kim, E. (2021). What types of government support on food SMEs improve innovation performance? Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9461.
- Kantur, D. (2016). Strategic entrepreneurship: Mediating the entrepreneurial orientation-performance link. Management Decision, 54(1), 24-43.
- Khanh, D. P. T., Thuy, V. T. N., & Tram, T. N. B. (2023). The effect of innovation on competitive advantage and SMEs performance in Vietnam: The moderating role of customer orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(6), 1052-1076.
- Liu, N., Xu, Q., & Gao, M. (2024). Digital transformation and tourism listed firm performance in COVID-19 shock. Finance Research Letters, 63, Article 105398.
- Mick, M. M. A. P., Kovaleski, J. L., Mick, R. L., & Chiroli, D. M. D. G. (2024). Developing a sustainable digital transformation roadmap for SMEs: Integrating digital maturity and strategic alignment. Sustainability, 16(20), Article 8745.
- Nguyen, H. T. T., Vu Van, H., Bartolacci, F., & Tran, T. Q. (2018). The impact of government support on firm performance in Vietnam. New evidence from a dynamic approach. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 101-123.
- Nguyen, T. N., & Wongsurawat, W. (2012). The impact of government policies on the development of small- and medium-sized enterprises: The case of Vietnam. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 6(2), 188-200.
- OECD. (2010). Tourism 2020: Policies to promote competitive and sustainable tourism. In OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2021). Blockchain entrepreneurs’ survey: Business barriers: Share of blockchain companies in Israel and Italy. In The Digital Transformation of SMEs. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Pergelova, A., & Angulo-Ruiz, F. (2014). The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: The role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(9-10), 663-705.
- Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
- Shehadeh, M., Almohtaseb, A., Aldehayyat, J., & Abu-AlSondos, I. A. (2023). Digital transformation and competitive advantage in the service sector: A moderated-mediation model. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2077.
- Sigala, M. (2020). Technology and tourism: Themes, concepts and issues. In Tourism. Routledge.
- Songling, Y., Ishtiaq, M., Anwar, M., & Ahmed, H. (2018). The role of government support in sustainable competitive position and firm performance. Sustainability, 10(10), Article 3495.
- Susanto, A. B. (2019). The effect of government policy and environmental sustainability on the performance of tourism business competitiveness: Empirical assessment on the reports of international tourism agencies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(6), 439-446.
- Tanklevska, N., Petrenko, V., Karnaushenko, A., Yarmolenko, V., & Kostiuk, T. (2020). Improving the process of the financial potential management of tourism enterprises. In B. Alareeni, A. Hamdan, & I. Elgedawy (Eds.), The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries (pp. 679-701). Cham:Springer.
- Tussyadiah, I. (2020). A review of research into automation in tourism: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on artificial intelligence and robotics in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 81, Article 102883.
- Wang, R., & Kesan, J. P. (2022). Do tax policies drive innovation by SMEs in China? Journal of Small Business Management, 60(2), 309-346.
- Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2002). Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organization Science, 13(1), 82-105.
- Xuan, V. N., Thu, N. T. P., & Anh, N. T. (2020). Factors affecting the business performance of enterprises: Evidence at Vietnam small and medium-sized enterprises. Management Science Letters, 10(4), 865-870.
- Yang, S., Ishtiaq, M., & Anwar, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management practices and firm performance, the mediating role of competitive advantage and the moderating role of financial literacy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(3), Article 35.
- Yanuarni, E., Iqbal, M., Astuti, E. S., Mawardi, M. K., & Alfisyahr, R. (2024). Determinants of business recovery: The role of government support as moderator (A study on tourism SMEs affected by Lombok earthquake, Indonesia). Human Systems Management, 43(1), 79-97.
- Zúñiga Collazos, A., Rios Obando, J. F., Gómez López, J. M., & Vargas García, L. M. (2023). Public policy and its impact on innovation, competitiveness, and performance in the tourism sector. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2).