Impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees: Evidence from Chinese listed companies
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.53
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #3, pp. 682-697
- 374 Views
-
118 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
High economic policy uncertainty in China amplifies operational risks and managerial pressure for businesses while driving the demand for independent audits. However, previous studies have paid limited attention to the impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees. This study aims to examine the impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees and to test whether the internal control quality will moderate this association at the firm level. This study employs the economic policy uncertainty index to measure uncertainty. The paper examines 3,469 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020, using STATA 17 for fixed-effects regression on panel data. The results show a robust positive association between economic policy uncertainty and audit fees (β = 0.0302, p < 0.001). However, this association is weaker for companies with better internal control quality (β = –0.0229, p < 0.001), suggesting that effective internal controls can mitigate the impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees. Furthermore, the findings indicate that this positive association is weaker for state-owned companies compared to non-state-owned companies (β = –0.0170, p < 0.001). At the same time, the study does not establish a significant difference in the positive association between TOP 10 and non-TOP 10 accounting firms. This study examines the adverse effects of economic policy uncertainty from the perspective of audit fees. The results have implications for stakeholders, including the need for companies to establish effective internal controls and good government-business relationships and for governments to reduce economic policy uncertainty and increase transparency in their policies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E60, M41, M42
-
References71
-
Tables9
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
-
- Table 1. Sample selection procedure
- Table 2. Sample distribution by year and industry
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Pairwise correlations analysis
- Table 5. Main regression analysis
- Table 6. Moderating effect test
- Table 7. Robustness check
- Table 8. Heterogeneity analysis
- Table A1. Variables and definition
-
- Alabdullah, T. T., & Maryanti, E. (2021). Internal control mechanisms in accounting, management, and economy: A review of the literature and suggestions of new investigations. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 10(9), 8-12.
- Altamuro, J., & Beatty, A. (2010). How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 58-74.
- Al-Thaqeb, S. A., & Algharabali, B. G. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty: A literature review. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 20, e00133.
- Asare, S. K., Fitzgerald, B. C., Graham, L. E., Joe, J. R., Negangard, E. M., & Wolfe, C. J. (2013). Auditors’ internal control over financial reporting decisions: Analysis, synthesis, and research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(suppl_1), 131-166.
- Audousset-Coulier, S. (2015). Audit fees in a joint audit setting. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 347-377.
- Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593-1636.
- Barua, A., Hossain, M. S., & Rama, D. V. (2019). Financial versus operating liability leverage and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 231-244.
- Bell, T. B., Doogar, R., & Solomon, I. (2008). Audit labor usage and fees under business risk auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 729-760.
- Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85-106.
- Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623-685.
- Bloom, N. (2014). Fluctuations in uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 153-176.
- Brennan, M. J., & Schwartz, E. S. (1978). Corporate income taxes, valuation, and the problem of optimal capital structure. Journal of Business, 51(1), 103-114.
- Bronson, S. N., Ghosh, A., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Audit fee differential, audit effort, and litigation risk: An examination of ADR firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 83-117.
- Chen, X., Lee, C.-W. J., & Li, J. (2008). Government assisted earnings management in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(3), 262-274.
- Chen, Y., Smith, A. L., Cao, J., & Xia, W. (2014). Information technology capability, internal control effectiveness, and audit fees and delays. Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 149-180.
- Chen, Y., Ye, Z., & Huang, G. (2018). The financial crisis in Wenzhou: An unanticipated consequence of China’s “Four trillion yuan economic stimulus package”. China: An International Journal, 16(1), 152-173.
- Christiansen, M., & Loft, A. (1992). Big players and small players: A study of increasing concentration in the Danish market for auditing services. European Accounting Review, 1(2), 277-301.
- Davis, L. R., Ricchiute, D. N., & Trompeter, G. (1993). Audit effort, audit fees, and the provision of nonaudit services to audit clients. The Accounting Review, 68(1), 135-150.
- DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
- Eberly, J. C. (1994). Adjustment of consumers’ durables stocks: Evidence from automobile purchases. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3), 403-436.
- Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330-357.
- Feng, M., Li, C., & McVay, S. (2009). Internal control and management guidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 190-209.
- Fleischer, R., & Goettsche, M. (2012). Size effects and audit pricing: Evidence from Germany. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 21(2), 156-168.
- Foote, C., Hurst, E., & Leahy, J. (2000). Testing the (S, s) model. American Economic Review, 90(2), 116-119.
- Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23, 28-37.
- Gong, S. X., Gul, F. A., & Shan, L. (2018). Do auditors respond to media coverage? Evidence from China. Accounting Horizons, 32(3), 169-194.
- Grandell, J. (1991). Aspects of risk theory. New York: Springer.
- Griffin, P. A., & Lont, D. H. (2007). An analysis of audit fees following the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 14(2), 161-192.
- Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2016). Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), 523-564.
- Hackenbrack, K. E., & Hogan, C. E. (2005). Client retention and engagement-level pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(1), 7-20.
- Hackenbrack, K., & Knechel, W. R. (1997). Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 481-499.
- Hay, D. (2013). Further evidence from meta-analysis of audit fee research. International Journal of Auditing, 17(2), 162-176.
- Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141-191.
- Hay, D., & Jeter, D. (2011). The pricing of industry specialisation by auditors in New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2), 171-195.
- Hoang, H. V. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty, auditor switch decisions and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Hogan, C. E., & Wilkins, M. S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies? Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 219-242.
- Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U., & Bedard, J. C. (2008). Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(1), 105-126.
- Hung, Y.-S., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2018). The impact of information complexity on audit failures from corporate fraud: Individual auditor level analysis. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(2), 72-85.
- Ittonen, K., & Peni, E. (2012). Auditor’s gender and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), 1-18.
- Jian, J., He, K., Liu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2023). Corporate social responsibility: Opportunistic behavior under earnings management? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics.
- Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45-83.
- Kang, W., Lee, K., & Ratti, R. A. (2014). Economic policy uncertainty and firm-level investment. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, 42-53.
- Knechel, W. R., & Payne, J. L. (2001). Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 137-146.
- Lai, K.-W. (2009). Audit opinion and disclosure of audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 91-114.
- Leduc, S., & Liu, Z. (2016). Uncertainty shocks are aggregate demand shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics, 82, 20-35.
- Lee, J. E. (2018). Internal control deficiencies and audit pricing: Evidence from initial public offerings. Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1201-1229.
- Lesage, C., Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V., & Kettunen, J. (2017). Consequences of the abandonment of mandatory joint audit: An empirical study of audit costs and audit quality effects. European Accounting Review, 26(2), 311-339.
- Lin, K. J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 31-55.
- Mazza, T., & Azzali, S. (2018). Information technology controls quality and audit fees: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 33(1), 123-146.
- Mirza, S. S., & Ahsan, T. (2020). Corporates’ strategic responses to economic policy uncertainty in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 375-389.
- Mitra, S., Hossain, M., & Deis, D. R. (2007). The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28, 257-285.
- Palmrose, Z.-V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.
- Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219-1264.
- Pong, C. K. M., & Burnett, S. (2006). The implications of merger for market share, audit pricing and non-audit fee income: The case of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 7-22.
- Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 277-298.
- Rjiba, H., Jahmane, A., & Abid, I. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Guiding through economic policy uncertainty. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101553.
- Simon, D. T., & Francis, J. R. (1988). The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Tests of price cutting and price recovery. Accounting Review, 63(2), 255-269.
- Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
- Simunic, D. A. (1984). Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(2), 679-702.
- Singhania, M., & Anchalia, J. (2013). Volatility in Asian stock markets and global financial crisis. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 10(3), 333-351.
- Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 640-661.
- Stanga, K. G., & Turpen, R. A. (1991). Ethical judgments on selected accounting issues: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 739-747.
- Stein, M. T., Simunic, D. A., & Keefe, T. B. (1994). Industry differences in the production of audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(1), 128-142.
- Vafeas, N., & Waegelein, J. F. (2007). The association between audit committees, compensation incentives, and corporate audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(3), 241-255.
- Wang, J., & Zhu, R. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty, corporate risk-taking and abnormal audit fees. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(12), 1-28.
- Wang, Y., Chen, C. R., & Huang, Y. S. (2014). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 26, 227-243.
- Xie, H., Yang, Z., & Xu, S. (2022). Benefit synergy or “fishing in troubled waters”? Economic policy uncertainty and executive perquisite consumption. Kybernetes.
- Yang, X., & Nahm, A. Y. (2023). The government-business relations: How Chinese business leaders take part in government policy formulation in the National People’s Congress. Journal of Chinese Governance, 8(2), 256-282.
- Yun, Y., & Chun, H. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and audit effort: Evidence from audit hours. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(4), 643-662.
- Zhang, M., Xu, H., Tong, L., & Ye, T. (2018). International evidence on economic policy uncertainty and asymmetric adjustment of audit pricing: Big 4 versus non-big 4 auditors. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(5-6), 728-756.
- Zhao, P., & Wang, Y. (2022). How does economic policy uncertainty affect momentum returns? Evidence from China. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 59.
-
What do we know about empirical joint audit research? A literature review
Patrick Velte
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.01
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 4-14 Views: 2013 Downloads: 1275 TO CITEThis literature review evaluates empirical studies which concentrate on economic effects on joint audits from an international perspective. We briefly introduce the theoretical and empirical joint audit framework that comprises an adequate structure of the state-of-the-art of empirical research in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the following output factors of joint audits: (1) audit quality; (2) audit costs and (3) audit market concentration. We will summarize the key findings in each area, and provide a description of the analyzed proxies. Finally, we will discuss the current limitations of the studies and give useful recommendations for future empirical research activities in this topic.
-
Investigating the effect of corporate governance on audit quality and its impact on investment efficiency
Walid Shehata Mohamed Kasim Soliman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.14
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 175-188 Views: 1418 Downloads: 528 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThere is an academic discussion about investment efficiency, regarding its determinants and effects. Corporate Governance (CG) and Audit Quality (AQ) are determinants of investment efficiency The main objective of the article is to investigate the effect of CG and AQ on investment efficiency, this objective is divided into sub-objectives: to investigate the direct effect of CG on AQ, AQ on investment efficiency, and CG on investment efficiency. Moreover, the indirect effect of CG on investment efficiency through AQ as a mediator variable. This paper focuses on non-financial listed firms in the Egyptian Stock Exchange (EGX), especially firms recorded in EGX 100 for four years’ period (2013–2018), for 103 firms and 412 completed observations. The researcher uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through SmartPLS software. The paper shows evidence that management that has good CG mechanisms obtains a suitable atmosphere to prepare transparent financial statements, which helps enhance the auditor’s role and improve AQ. Improving AQ lowering IA, which increases the trust of investors in management decisions, this leads to reduce pressure on management and improve efficiency of investment decisions. Having good CG mechanisms provides management with a good atmosphere to make right investment decisions, and having good CG mechanisms increases AQ, which helps management to have a good environment to make investment decisions with higher efficiency, or in other words, there is a significant and positive effect of integration between CG and AQ on investment efficiency.
-
The impact of ownership structure on external audit quality: A comparative study between Egypt and Saudi Arabia
Hossam Hassan Mahmoud Al Sharawi
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(2).2022.07
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 19, 2022 Issue #2 pp. 81-94 Views: 759 Downloads: 413 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study aims to compare the impact of the ownership structure as one of the essential internal mechanisms of governance on the proxies of external audit quality on a sample of 82 listed Egyptian companies and 77 listed Saudi companies from 2014 to 2021, employing the OLS regression analysis. The current study found mixed results according to the type of ownership and indicators of the external audit quality, both in Egyptian and Saudi companies. The results showed a significant effect of board ownership, management ownership, and family ownership on audit quality. However, the direction of this effect varied between positive or negative in Egyptian or Saudi companies, and the effect was sometimes insignificant. On the contrary, the results showed an insignificant effect of government ownership on audit quality in Egyptian and Saudi companies, or the effect was sometimes significant. The study results may help investors and stakeholders understand the ownership structure’s role as one of the internal governance mechanisms on audit quality. Studies show the effectiveness of governance mechanisms, whether internal or external, according to the institutional environment from one country to another. It also contributes to the use of various indicators to measure the quality of auditing and the quality of financial reports, such as returning the financial statements as an indicator of financial reports and an indicator of audit quality at the same time.
