Government subsidies, rent-seeking and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.31
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2021, Issue #4, pp. 380-392
- Cited by
- 473 Views
-
101 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Despite a large number of government subsidies, Chinese listed companies still face numerous challenges. This requires research into the effects of government subsidies on corporate investment efficiency. The paper provides empirical evidence to investigate investment efficiency and enriches the study on the interactions between government intervention, rent-seeking, and ownership structure. Generalized least square (GLS) models with fixed effects were constructed using 2012–2020 data from 869 Chinese listed A-share non-financial firms. Results show that government subsidies received by listed companies significantly damage investment efficiency (β = .138, p < .01). This can be attributed to their rent-seeking behaviors to obtain subsidies, which also significantly harms investment efficiency (β = .915, p < .05). Government subsidies are also found to significantly mediate the impact of rent-seeking on investment efficiency. In three-step regression for testing mediating effect, coefficients are 0.475, 0.915, and 0.131 at the level of 1%, 5%, and 5%, respectively. Furthermore, ownership structure shows a moderating effect in the relationship between subsidies and investment efficiency. The management shareholding ratio significantly reinforces the negative impact (β = 1.369, p < .01), while the institutional shareholding ratio shows no significant moderating effect (β = 0.0571, p = n.s). Non-state-owned enterprises show a more significant negative impact (β = 0.17, p < .05) than state-owned enterprises (β = 0.148, p < .1). Finally, the study tests the above relationships for companies in the manufacturing industry that receive the most percentage of government subsidies in China, and the results are robust.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, H21
-
References44
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Correlations and VIF
- Table 3. Hausman test
- Table 4. Regression for Model I
- Table 5. Regression results for Model II to Model VI
-
- Angelopoulos, A., & Philippopoulos, A. (2019). Rent Seeking Worsens Economic Outcomes and Increases Wealth Inequality.
- Arifin, T. (2019). Corporate Political Connections: Impact on Cost of Debt, Corporate Taxes, and Investment Efficiency.
- Bai, Y., Hua, C., Jiao, J., Yang, M., & Li, F. (2018). Green efficiency and environmental subsidy: Evidence from thermal power firms in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 49-61.
- Cai, D., Yang, Z., Jiang, W., Xu, Q., B, D. C., Yang, Z., & Jiang, W. (2018). The Empirical Evidence of the Effect on the Enterprises R&D from Government Subsidies, Political Connections and Rent-Seeking. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, 1, 499–510. Springer, Cham.
- Chang, K., Wan, Q., Lou, Q., Chen, Y., & Wang, W. (2019). Green fiscal policy and firms’ investment efficiency: New insights into firm-level panel data from the renewable energy industry in China. Renewable Energy, 151, 589-597.
- Chen, N., Sung, H.-C., & Yang, J. (2017). Ownership structure, corporate governance and investment efficiency of Chinese listed firms. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(3), 266-282.
- Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259-271.
- China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2021). The Administrative Punishment of China Securities Regulatory Commission in 2020.
- Claro, S. (2006). Supporting inefficient firms with capital subsidies: China and Germany in the 1990s. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(2), 377-401.
- Cook, K. A., Romi, A. M., Sánchez, D., & Sánchez, J. M. (2019). The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 46(3-4), 494-537.
- Deng, L., Jiang, P., Li, S., & Liao, M. (2017). Government intervention and firm investment. Journal of Corporate Finance.
- Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797-815.
- Dong, N., Wang, F., Zhang, J., & Zhou, J. (2020). Ownership structure and real earnings management: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(3), 106733.
- Du, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2016). Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: Being young, small or private in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(1), 22-38.
- Erokhin, V. (2020). Rising Economic Powers among Economies in Transition: Is There Enough Space on the Global Market? Foreign Direct Investments: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2009-2034.
- Fan, Y., & Fu, H. (2020). Institutional investors, selling pressure and crash risk: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 42, 100670.
- Grafton, R. Q., & Williams, J. (2020). Rent-seeking behaviour and regulatory capture in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Journal International Journal of Water Resources Development, 36(2-3), 484-504.
- Guoa, L., & Platikanov, S. (2019). Institutional ownership and corporate governance of public companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101180.
- Hao, Y., & Lu, J. (2018). The Impact of Government Intervention on Corporate Investment Allocations and Efficiency: Evidence from China. Financial Management, 47(2), 383-419.
- Jin, Z., Shang, Y., & Xu, J. (2018). The impact of government subsidies on private R & D and firm performance: Does ownership matter in China’s manufacturing industry? Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7), 2205.
- Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 64(3), 291-303.
- Kwon, T. (2015). Rent and rent-seeking in renewable energy support policies: feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 676-681.
- Li, Q., Wang, M., & Xiangli, L. (2020). Do government subsidies promote new-energy firms’ innovation? Evidence from dynamic and threshold models. Journal of Cleaner Production.
- Li, S., Wu, H., & Jiang, X. (2018). Rent-seeking and firm value: Chinese evidence. Business and Politics, 20(2), 239-272.
- Liang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2017). Anti-Corruption, Government Subsidies and Corporate Innovation Investment – Based on the Perspective of Rent-Seeking Theory. Chinese Studies, Scientific Research Publishing, 6(01), 44-54.
- Liu, B., Lin, Y., Chan, K. C., & Fung, H. G. (2018). The dark side of rent-seeking: The impact of rent-seeking on earnings management. Journal of Business Research, 91, 94-107.
- Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The Efficiency of Equity in Organizational Decision Processes. The New Theory of the Firm, 80(2), 154-159.
- Raghunandan, A. (2018). Government Subsidies and Corporate Fraud, SSRN Electronic Journal, London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE).
- Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2-3), 159-189.
- Rose-Ackerman, P. S. (2017). Political corruption and reform in democracies: theoretical perspectives. Comparing Political Corruption and Clientelism, 65-82.
- Sakawa, H., & Watanabel, N. (2020). Institutional Ownership and Firm Performance under Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance. Sustainability, 12(3).
- Shin, K., Choy, M., Lee, C., & Park, G. (2019). Government R & D subsidy and additionality of biotechnology firms: The case of the South Korean Biotechnology Industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI AG, 11(6).
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995-1025.
- Tao, Q., Sun, Y., Zhu, Y., & Yang, X. (2017). Political Connections and Government Subsidies: Evidence from Financially Distressed Firms in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(8), 1854-1868.
- Vijayakumaran, R. (2021). Impact of managerial ownership on investment and liquidity constraints: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 55.
- Wong, T. J. (2016). Corporate Governance Research on Listed Firms in China: Institutions, Governance and Accountability. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 9(4), 259-326.
- Xie, S., Xu, Y., Zeng, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). Ultimate parent board reform and corporate overinvestment: a quasi-natural experiment study. Accounting and Finance, 58(5), 1469-1501.
- Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101, 697-706.
- Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal–Principal Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196-220.
- Yu, X., Yao, Y., Zheng, H., & Zhang, L. (2020). The role of political connection on overinvestment of Chinese energy firms. Energy Economics, 85, 104516.
- Zhang, H., An, R., & Zhong, Q. (2019). Anti-corruption, government subsidies, and investment efficiency. China Journal of Accounting Research, 12(1), 113-133.
- Zhang, H., Li, L., Zhou, D., & Zhou, P. (2014). Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China. Renewable Energy, 63, 330-336.
- Zhang, M., Gao, S., Guan, X., & Jiang, F. (2014). Controlling Shareholder-Manager Collusion and Tunneling: Evidence from China. Corporate Governance, 22(6), 440-459.
- Zhu, Z., & Liao, H. (2019). Do subsidies improve the financial performance of renewable energy companies? Evidence from China. Natural Hazards, 95(1-2), 241-256.