Global imperatives for development of international production networks: case of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.06
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #1, pp. 57-69
- Cited by
- 899 Views
-
180 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper studies the theoretical and methodological principles, regularities, and new trends in the formation of international production networks (IPNs) in the global economic space. It determines the imperatives of their development, substantiating the priority nature of integrating national actors into IPNs. The author applies the methods of fuzzy clustering and classification using the artificial intelligence technologies to data on the dynamics of key economic and technological markers of 35 countries in the 2007–2016 time frame.
The work identifies a clustering-like structure in the sample country set; allowing determining patterns in the correlation between a country’s manifested potential for ascending into and within international production networks and certain development and international integration indicators. The sample is thus grouped into six clusters based on the degree of integration into IPNs. Due to the use of classification analysis, the rules for assigning a country to a particular cluster were obtained. According to the results of the study, it was concluded that the main imperative for the development of international production networks is innovative development. The overall concept of localization of Ukrainian enterprises at all stages of value creation within networks was offered.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C80, F12, F62, L14
-
References22
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Distribution of countries by clusters by 2016
- Table 2. Classification rules of a country’s membership in a particular cluster and assessment of the model’s accuracy
- Table 3. The rules of a country’s belonging to the 2nd cluster in comparison with real values for Ukraine in 2016
- Table 4. Reliability of classification analysis
- Table 5. Indicators’ weight in attributing a country to a particular cluster
-
- Arndt, S. W., & Kierzkowski, H. (2001). Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy (268 p.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Baldwin, R. E. (2012). Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They are Going (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP9103) (37 p.).
- Cingolani, I., Iapadre, L., & Tajoli, L. (2018). International production networks and the world trade structure. International Economics, 153, 11-33.
- Coe, N. M. (2018). Global production networks. In G. Cook, J. Johns, F. McDonald, J. Beaverstock, & N. Pandit (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Geography of International Business (pp. 147-160). Routledge.
- Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K. L., & Linden, G. (2008). Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod And Notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 81-116.
- Del Prete, D., Giovannetti, G., & Marvasi, E. (2016). North African Countries and Firms in International Production Networks (EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2016/26). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme-216.
- Díaz-Mora, C., & López, E. G. (2019). Product Complexity in International Production Networks: Comparing EU Core and Old and New EU Periphery. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(4), 950-966.
- Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2018). Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva: Cornell, INSEAD, and WIPO.
- Hermida, C. C., Xavier, C. L., & Silva, G. J. (2017). Do international fragmentation of production and the participation in Global Value Chains lead to higher growth rates? In II Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação (pp. 756-775). São Paulo: Blucher Engineering Proceedings.
- Kagermann, H., Lukas, W., & Wahlster, W. (2011). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution.
- Koopman, R, Powers, W., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2010). Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains (NBER Working Paper 16426).
- Koopman, R., Wang, W., & Wei, S.-J. (2014). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459-494.
- Koval, V., Duginets, G., Plekhanova, O., Antonov, A., & Petrova, M. (2019). On the supranational and national level of global value chain management. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1922-1937.
- MacDougall, W. (2014). Industrie 4.0. Smart Manufacturing for the Future. Berlin: Germany Trade and Invest Gesellschaft für Außenwirtschaft und Standortmarketing mbH.
- OECD-WTO. (2012). Trade in Value-Added: Concepts, Methodologies and Challenges (Joint OECD-WTO Note).
- Pomfret, R., & Sourdin, P. (2018). Value chains in Europe and Asia: Which countries participate? International Economics, 153, 34-41.
- Smith, M., Gorgoni, S., & Cronin, B. (2019). International production and trade in a high-tech industry: A multilevel network analysis. Social Networks, 59, 50-60.
- UNCTAD. (2018). Statistics Database UNCTAD.
- UNECE. (2015). Guide to Measuring Global Production (159 p.). United nations, New York and Geneva.
- United Nations. (2017). International Trade Statistics Yearbook 2016.
- World Bank. (2017a). Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development (Global Value Chain Development Report). Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
- World Bank. (2017b). Doing Business 2016. Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency (World Bank Group Flagship Report) (338 p.). Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.