From readiness to excellence: The role of digital enablement and innovation in life insurance performance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ins.15(2).2024.04
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2024, Issue #2, pp. 35-46
- 92 Views
-
12 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
With digital transformation becoming a key focus for businesses globally, the Indonesian life insurance industry faces increasing pressure to adopt digital strategies to remain competitive. This study examines the relationships between technology adoption readiness, digital enablement, and life insurance performance and explores the moderating effect of innovation capability. A quantitative approach was employed, gathering data through a structured questionnaire distributed to senior executives from 43 life insurance companies in Indonesia. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS, the analysis reveals that digital enablement significantly enhances life insurance performance, driven by the readiness of companies to adopt technology. However, the moderating role of innovation capability was found to be less impactful, suggesting that innovation contributes to performance but does not substantially influence the relationship between digital enablement and life insurance performance. These findings provide valuable insights for life insurance companies in Indonesia, highlighting the importance of investing in technology adoption and digital integration while continuing to develop innovation capabilities to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O33, G22, M15
-
References29
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Measurement model result
-
- Table 1. Respondent’s demography
- Table 2. Convergent validity and reliability
- Table 3. Fornell-Larcker criterion
- Table 4. Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio
- Table 5. Path coefficients and hypothesis testing
- Table 6. Coefficient of determination (R²)
- Table A1. Questionnaire
-
- Agbehadji, I. E., Millham, R. C., Awuzie, B. O., & Ngowi, A. B. (2022). Stakeholder’s Perspective of Digital Technologies and Platforms Towards Smart Campus Transition: Challenges and Prospects. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1547. Cham: Springer.
- Agustia, D., Haryanto, S. D., Permatasari, Y., & Midiantari, P. N. (2022). Product innovation, firm performance and moderating role of technology capabilities. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 252-265.
- Balasubramanian, R., Libarikian, A., & McElhaney, D. (2021). Insurance 2030 – The impact of AI on the future of insurance. McKinsey & Company.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Caro-Gonzalez, A. (2024). Establishing a Culture of Innovation and Risk-Taking. In Transformative Governance for the Future. SpringerBriefs in Business. Cham: Springer.
- Chauhan, C., Parida, V., & Dhir, A. (2022). Linking circular economy and digitalisation technologies: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121508.
- Chen, W., & Srinivasan, S. (2023). Going digital: Implications for firm value and performance. Social Science Research Network.
- Fagerberg, J., & Hutschenreiter, G. (2020). Coping with societal challenges: Lessons for innovation policy governance. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 279-305.
- Fares, O. H., Butt, I., & Lee, S. H. M. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence in the banking sector: A systematic literature review. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28(4), 835-852.
- Grandinetti, R., Ciasullo, M., Paiola, M., & Schiavone, F. (2020). Fourth industrial revolution, digital servitization and relationship quality in Italian B2B manufacturing firms: An exploratory study. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 647-671.
- Hamid, R. A. (2022). The role of employees’ technology readiness, job meaningfulness and proactive personality in adaptive performance. Sustainability, 14(23), 15696.
- Hanelt, A., Firk, S., Hildebrandt, B., & Kolbe, L. (2020). Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3-26.
- Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. (2020). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177-195.
- Liepert, M. (2024). Increasing the EBITDA of private equity portfolio company through digital enablement. Economics of Development, 23(1), 70-77.
- Moussa, F. L., Moussa, M. L., Alharbi, H. A., Omer, T., Sofiany, H. A., Oqdi, Y. A., Alblowi, B. H., & Alblowi, S. H. (2023). Telehealth readiness of healthcare providers during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare, 11(6), 842.
- Mubarra, S., Mubarik, S. & Qasim, J. (2023). Interplay of intellectual capital and digital transformation to enhance innovation performance. British Journal of Management and Marketing Studies, 6(1), 113-126.
- Noël, F., Alpan, G., & Mangione, F. (2020). A complete digital chain to enable the digital twin of a shop floor. In F. Ameri, K. E. Stecke, G. von Cieminski, & D. Kiritsis (Eds.), Advances in production management systems. The path to intelligent, collaborative and sustainable manufacturing (pp. 88-95). Springer.
- Orser, B., Riding, A., & Li, Y. (2019). Technology adoption and gender-inclusive entrepreneurship education and training. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 273-298.
- Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2023). Indonesian insurance statistics. Financial Services Authority.
- Pierri, N., & Timmer, Y. (2022). The importance of technology in banking during a crisis (FEDS Working Paper No. 2022-20).
- Redep, N. B. (2021). Comparative overview of the digital preparedness of education systems in selected CEE countries. Center for Policy Studies, CEU Democracy Institute.
- Schiffer, S., Mocker, M., & Teubner, A. (2023). Managing IT challenges when scaling digital innovations. MIS Quarterly Executive, 22(3), Article 5.
- Scholkmann, A. B. (2020). Resistance to (Digital) Change: Individual, Systemic, and Learning-Related Perspectives. In Ifenthaler, D., Hofhues, S., Egloffstein, M., and Helbig, C. (Eds.), Digital Transformation of Learning Organizations (pp. 219-236). Cham: Springer.
- Senadjki, A., Au Yong, H. N., Ganapathy, T., & Ogbeibu, S. (2024). Unlocking the potential: The impact of digital leadership on firms’ performance through digital transformation. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 4(2), 161-177.
- Tan, A. B. C., Van Dun, D. H., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2021). Innovative work behavior in Singapore evoked by transformational leaders through innovation support and readiness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 697-712.
- Teece, J. D. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233-253.
- Wolf, M. G., Nylund-Gibson, K., Dowdy, E., & Furlong, M. (2019). An analytic approach for deciding between 4- and 6-point Likert-type response options. UC Santa Barbara Project Covitality.
- Zhong, Y., & Moon, H. C. (2023). Investigating the impact of Industry 4.0 technology through a TOE-based innovation model. Systems, 11(6), 277.
- Zobell, S. (2018). Why digital transformations fail: Closing the $900 billion hole in enterprise strategy. Forbes.