Fiscal attractiveness of Portuguese municipalities
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.01
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2023, Issue #2, pp. 1-16
- Cited by
- 498 Views
-
283 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The modeling of the municipalities’ tax burden is one of the most relevant issues, especially in terms of municipal competitiveness. It challenges the definition and delimitation of local authorities’ taxing powers. This study aims to analyze the level of taxation of Portuguese municipalities and how local policies contribute to the definition of a ranking of fiscally more competitive municipalities. The paper applies quantitative methods based on the fiscal information made available by municipalities. It has been determined that it is possible to classify municipalities as more or less competitive through their tax supply, mainly at the level of their ability to set tax rates. In 2021, compared to 2020, the most fiscally competitive municipalities were located in the Autonomous Region of the Azores (Corvo (95.128%); Vila do Pico (95.128%); Madalena (95.128%); Povoação (95.078%); Santa Cruz das Flores (95.072%); Angra do Heroísmo (95.044%); Nordeste (95.036%); Vila Franca do Campo (95.036%); Horta (95.017%); and Ponta Delgada (95.017%)). The study also verified the maintenance of fiscal competitiveness among the most fiscally attractive municipalities, despite having several types of fiscal attraction policy options at their disposal, always conditioned by national legislation. This means fiscal policy is an instrument of competition for attracting companies, people, and productive investment to local municipalities. The existence of an international dogma favorable to the increasing attribution of administrative and financial autonomy to local authorities mainly supports this phenomenon.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H30, H71, H77, K34
-
References42
-
Tables2
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. The 10 more (green) and less (red) fiscally attractive municipalities, 2017–2021
- Figure 2. The more (green) and less (red) fiscally attractive municipalities by districts, 2020–2021
- Figure 3. The more (green) and less (red) fiscally attractive municipalities by districts, 2018–2019
- Figure 4. The more (green) and less (red) fiscally attractive municipalities by districts, 2017
- Figure 5. Gaussian distribution curves of the levels of fiscal attractiveness (2017 to 2021)
-
- Table 1. The 10 more and less fiscally attractive municipalities (2021–2017)
- Table 2. Results by districts and autonomous regions (2017–2021)
-
- Bahl, R. (1981). The impact of local tax policy on urban economic development (ECON Publications Report 108). Georgia State University.
- Bartolini, D., Stossberg, S., & Blöchliger, H. (2016). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1330). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Bauer, M. (2020). Unintended and undesired consequences: the impact of OECD pillar I and II proposals on small open economies (ECIPE Occasional Paper). Brussels: European Centre for International Political Economy.
- Blöchliger, H. (2015). The challenge of measuring fiscal decentralization. In E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of Multilevel Finance (pp. 617-632). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Blöchliger, H., & Pinero-Campos, J. (2011). Tax competition between sub-central governments (OECD Working Paper on Fiscal Federalism No. 13).
- Catarino, J. R. (2020). Finanças públicas e direito financeiro. Coimbra: Almedina. (In Portuguese).
- Cibils, V., & Ter-Minassian, T. (Eds.). (2015). Decentralizing revenue in Latin America: Why and how. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.
- Coimbra, M., Costa, J., & Carvalho, A. (2011). A concorrência fiscal entre os municípios portugueses. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 28, 27-38. (In Portuguese).
- Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79-102.
- Devereux, M. (2006). The impact of taxation on the location of capital, firms and profit: A survey of empirical evidence (Working Paper 07/02). Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
- Edwards, C., & Mitchell, D. (2008). Global tax revolution: The rise of global tax competition and the battle to defend it . Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.
- Freire, M. E., & Sinet, A. (2014). Achieving greater transparency and accountability: Measuring municipal finances performances and paving a path for reforms. In C. Farvacque-Vitkovic & M. Kopanyi (Eds.), Municipal finances: a handbook for local governments (pp. 379-446). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.
- Gannon, J. F. Jr. (1921). Sources of municipal revenue. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation under the Auspices of the National Tax Association, 14 (pp. 222-228).
- Giambiagi, F., & Além, A. (2001). Finanças públicas: Teoria e prática no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus. (In Portuguese).
- Halleux, J., Hendricks, A., & Nordahl, B. (2022). Public value capture of increasing property values across Europe. ETH Zurich.
- Hendrick, R. (2011). Managing the fiscal metropolis: The financial policies, practices, and health of suburban municipalities. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
- Hesse, M. (2021). Higher taxes for fiscal consolidation? Expected and unexpected effects of municipal tax policy. International Advances in Economic Research, 27, 287-302.
- Jametti, M. (2014). Tax competition and direct democracy in local public finance – Empirical work on Switzerland (CESifo DICE Report 1/2014).
- Jones, C., & Temouri, Y. (2016). The determinants of tax haven FDI. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 237-250.
- Kangasharju, A., Moisio, A., Reulier, E., & Rocaboy, Y. (2006). Tax competition among municipalities in Finland. Urban Public Economics Review, 5, 12-23.
- Keller, S., & Schanz, D. (2013). Measuring tax attractiveness across countries (Discussion Paper No. 143). Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre (arqus), Berlin.
- Larin, G., Boudreau, D., & Rouleau, S. (2013). Les prix de transfert au Canada: Une évaluation quantitative de leur utilisation par les entreprises multinationals. Sherbrooke: Chaire de recherche en fiscalité et en finances publiques. (In French).
- Liu, Y., Tai, H., & Yang, C. (2020). Fiscal incentives and local tax competition: Evidence from China. The World Economy, 43(12), 3340-3356.
- Lyytikäinen, T. (2012). Tax competition among local governments: Evidence from a property tax reform in Finland. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7-8), 584-595.
- Madura, J. (2014). International financial management (13th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
- Musgrave, R. (1971). Economics of fiscal federalism. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 10(4), 3-13.
- Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.
- OECD. (2008). OECD territorial reviews: Portugal 2008.
- OECD. (2013). Fiscal federalism 2014: Making decentralisation work.
- OECD. (2015). Policy framework for investment, 2015 edition. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Overesch, M., & Wamser, G. (2010). Corporate tax planning and thin-capitalization rules: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Applied Economics, 42(5), 563-573.
- Plummer, J. (2002). Focusing partnerships: A sourcebook for municipal capacity building in public-private partnerships (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
- Rosen, H. (2007). Studies in state and local public finance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
- Sandoz, L. (2019). Mobilities of the highly skilled towards Switzerland: The role of intermediaries in defining “wanted immigrants”. New York City: Springer International Publishing.
- Santos, A., & Palma, C. (2006). A regulação internacional da concorrência fiscal prejudicial. Cadernos Ciência e Técnica Fiscal, 395, 9-36. (In Portuguese).
- Sgambati, S., Carpentieri, G., & Gargiulo, C. (2022). Measuring urban competitiveness through the lens of sustainability: An application at the urban districts level in the city of Naples (Italy). In Computational science and its applications: ICCSA 2022 Workshops. Malaga, Spain.
- Sieg, H. (2020). Urban economics and fiscal policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Tanzi, V. (1992). Fiscal policies in economies in transition. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
- Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
- United Nations. (2015). The challenge of local government financing in developing countries. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
- Vélez-Hagan, J. (2019). The paradox of fiscal austerity: How cutting deficits saved the modern world. Pennsylvania: Lexington Books.