Financial institutions performance evaluation in a unique developing market using TOPSIS approach

  • Published March 24, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Sami Al Kharusi , Eşref Savaş Başci
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(1).2017.06
  • Article Info
    Volume 12 2017, Issue #1, pp. 54-59
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
  • 1213 Views
  • 378 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Using Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS) approach for the data from 2011 to 2015, the authors investigate the financial performance of 16 different financial institutions in Oman that include nine commercial banks, three specialized banks, two investment companies, and two finance companies. They find that the one investment company, Dhofar International Development and Investment Holding Co., was more efficient in 2015 and 2011. Moreover, Oman Housing Bank was more efficient in 2013 and 2014, while Ahli Bank was more efficient in the year 2012. In contrast, Bank Muscat that has the largest total assets was ranked number 16 for the years 2013, 2014 and 2015. As a result of Spearman’s Rho (Rank-Order) Correlation, all ranked results are related to other years. If a bank is at placement in level, it can be affected by year before or year after. But Oman banks’ correlations shows that there are 2 different periods as effecting one year to the other.

Keywords: financial institutions performance, TOPSIS, emerging markets, efficiency, decision making criteria.
JEL Classification: G21, G23, L25

view full abstract hide full abstract
  • References
    19
  • Tables
    4
  • Figures
    1
    • Fig. 1. Illustration of TOPSIS
    • Table 1. Total assets of financial institutions in Oman
    • Table 2. All variables for TOPSIS analysis
    • Table 3. All ranked results for financial institutions from 2011 to 2015
    • Table 4. Spearman’s Rho Correlations
    • Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C.K. & Sahay, P. (1997). The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks, European Journal of operational research, 98 (2), pp. 332-345.
    • Hasan, I. & Marton, K. (2003). Development and efficiency of the banking sector in a transitional economy: Hungarian experience, Journal of Banking & Finance, 27 (12), pp. 2249-2271.
    • Hwang, C.L., Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y. (1993). A new approach for multiple objective decision making, Computers and Operational Research, 20, pp. 889-899.
    • Hwang, C.L., Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y. (1993). A new approach for multiple objective decision making, Computers and Operational Research, 20, pp. 889-899.
    • Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
    • Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
    • Kaya, Y.T. (2001). CAMELS analysis in Turkish banking sector, BRSA MSPD working report, p. 6.
    • Kraft, E. & Tırtıroğlu, D. (1998). Bank efficiency in Croatia: A stochastic-frontier analysis, Journal of comparative economics, 26 (2), pp. 282-300.
    • Li, S., Liu, F., Liu, S. & Whitmore, G.A. (2001). Comparative performance of Chinese commercial banks: Analysis, findings and policy implications, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 16 (2), pp. 149-170.
    • Lin, X. & Zhang, Y. (2009). Bank ownership reform and bank performance in China, Journal of Banking & Finance, 33 (1), pp. 20-29.
    • Mercan, M., Reisman, A., Yolalan, R. & Emel, A.B. (2003). The effect of scale and mode of ownership on the financial performance of the Turkish banking sector: results of a DEA-based analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37 (3), pp. 185-202.
    • Mertens, A. & Urga, G. (2001). Efficiency, scale and scope economies in the Ukrainian banking sector in 1998, Emerging Markets Review, 2 (3), pp. 292-308.
    • Murillo‐Zamorano, L.R. (2004). Economic efficiency and frontier techniques, Journal of Economic surveys, 18 (1), pp. 33-77.
    • Ravi, V., Kurniawan, H., Thai, P.N.K. & Kumar, P.R. (2008). Soft computing system for bank performance prediction, Applied soft computing, 8 (1), pp. 305-315.
    • Saha, A. & Ravisankar, T.S. (2000). Rating of Indian commercial banks: a DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 124 (1), pp. 187-203.
    • Staub, R.B., de Souza, G.D.S. & Tabak, B.M. (2010). Evolution of bank efficiency in Brazil: A DEA approach, European journal of operational research, 202 (1), pp. 204-213.
    • Tecles, P.L. & Tabak, B.M. (2010). Determinants of bank efficiency: The case of Brazil, European Journal of Operational Research, 207 (3), pp. 1587-1598.
    • Tözüm, H. (2002). Performance evaluation of banks, Active: Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, pp. 1-9.
    • Yoon, K. (1987). A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations, Journal of Operational Research Society, 38, pp. 277-286.
Download Preview
Close
Banks and Bank Systems
Banks and Bank Systems