Exploring the effectiveness of social control mechanisms in fostering citizen involvement in rural local budgeting: The Kazakhstani perspective
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.04
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2023, Issue #2, pp. 43-54
- Cited by
- 342 Views
-
193 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this study is to explore the involvement of citizens in the administration of local budgets, which significantly contribute to the financial and economic independence of rural areas. The study presents the findings of a sociological research conducted in the Turkestan region, Kazakhstan. The survey included 259 rural residents from 14 rural districts and two significant cities in the region, all aged 18 and above and permanent residents of these areas.
The analysis is based on the survey results, focusing on the overall level of citizens’ engagement in decision-making regarding local budget formation and distribution in rural areas. The study reveals a low level of citizen participation in managing the local budget. While general meetings and local gatherings serve as primary avenues for citizen involvement, only 79.9% of respondents reported participating in budget discussions, with only 20.1% of their opinions considered during budget allocation.
Finally, the study identifies several factors that negatively affect effective citizen participation in local budget management. These factors include a lack of timely awareness and information about upcoming planning and budget meetings (56.4%), insufficient transparency in the actions of local executive leaders (Akims) (14.3%), bureaucratic complexity and a formal approach to budget discussions (3.5%), and low levels of citizen trust in rural district Akims (5.4%).
Acknowledgment
This study is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BR18574203).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H61, R58, I10, H75
-
References31
-
Tables2
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Reasons why citizens did not participate in meetings and gatherings of the local community (%)
- Figure 2. Satisfaction of the population with the degree of participation in the discussion on the village budget (in %)
- Figure 3. Factors affecting the effectiveness of local budget management (in %)
- Figure 4. Forms of citizen interaction with local government bodies (%)
- Figure 5. Forms for evaluating the effectiveness of budget execution (%)
-
- Table 1. Structure of rural budgets of Turkestan region (tenge, in millions)
- Table 2. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
-
- Ardanaz, M., Otálvaro-Ramírez, S., & Scartascini, C. (2023). Does information about citizen participation initiatives increase political trust? World Development, 162, 106132.
- Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Survey dataset on citizens’ perspective regarding government’s use of social media for provision of quality information and citizens online political participation in Pakistan. Data in Brief, 32, 106311.
- Bokayev, B., & Amirova, A. (2023). Reforming the civil service system in Kazakhstan: Three innovative solutions and priorities. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 28(2), 1-19.
- Bokayev, B., Davletbayeva, Z., Amirova, A., Rysbekova, Z., Torebekova, Z., & Jussupova, G. (2021). Transforming e-government in Kazakhstan: A citizen-centric approach. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 26(1).
- Bokayev, B., Zhanzhigitova, Z., & Sadykova, K. (2022). Effective communication strategy to mitigate citizen complaints: Case from Kazakhstan. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 27(3).
- Carcaba, A., Arrondo, R., & Gonzalez, E. (2022). Does good local governance improve subjective well-being? European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 100192.
- Correia, D., Feio, J. E., Marques, J., & Teixeira, L. (2023). Participatory methodology guidelines to promote citizens participation in decision-making: Evidence based on a Portuguese case study. Cities, 135, 104213.
- Department of Finance and State Assets of Turkestan region. (2022). Structure of rural budgets of Turkestan region. Requested by the official letter No. 03/3046, December 9, 2021. (In Russian).
- Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437-447.
- Fekete, A., Aslam, A., Madruga de Brito, M., Dominguez, I., Fernando, N., Illing, C. J., Apil, K., Mahdavian, F., Norf, C., Platt, S., Santi, P. A., & Tempels, B. (2021). Increasing flood risk awareness and warning readiness by participation – But who understands what under ‘participation’? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 57, 102157.
- Gorska, A., Dobija, D., Grossi, G., & Staniszewska, Z. (2022). Getting through COVID-19 together: Understanding local governments’ social media communication. Cities, 121, 103453.
- Gubnitsyn, A. (2009). Ot konsultatsiy k dialogu: Opyt Kanady v grazhdanskom uchastii [From consultations to dialogue: Canada’s experience in citizen participation]. Issues of State and Municipal Administration, 3, 155-166. (In Russian).
- Johnson, B., Jones, P., & Reitano, V. (2021). Stakeholder networks and inclusive public participation mechanisms in the public budgeting process. Urban Governance, 1(2), 98-106.
- Kamrowska-Zaluska, D. (2016). Participatory budgeting in Poland – Missing link in urban regeneration process. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1996-2000.
- Kim, S., & Schachter, H. (2013). Citizen participation in the budget process and local government accountability: Case studies of organizational learning from the United States and South Korea. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 456-471.
- Legislation of Kazakhstan. (2012, November 28). Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazahstan “Ob utverzhdenii Koncepcii razvitija mestnogo samoupravlenija v Respublike Kazahstan” [Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On approval of the Concept of Development of local self-government in the Republic of Kazakhstan”]. (In Russian).
- Legislation of Kazakhstan. (2022, March 7). O provedenii vstrech akimov s naseleniyem [On holding meetings of akims with the population]. (In Russian).
- Lim, S., Mazhar, M., Malek, J., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2021). The right or wrong to the city? Understanding citizen participation in the pre- and post-COVID-19 eras in Malaysia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(4), 238.
- Ling, T.-Y., Lin, J.-S., Lin, C.-T., & Lin, C.-H. (2022). Citizen engagement under climate change-local communication practice toward resilience. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100184.
- Lourenço, R. (2023). Government transparency: Monitoring public policy accumulation and administrative overload. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101762.
- Manes-Rossi, F., Brusca, I., Orelli, R. L., Lorson, P., & Haustein, E. (2023). Features and drivers of citizen participation: Insights from participatory budgeting in three European cities. Public Management Review, 25(2), 201-223.
- Marin, R. (2015). The local political elites in East-Central Europe: Between the legacy of the past and the decentralization of the present. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 183, 30-39.
- Ogbe, M. (2022). Citizens’ participation in petroleum revenue management in Ghana. The Extractive Industries and Society, 12, 101175.
- Padeiro, M., Bueno-Larraz, B., & Freitas, A. (2021). Local governments’ use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Portugal. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101620.
- Pang, Y., Xie, S., & Jiang, S. (2011). The application of nested-game theory in the public participation mechanism in the decision-making of large engineering projects. Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 142-146.
- Rania, Q. (2017). Using social hub media to expand public participation in municipal urban plans. Procedia Engineering, 198, 34-42.
- Rollason, E., Bracken, L., Hardy, R., & Large, A. (2018). Evaluating the success of public participation in integrated catchment management. Journal of Environmental Management, 228, 267-278.
- Sedmihradská, L. (2015). Budget transparency in Czech local government. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 598-606.
- Tang, S.-Y. (2021). Rethinking local and regional governance in China: An institutional design and development perspective. Urban Governance, 1(1), 51-58.
- Yuvitsa, N., Kadralieva, A., Parmanov, N., & Imanbekova, A. (2019). Sodejstvie mestnym soobshhestvam v razvitii uchastija v mestnom samoupravlenii i processe prinjatija reshenij na mestnom urovne [Assistance to local communities in the development of participation in local self-government and the decision-making process at the local level]. Nur-Sultan. (In Russian).
- Zhang, Y., & Yang, K. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(2), 289-317.