Evaluating the economic and ecological effects of investment projects: A new model and its application to smartphone manufacturing in Europe
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.22
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2021, Issue #4, pp. 252-265
- Cited by
- 760 Views
-
162 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Despite market volatility in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and a decline in global investment flows to 2005 levels, sustainable development funds continued to grow. These data indicate a change in development vectors: now leading investors are guided by technologies for sustainable growth. The purpose of this paper is to determine the optimal model for evaluating investment projects in terms of their economic and environmental effects on the development of the region. The proposed technique is being tested for an investment project aimed at developing the production of mobile phones in Europe. As shown, the analysis of the location of the production of smartphones in Europe for subsequent implementation in the European market has a number of advantages and is more beneficial in terms of environmental and economic effects for the region. First, from an economic point of view, this leads to an increase in the volume of attracted investments, a decrease in operating costs for international logistics, the creation of new jobs and qualifications for the population. In addition, it is important to be able to actively implement circular business models that will reuse lithium-ion phone batteries, which will lead to a decrease in the need for cobalt as a raw material, as well as lead to an increase in the level of recycling of e-waste and the circularity of the European economy. Also, such investment projects open up great opportunities for manufacturers from a marketing point of view, creating bonuses for a positive image and preferences for a “local green producer”.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F64, F21, O31
-
References30
-
Tables3
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Key stages in preparing of an investment model using environmental indicators
- Figure 2. The structure and dynamics of the capacity of the mobile phone market in the EU (27)
- Figure 3. Sales of mobile phones per capita in the EU (27)
- Figure 4. Carbon footprint of the smartphone market in the EU (27)
- Figure 5. Cobalt imports by China for the period 2002–2020 (ths t)
-
- Table 1. Matrix of economic and green impact effects
- Table 2. Comparative matrix of economic and green impact effects
- Table A1. Key indices of the development of the mobile phone market in the EU
-
- Bakker, C. A., & Kuijer, L. (2014). More disposable than ever? Consequences of non-removable batteries in mobile devices. In Proceedings of CARE Innovation 2014 “Going Green” Conference. Vienna, Austria, 17-20 November 2014. Austrian Society for Systems Engineering and Automation.
- Beulque, R., & Aggeri, F. (2016, July). Circular Business Model Innovation: Key Patterns and Challenges to unleash recycling value creation potential. In EGOS.
- Calero, C., García-Rodríguez De Guzmán, I., Moraga, M. A., & García, F. (2019) Is software sustainability considered in the CSR of software industry? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(5), 439-459.
- Chowdhury, C. R., Chatterjee, A., Sardar, A., Agarwal, S., & Nath, A. (2013). A comprehensive study on cloud green computing: To reduce carbon footprints using clouds. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 3(8), 78-85.
- Cramer, J. M. (2020). Implementing the circular economy in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area: The interplay between market actors mediated by transition brokers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2857-2870.
- Desa, U. N. (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.
- European Commiission. (n.d.). EU Emissions Trading System. European Commission.
- Eurostat. (n.d.). European Statistical Dashboard.
- Gao, X., & Zhang, W. (2013). Foreign investment, innovation capacity and environmental efficiency in China. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5-6), 1040-1046.
- Gupta, U., Kim, Y. G., Lee, S., Tse, J., Lee, H. H. S., Wei, G. Y., Brooks, D., & Wu, C. J. (2021, February). Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computing. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) (pp. 854-867). IEEE.
- Han, J., Heshmati, A., & Rashidghalam, M. (2020). Circular economy business models with a focus on servitization. Sustainability, 12(21), 8799.
- Honest Mobile. (n.d.). What’s the carbon footprint of my smartphone? Aug 25, 2020.
- Jones, N. (2018). How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature, 561(7722), 163-167.
- Kalange, P. R., & Jain, R. (2018). A Survey on Energy Efficiency & Environmental Sustainability in Green Cloud Computing.
- Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020). Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1479-1493.
- Knieke, C., Lawrenz, S., Fröhling, M., Goldmann, D., & Rausch, A. (2019). Predictive and flexible Circular Economy approaches for highly integrated products and their materials as given in E-Mobility and ICT. Materials Science Forum, 959, 22-31.
- Kulczycka, J., & Smol, M. (2016). Environmentally friendly pathways for the evaluation of investment projects using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost analysis (LCCA). Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(3), 829-842.
- Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36-51.
- Markusson, N. (2010). The championing of environmental improvements in technology investment projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 777-783.
- Matt Thorne. (2021). The carbon footprint of your phone – and how you can reduce it Feb 26, 2021.
- Mattila, T., Judl, J., & Seppälä, J. (2014). Carbon footprint of mobile devices: open questions in carbon footprinting of emerging mobile ICT technologies. Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, 1.
- Mossali, E., Picone, N., Gentilini, L., Rodrìguez, O., Pérez, J. M., & Colledani, M. (2020). Lithium-ion batteries towards circular economy: A literature review of opportunities and issues of recycling treatments. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110500.
- Rawat, S., Kumar, P., Sagar, S., Singh, I., & Garg, K. (2017, December). An analytical evaluation of challenges in Green cloud computing. In 2017 International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (Trends and Future Directions) (ICTUS) (pp. 351-355). IEEE.
- S&P Global. (n.d.). Index Carbon Metrics Explained.
- Sandberg, E., & Hultberg, E. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for the scaling of circular business model initiatives in the fashion industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128831.
- Shvetsova, O. A., & Lee, J. H. (2020). Minimizing the environmental impact of industrial production: Evidence from south Korean waste treatment investment projects. Applied Sciences, 10(10), 3489.
- UN Comtrade Database. (n.d.). Repository of official international trade statistics and relevant analytical tables.
- UNCTAD. (2021). World Investment Report 2021. Investing in sustainable recovery.
- Velázquez-Martínez, O., Valio, J., Santasalo-Aarnio, A., Reuter, M., & Serna-Guerrero, R. (2019). A critical review of lithium-ion battery recycling processes from a circular economy perspective. Batteries, 5(4), 68.
- Whalen, K. A., Milios, L., & Nussholz, J. (2018). Bridging the gap: Barriers and potential for scaling reuse practices in the Swedish ICT sector. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 123-131.