Enhancing administrative service delivery practices of local government: Experiences from Nepal
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(1).2024.12
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2024, Issue #1, pp. 150-161
- 256 Views
-
70 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to examine the administrative service delivery practices within the local government of Nepal and explore the intricate perceptions of the interplay between governance, service delivery, and citizens. The objectives include understanding the contextual elements that shape states, addressing concerns of developing nations, emphasizing service delivery, prioritizing citizen viewpoints, and tackling governance issues. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach grounded on post-positivism, the study employs purposeful sampling to select rural municipalities in Nepal. Data collection involves a quantitative institutional survey to assess the current state of public administrative services, with survey respondents comprising service providers and citizens. The respondents reported higher levels of satisfaction with the efficiency, timeliness, and resource availability of administrative services. However, the study also revealed gaps and disparities in the knowledge and perceptions of administrative practices and governance among different respondent groups and ecological regions. Emphasizing the significant advantages of collaboration, decentralization, people-centric development, and meaningful engagement, the study highlights the need for further research and policy interventions to enhance public service delivery and governance of local government in Nepal.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O17, H72, H75
-
References39
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sampling and population of the study
- Table 2. Sample size determination
- Table 3. Distribution of respondents by socio-economic characteristics
- Table 4. Proportion of responses on administrative system evaluation
- Table 5. Efficiency of administrative service delivery by place of residence
- Table 6. Indicators of good governance by place of residence
-
- Angkasah, L., Adolf, H., Wibowo, G. D. H., & Asikin, Z. (2017). Bureaucratic reform in the perspective of state administration law. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(5S1), 35-41.
- Bello, M. F., & Mackson, A. M. (2022). Competent and qualified personnel and service delivery at the local government level in Nigeria: A conceptual review. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 7(2), 25-36.
- Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). (2011). National Population and Housing Censur 2011. National Planning Commission Secretariat, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.
- Chisanga, A., Daka, S., Simbeye, T. S., Kachinda, W., Chirwa, E., & Chisanga, E. (2023). Examining the impact of equalization funds on service delivery by local authorities: A case study of Chongwe district council in Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(10), 878-897.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Egbon, T. N. (2023). Application of agency theory in administrative accountability and public service delivery in local government councils in Delta State. International Journal of Public Administration Studies, 3(2), 125-129.
- Ekpo, H. A. (2008). Decentralization and service delivery: A framework. Nairobi, Kenya: African Economic Research Consortium (AERC).
- Hutahaean, M., & Pasaribu, J. (2021). Bureaucratic reform and changes in public service paradigm post-decentralization in Indonesia: 2001–2010. Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration (pp. 795-810). Surakarta, Indonesia.
- International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). (2016). Global food policy report. Washington, DC.
- Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2018). Ranking countries for good governance using public opinion surveys. In D. Malito, G. Umbach, & N. Bhuta (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Indicators in Global Governance (pp. 407-429). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Jumanne, A. S., Njoroge, J., & Moi, E. J. (2023). Effect of legal factors on strategic leadership practices and devolved administrative structures in selected Semi-Arid counties in Kenya. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 8(3), 58-85.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
- Kyle, J., & Resnick, D. (2016). Nepal’s 2072 federal constitution: Implications for the governance of agriculture sector (IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 01589). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Lerio, R. R., & Bandiola, A. N. (2023). Work environment, human resource practices, and organizational culture: A causal model on service quality of employees in government agency in Davao Region. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 8(3), 1-33.
- Loughlin, J. (Ed.) (2004). Subnational democracy in the European Union: Challenges and opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mngomezulu, S. (2020). Political interference in the administration of service delivery in Umlalazi local municipality of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 12(1), 38-45.
- Ndema, S. C. (2022). New public management approach to public service delivery in Nigeria: A study of Enugu State Public Service. International Journal of Business Systems and Economics, 13(7), 1-21.
- Nepal Administrative Staff College (NASC). (2018). Nepal National Governance Survey 2017/18 (NNGS 2017/18). Jawalakhel, Lalitpur.
- Nepal Law Commission. (2015). Constitution of Nepal 2015. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.
- Ngumbela, X. G. (2022). The relationship between policy, governance and service delivery in local government in South Africa. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2(34), 1-12.
- Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
- Oluwaleye, J. M. (2023). State interference and service delivery in Nigeria’s local government administration: The case of Ado Local Government Area, Ekiti State, 2011–2021. Global Journal of Political Science and Administration, 11(2), 28-41.
- Otutu, N., Otikal, K., Adyanga, F. A., & Ocan, J. (2023). Boosting service delivery through strengthened local government assessments: Insights from Uganda’s LGMSD Framework. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 6(2), 164-180.
- Pradhan, R., & Shrestha, A. (2005). Ethnic and caste diversity: Implications for development (Working Paper Series No. 4). Nepal: Asian Development Bank.
- Sadat, A., & Andika, R. (2022). Bureaucracy capacity of local governments for the implementation of public services: A literature study. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(1), 19-26.
- Saito, F. (2011). Decentralization. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Governance. SAGE Publications.
- Shah, A. (2006). Corruption and decentralization public governance (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3824).
- Shah, A., & Shah, S. (2006). The new vision of local governance and the evolving roles of local governments. In A. Shah (Ed.), Local Governance in Developing Countries. World Bank.
- Sharma, B. (2017, November 8). Rich man’s election. My Republica.
- Soublière, J. F., & Cloutier, C. (2015). Explaining levels of local government involvement in service delivery: The dynamics of cross-sector partnerships in Malawi. Public Administration and Development, 35(3), 192-205.
- Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. Journal of International Social Science, 50(155), 17-28.
- Subedi, B. P. (2016). Using Likert type data in social science research: Confusion, issues and challenges. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences, 3(2), 36-49.
- Treisman, D. (2007). The architecture of government: Rethinking political decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- UNDP. (2000). The UNDP role in decentralization and local governance. New York: UNDP.
- Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical reorientation of bureaucratic reform and good governance in public sector administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308-316.
- World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
- World Bank. (1998). Public expenditure management handbook. Washington DC: The World Bank.
- World Bank. (2004). World Bank development report: Making services work for poor people. Washington, D.C.
- World Bank. (2014). Local service delivery in Nepal. World Bank South Asia Governance and Public Sector (SASGP) South Asia Region.