Effectiveness of the fraud triangle model in the detection of financial statement fraud in South African municipalities
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(1).2025.08
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #1, pp. 95-105
- 59 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
There is a high prevalence of financial statement fraud and wasteful expenditure in South African municipalities. According to the fraud triangle model, pressure, opportunity, and rationalization are the underlying causes of financial statement fraud. The study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the fraud triangle model in detecting financial statement fraud in South African municipalities. The study developed variables serving proxy measures for pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. The variables were analyzed and tested using the logistics regression model and publicly available financial data for the 257 municipalities in South Africa over six years, from 2015/16 to 2020/21. The results showed a high correlation between fraud in financial statements and four fraud risk markers. High capital expenditure, high accrual amounts, poor liquidity ratios, and high leverage ratios are the risk elements. The results contribute fresh perspectives to the corpus of information already available on financial statement fraud in South Africa. To ascertain the effectiveness of the fraud triangle model in identifying and preventing financial statement fraud, future studies should incorporate different range of variables, techniques, and sample sizes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H83, M42
-
References32
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Provincial distribution of audit outcomes
-
- Table 1. Fraud triangle model coding
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics for dependent and independent variables
- Table 3. Aggregate mean values of fraud risk proxies (2016–2021)
- Table 4. Disaggregated mean values of fraud risk proxies by province
- Table 5. Pairwise correlation matrix for fraud risk factors (2015–2021)
- Table 6. Logistic regression results for estimating the fraud triangle model
-
- Aghghaleh, S. F., & Zakiah, M. M. (2014). Fraud risk factors of fraud triangle and the likelihood of fraud occurrence: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 6(1), 1-7.
- Ahmad, Z., Norhashim, M., Song, O. T., & Hui, L. T. (2016). A typology of employees’ information security behaviour. 2016 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) (pp. 1-4). Bandung, Indonesia.
- Amara, I., Ben Amar, A., & Jarboui, A. (2013). Detection of fraud in financial statements: French companies as a case study. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(3), 40-51.
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Report to the Nations. 2020 global study on occupational fraud and abuse.
- Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA). (2022). MFMA 2020–21. Consolidated general report on local government audit outcomes.
- Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Financial statement fraud: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441-454.
- Courtois, C., & Gendron, Y. (2020). Research: Why corporate fraud reports are down. Harvard Business Review.
- Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738-743.
- Feruleva, N. V., & Shtefan, M. A. (2017). Detecting financial statements fraud: The evidence from Russia. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, 11(2), 32-45.
- Fitri, F. A., Syukur, M., & Justisa, G. (2019). Do the fraud triangle components motivate fraud in Indonesia? Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 13(4), 63-72.
- Ghazali, M. Z., Rahim, M. S., Ali, A., & Abidin, Sh. (2014). A preliminary study on fraud prevention and detection at the state and local government entities in Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 437-444.
- Higson, A., & Kassem, R. (2013). Implications of the fraud triangle for external auditors. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. Paris, France: European Accounting Association.
- IAASB. (2009). International Standard on Auditing (ISA 240).The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements.
- Kassem, R. (2014). Detecting asset misappropriation: A framework for external auditors. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 10(1), 1740-8008.
- Kelly, G. (2016). The role of corporate governance. In A. Doig (Ed.), Fraud (pp. 391-403). Routledge.
- Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Data mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 995-1003.
- Laubscher, L. H. (2012). Challenges on financial control and accountability in South African municipalities. New Generation Sciences, 10(1), 63-79.
- Lou, Y.-I., & Wang, M.-L. (2009). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle. Assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 7(2), 61-78.
- Maria, E., & Gudono. (2017). Empirical test of fraud triangle theory on local government (Evidence from Indonesia). Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(4), 233-248.
- Mehanna, S., & Soliman, M. M. (2021). Can fraud triangle model predict fraudulent financial statements? Evidence from Egypt. Scientific Journal of Commercial and Environmental Studies, 12(4), 72-124.
- Mohd-Sanusi, Z., Khalid, N. H., & Mahir, A. (2015). An evaluation of clients’ fraud reasoning motives in assessing fraud risks: From the perspective of external and internal auditors. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 2-12.
- Mongwe, W. T., & Malan, K. M. (2020). A survey of automated financial statement fraud detection with relevance to the South African context. South African Computer Journal, 32(1), 74-111.
- Nahartyo, E., Rohma, F. F., & Mursita, L. Y. (2020). The mediating effect of overcompensation of rationalisation on instrumental climate and escalation of corruption relationship. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 25(2).
- Nakashima, M. (2017). Can the fraud triangle predict accounting fraud?: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 13(1), 198-232.
- Özcan, A. (2016). Firm characteristics and accounting fraud: A multivariate approach. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(2), 128-144.
- Rabiu, A., Noorhayati, M., & Muhammad, S. N. (2017). Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory: Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(28), 30-37.
- Roebuck, S. (2016). Examining motivational factors that influence the likelihood of fraud (Thesis). East Carolina University.
- Sabatian, Z., & Hutabarat, F. M. (2020). The effect of fraud triangle in detecting financial statement fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(3), 231-244.
- Spathis, C. T. (2002). Detecting false financial statements using published data: Some evidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(4), 179-191.
- Suyanto, S. (2009). Fraudulent financial statement: Evidence from statement on auditing standard No. 99. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 11(1), 117-144.
- Tunley, M., Button, M., Shepherd, D., & Blackbourn, D. (2018). Preventing occupational corruption: Utilising situational crime prevention techniques and theory to enhance organisational resilience. Security Journal, 31(1), 21-52.
- Wadhwa, V. K., Saini, A. K., & Kumar, S. S. (2020). Financial fraud prediction models: A review of research evidence. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 677-680.