Effect of digital opportunity recognition on students’ digital entrepreneurial intentions and behavior
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.53
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 673-686
- 255 Views
-
58 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to examine the effect of digital opportunity recognition on students’ intentions and behavior related to digital entrepreneurship. The study measures the influence of digital opportunity recognition on antecedents of the theory of planned behavior and indirect influence on digital entrepreneurial intentions and behavior. This study employed a cross-sectional design. Data were collected from 2,840 students enrolled in professional management and entrepreneurship directions at universities in Saudi Arabia. The target sample consisted of individuals who have plans to become entrepreneurs. The findings indicated that digital opportunity recognition has a direct and significant effect on attitude, subjective norms, perceived self-efficacy, and an indirect effect on intentions and behavior toward digital entrepreneurship. Furthermore, this study checked multigroup differences between male and female samples: males show more favorable behavior toward digital entrepreneurship compared to females in Saudi Arabia. Collectively, the antecedents of the theory of planned behavior and digital opportunity recognition explained 65.1% of the variance in digital entrepreneurial behavior, with males at 68.2% and females at 63.2%. The research implication is that policymakers should prioritize integrating digital entrepreneurship into education curricula and providing support mechanisms to nurture the potential of digital-native students.
Acknowledgments
The author extends his appreciation to the Arab Open University for funding this work through Research Fund No. (AOUKSA-524008).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M13, L26, M20
-
References61
-
Tables7
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Structural equation model for the full sample (n = 2,840)
- Figure 3. Structural equation model for the male sample (n = 1,134)
- Figure 4. Structural equation model for the female sample (n = 1,706)
-
- Table 1. Measurement model
- Table 2. Discriminant validity
- Table 3. Path coefficients (Direct effects)
- Table 4. Indirect effects (male sample, n = 1,134)
- Table 5. Indirect effects (female sample, n = 1,706)
- Table 6. Coefficient of determination
- Table 7. Multigroup analysis (MGA)
-
- Abbasianchavari, A., & Moritz, A. (2021). The impact of role models on entrepreneurial intentions and behavior: A review of the literature. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 1-40.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
- Alateeg, S. S., & Alhammadi, A. D. (2023). Traditional retailer’s intention to opt e-commerce for digital retail business in Saudi Arabia. Migration Letters, 20(7), 1307-1326.
- Alateeg, S., & Alhammadi, A. (2024). The impact of organizational culture on organizational innovation with the mediation role of strategic leadership in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 13(2), 843-858.
- Alateeg, S., Alhammadi, A., Al-Ayed, S. I., & Helmi, M. A. (2024). Factors Influencing on Behavioral Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence for Startup Sustainability. Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 2924-2941.
- Al-Ayed, S. I. (2024). Drivers of e-business adoption in SMEs in Saudi Arabia. Migration Letters, 21(3), 30-42.
- Al-Ayed, S. I., Al-Tit, A. A., & Alashjaee, A. (2023). The effect of digital transformation on organizational performance by a mediating role of digital innovation. Migration Letters, 20(7), 380-394.
- Al-Ayed, S., & Al-Tit, A. (2024). The impact of digitized customer behaviors on performance: The mediating and the moderating role of digitized CRM. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 189-194.
- Alferaih, A. (2017). Weight-and meta-analysis of empirical literature on entrepreneurship: Towards a conceptualization of entrepreneurial intention and behaviour. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(3), 195-209.
- Alkhalaileh, M. Y. (2021). Systematic review: Digital entrepreneurship intention. Network Intelligence Studies, 9(17), 25-34.
- Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Alshallaqi, M. (2022). Impact of autonomy, innovativeness, risk-taking, proactiveness, and competitive aggressiveness on students’ intention to start a new venture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), Article 100239.
- Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
- Avkiran, N. K., & Ringle, C. M. (Eds.). (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Recent advances in banking and finance. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
- Badaruddin, M. N., & Abdullah, N. (2018). Study on intention mediating role in cyber enterpreneurship adoption among the undergraduates in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, 3(4), 8-15.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
- Baron, R. A. (2004). Opportunity recognition: A cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2004(1).
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Davidson, E., & Vaast, E. (2010). Digital entrepreneurship and its sociomaterial enactment. 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Honolulu, HI, USA.
- Dy, A. M. (2022). Levelling the playing field? Towards a critical-social perspective on digital entrepreneurship. Futures, 135, Article 102438.
- European Commission. (2012). Effects and Impact of Entrepreneurship Programmes in Higher Education. Brussels.
- Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35-43.
- Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95-111.
- Gielnik, M. M., Barabas, S., Frese, M., Namatovu-Dawa, R., Scholz, F. A., Metzger, J. R., & Walter, T. (2014). A temporal analysis of how entrepreneurial goal intentions, positive fantasies, and action planning affect starting a new venture and when the effects wear off. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(6), 755-772.
- Gieure, C., Benavides-Espinosa, M. del M., & Roig-Dobón, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial intentions in an international university environment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(8), 1605-1620.
- Gieure, C., Benavides-Espinosa, M. del M., & Roig-Dobón, S. (2020). The entrepreneurial process: The link between intentions and behavior. Journal of Business Research, 112, 541-548.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hejazinia, R. (2015). The impact of IT-based entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2(3), 243-253.
- Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 82-109.
- Heuer, A., & Liñán, F. (2013). Testing alternative measures of subjective norms in entrepreneurial intention models. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(1), 35-50.
- Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81-99.
- Hoyle, R. H. (1999). Statistical strategies for small sample research (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
- Hull, C. E. K., Hung, Y. T. C., Hair, N., Perotti, V., & DeMartino, R. (2007). Taking advantage of digital opportunities: A typology of digital entrepreneurship. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 4(3), 290-303.
- Hult, G. T. M., Hair Jr, J. F., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1-21.
- Iakovleva, T., Kolvereid, L., & Stephan, U. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions in developing and developed countries. Education+Training, 53(5), 353-370.
- Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity and profit: Studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60-85.
- Kraus, S., Palme, C., Kailer, N., & Kallinger, F. L., & Spitzer, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2), 353-375.
- Lee, S. M., Lim, S. B., & Pathak, R. D. (2011). Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi-country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 1-15.
- Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
- Liñán, F., Nabi, G., & Krueger, N. (2020). La intención emprendedora en Reino Unido y España: Un estudio comparative [British and Spanish entrepreneurial intentions: A comparative study]. Revista de Economía Mundial, 33, 73-103.
- Mir, A. A., Hassan, S., & Khan, S. J. (2023). Understanding digital entrepreneurial intentions: A capital theory perspective. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(2), 6165-6191.
- Morton, S., Mergler, A., & Boman, P. (2014). Managing the transition: The role of optimism and self-efficacy for first-year Australian university students. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 24(1), 90-108.
- Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), Article 103773.
- Nasar, A., & Akram, M. (2022). COVID-19 crisis and parameters for sustainable entrepreneurship. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 18(3), 321-329.
- Nasar, A., Kamarudin, S., Rizal, A. M., Ngoc, V. T. B., & Shoaib, S. M. (2019). Short-term and long-term entrepreneurial intention comparison between Pakistan and Vietnam. Sustainability, 11(23), Article 6529.
- Ngoasong, M. Z. (2018). Digital entrepreneurship in a resource-scarce context: A focus on entrepreneurial digital competencies. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(3), 483-500.
- Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 174-192.
- Sarasvathy, D. K., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33(2), 207-225.
- Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291-332.
- Shah, N., & Soomro, B. A. (2017). Investigating entrepreneurial intention among public sector university students of Pakistan. Education + Training, 59(7/8), 841-855.
- Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Sharahiley, S. M. (2020). Examining entrepreneurial intention of the Saudi Arabia’s university students: Analyzing alternative integrated research model of TPB and EEM. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(1), 67-84.
- Sobaih, A. E. E., & Elshaer, I. A. (2022). Personal traits and digital entrepreneurship: A mediation model using SmartPLS data analysis. Mathematics, 10(21), 3926.
- Siu, W. S., & Lo, E. S. C. (2013). Cultural contingency in the cognitive model of entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 147-173.
- Tajvidi, R., & Tajvidi, M. (2021). The growth of cyber entrepreneurship in the food industry: Virtual community engagement in the COVID-19 era. British Food Journal, 123(10), 3309-3325.
- Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Islam, A. N., & Mäntymäki, M. (2020). Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. Computers in Industry, 122, Article 103290.
- Thompson, E. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669-694.
- Wang, Y. S., Lin, S. J., Yeh, C. H., Li, C. R., & Li, H. T. (2016). What drives students’ cyber entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of disciplinary difference. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 22-35.
- Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organization management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
- Younis, H., Katsioloudes, M., & Al Bakri, A. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship intentions of Qatar university students motivational factors identification: Digital entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), 10(1), 56-74.