Does Employee Stock Ownership Plan matter? An empirical note
-
Author(s)Fitri IsmiyantiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2353-0149
,
Putu Anom MahadwarthaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-5478
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3-2).2017.08
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2017, Issue #3, pp. 381-388
- Cited by
- 1490 Views
-
291 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) is a company program to provide incentives to managers to increase shareholder wealth and to align interests between the shareholders and the management. This ESOP is one of the most effective efforts to reduce conflicts of interest between the owners and the managers. ESOP program is basically intended to provide motivation and incentives for employees, so that employees will have a sense of concern (sense of belonging) to the company. Productivity is a reflection of the level of efficiency and effectiveness of work in total in a company. Productivity becomes very important, because it can describe the performance of a company. Performance is defined as the size or level at which individuals and organizations can achieve goals effectively and efficiently. This study aims to examine the effect of ESOP variables on company performance by using productivity as a mediating variable in non-financial companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample used in this research is companies that implement ESOP in the period 2000–2015. In this study, the company’s performance is measured by using return on assets, return on equity and Tobin’s Q, while productivity is measured by using sales per employee, cash flow per employee, and total assets turnover. Based on the results, it can be concluded that Employee Stock Ownership Program (ESOP) has a positive and significant impact on productivity.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G11, M12
-
References18
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistic
- Table 2. Inner weights result
-
- Beatty, A. (1995). The cash flow and informational effects of employee stock plans. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 211-240.
- Blasi, Joseph, Michael Conte, & Douglas, Kruse. (1996). Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50(1), 60-79.
- Bonin, J. P., Jones, D. C., & Putterman, L. (1993). Theoretical and empirical studies of producer cooperatives: Will ever the twain meet? Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1290-1320.
- Conte, M., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1978). Employee-owned companies: is the difference measurable? Monthly Labor Review, 97-102.
- Conte, M., Svejnar, J. (1990). The performance effects of employee ownership plans. In A. S. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence (pp. 143-172). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
- Conway, Margaret. (2000). Political participation in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
- Craig, B., & Pencavel, J. (1992). The behavior of worker cooperatives: the plywood companies of the pacific northwest. American Economic Review, 82, 1083-1105.
- Freiman, H. A. (1989). Understanding Leveraged ESOP Economics (Fidelity Management Trust Company), June.
- French, J. L., & Rosenstein, J. (1984). Employee ownership, work attitudes, and power relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 861-869.
- Gamble, John E. (2000). Management commitment to innovation and ESOP stock concentration. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 433.
- Gordon, L. A., & Pound, J. (1990). ESOPs and corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 525-555.
- Hallock, D. E., Salazar, R. J., & Venneman, S. (2004). Demographic and attitudinal correlates of employee satisfaction with an ESOP. British Journal of Management, 15(4), 321-333.
- Jensen, M. C. (1986). The Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow: Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2) (May).
- Lambert, Richard, A., & David F. Larcker. (1987). An Analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), 85-125.
- Patard, Richard, J. (1985). Employee Stock Ownership in the 1970s. In Employee Ownership – A Reader (p. 58). National Center for Employee Ownership.
- Saul, E., & Derek, C. J. (1992). The viability of employee- owned firms: evidence from France. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 45(2), 323-338.
- Shearman, & Sterling. (1989). ESOPs: What They Are and How They Work.
- William, N. P., Sharon, L., Oswald, J., S., Jahera, Jr. (2000). The effect of ESOP adoptions on corporate performance: are there really performance changes? Managerial Decision Economics, 21(5), 167- 180.
-
Industrial development in Saudi Arabia: disparity in growth and development
Anis Ali
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 23-35 Views: 3089 Downloads: 1043 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIndustrial development in any nation plays a vital role in the strengthening of the economy and employs human resources as per specifications and directly towards the mainstream of the nation. In Saudi Arabia, there was rapid industrialization for four decades. Some manufacturing industries performed well, while some internal and external business environment factors influenced the others’ performance. The study focuses on historical development, as well as recent trends of well-performing and poor-performing industries of Saudi Arabia. Small manufacturing industries in Saudi Arabia are underdeveloped and need more attention to attain sustainable and progressive growth rate in the form of the number of establishments to enjoy the potential. Manufacture of tobacco, computer, electronics and optics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment are the deprived and underdeveloped industries of the manufacturing sector. There should be some easy credit schemes for the development of deprived or underdeveloped manufacturing industries. To attain sustainable growth and development of the manufacturing sector, a positive attitude of the government towards underdeveloped manufacturing industries, favorable labor laws, and entrepreneurial awareness, technical and financial assistance are necessary. The growth and development of the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia will be helpful in the attainment of goals of Vision 2030.
-
Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?
Sarwar Uddin Ahmed ,
Samiul Parvez Ahmed ,
Ikramul Hasan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 71-80 Views: 2863 Downloads: 1146 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWhy banks should be concerned about incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in the lending process? What is the motivation? This study aims to find the motives for considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in bank lending process. A primary survey has been conducted to know the current status and motivation for incorporating ESG factors in investment decisions. Sample comprised 30 private commercial banks (PCBs) operating in Bangladesh. Data collected were analyzed with graphs, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Findings of the study indicate that banks are mostly considering basic environmental, social and governance factors set by regulators qualitatively. They are lagging behind in considering the advanced ESG criteria needed for sustainable and efficient credit risk management. Based on motivation for incorporating ESG factors, it was found that banks pioneering in incorporating ESG factors in lending decisions are compensated through better financial performance. Findings of the study are expected to encourage practitioners and policy-makers to take more pragmatic steps to incorporate ESG risk factors quantitatively in lending decision-making process.
-
Business dynamism in the world economy
Zuzana Virglerova ,
Felice Addeo ,
Eliska Zapletalikova
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.14
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 160-169 Views: 2847 Downloads: 324 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe creation and growth of new enterprises and, on the other hand, their decline and market exit are crucial factors of business dynamism and economic growth. Thus, business dynamism is an important aspect in the market chain and productivity of an economy, as well as a trigger for market reforms. The aim is to analyze business dynamism using Global Competitiveness Index 4.0 and its variables worldwide and to verify the relationship between business dynamism in the EU states and economic characteristics such as Valued added at factor cost, Enterprise Birth Rate and Enterprise Death Rate. Data were collected from the 2019 Global Competitiveness Report and from the EUROSTAT database, using the most recently updated source for each indicator. The 11th pillar of the Global Competitiveness Index, focused on business dynamics, and a set of indicators were analyzed using PCA to verify if all the variables are effective representatives of the concept. It was found out that the pillar does not effectively represent the concept of business dynamism in case of the EU countries; therefore the new pillar was constructed. A strong and statistically significant correlation between business dynamism and Value Added was confirmed. A relationship between business dynamism and other economic indicators was not proven. From a territorial point of view, Oceania achieved the best overall result in the analyzed field. The process of starting a new business is the most challenging in terms of start-up costs in South America. By contrast, the EU has reached the best result in this process.
