Designing an organizational engagement model using structural equation modeling: case study of National Iranian Oil Company
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.01
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #3, pp. 1-13
- 954 Views
-
519 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Today’s organizations need energetic and engaged employees, those who are interested in their jobs. Generally, the engaged ones love their job and do their job tasks well. If there is no engagement in the organizations, the organization is encountered with serious problems in this ground. This study aims to design engagement assessment model in the organizations and its applied purpose is creating new theoretical basics in the maturity of engagement in the organization and this helps the organizations for better perception and consistency of organizational goals with the goals of employees. The employees of the National Iranian Oil Company constituted the population for this research. The National Iranian Oil Company was selected as the context, because employee engagement has emerged as a critical problem confronting this sector. 356 employees of this company were selected by simple random sampling method and data were collected using a questionnaire. The researcher attempts to answer the question how we can design an engagement assessment model in the organizations. The different dimensions of engagement are identified at individual and organizational levels and then based on the findings, the employees are classified based on the individual and organizational engagement and the results of this study can help the researchers for better recognition of this internal variable and this helps the better understanding of researchers to use it.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M54
-
References26
-
Tables1
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. The engagement model
- Figure 2. The components of work engagement concept
- Figure 3. The effective factors of employees’ engagement
-
- Table 1. The path coefficients and explained variance
-
- Abolalayi, B. (2012). How can we have motivated employees who love work and organization? Tehran. Industrial management organization publications.
- Burke, J., & El-Kot, G. (2010). Work engagement Among Managers and Professionals in Egypt: Potential antecedents and consequences. African Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 1(1), 42-60.
- Chughtai, A., & Buckley, F. (2011). Work engagement antecedent, the mediating role of learning goal orientation and job performance. Career development International, 16(7), 684-705.
- Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241-259.
- Glantz, J. C. H. (2010). Employee Engagement Surveys: From Request for Proposal to Return on Investment (A dissertation submitted in partial).
- Gozukara, I., Faruk Simsek, O. (2015). Linking Transformational Leadership to Work Engagement and the Mediator Effect of Job Autonomy: A Study in a Turkish Private Non-Profit University. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 963-971.
- Hewitt, A. (2004). Research Brief: employee engagement higher at double digit growth companies.
- Hewitt, A. (2011a). Trends in global employee engagement.
- Hewitt, A. (2015). Model of Employee Engagement. January Proprietary and Confidential.
- Hulkko, K., Sart, D., Hakonen, A., & Sweins, C. (2012). Total rewards perception and work engagement in elder-care organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
- Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. Oxford, England: Wiley.
- Kaveh, M., & Ganji, F. (2014). The evaluation of the relationship between organizational commitment and engagement among the employees of Jihad Keshavarzi organization and education department of Shahre Kord (The second national conference of psychology and behavioral science).
- Kompaso, S. M. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 89-96.
- Kula, R., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., & Truss, K. (2008). Employee engagement: a literature review Kingston Business School, Kingston University.
- Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-20.
- Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
- Naderi, F., & Safarzade, S. (2014). The relationship between organizational justice, organizational health, work engagement and innovative organizational climate with the psychological empowerment and civil organizational behavior. Knowledge and research in the applied psychology, 3, 56-68.
- Noami, A., & Shenavar, F. (2015). The role of work engagement, job control, innovative behaviors and transformational leadership in the prediction of job changes. The researches of public management, 27, 145-165.
- Salanova, M., Agut, D., & Peiro, J. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyality: the mediation ofservice climate. Journal of applied psychology, 90(60), 1217-1227.
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job recourse and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organization Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
- Schaufeli, W., Marfitnez, J., Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university student. Journal of Cross – Culture Psychology, 23, 464-481.
- Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
- Schaufeli, W., Taris, T., LeBlanc, P., Peeters, M., & Bakker, A. (2001). Can work produce health? The quest for the engaged worker. De Psycholoog, 36, 422-428.
- Trépaniera, G. S., Fernet, C., Austinb, S., & Ménard, J. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between burnout and work engagement: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) approach. Burnout Research, 2(2-3), 51-59.
- Zinger, D. (2010, November). The Improved and Simplified Zinger Model of Employee Engagement.
- Zinger, D. (2014, March). 5 Lessons in Organizational Engagement from Honeybees.