Corruption and stock market development in EAP countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.21
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #2, pp. 266-276
- Cited by
- 1052 Views
-
144 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Using macroeconomic factors as control variables, this paper examines the impact of corruption on the development of the stock market in East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) from 2008 to 2018. The research model uses GMM techniques to estimate panel data on two sub-sets of data, including five developed markets and seven emerging markets, and a dataset of both market groups. The market capitalization and the stock transaction value relative to GDP represent the development of the stock market, and the corruption control index represents the corruption factor. The empirical results found that corruption has a positive impact on the EAP stock market capitalization with the entire sample data set, which positively affects both size of the market capitalization value and value of stock transactions in underdeveloped markets. However, it is not statistically significant in explaining the development of developed stock markets. Besides, macroeconomic factors such as inflation, interest rates, savings, and credit affect some stock markets at EAP. Compared to previous studies, the article’s results found that corruption affects stock market capitalization and has a positive impact on stock liquidity in underdeveloped stock markets. Corruption affects more underdeveloped stock markets than developed stock markets. This may be due to the implicit relationship of economic benefits between large enterprises and officials in underdeveloped markets.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G18
-
References22
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Stock market capitalization at the end of 2008 and 2018 (USD billion)
-
- Table 1. Corruption control and stock market development at EAP (2008–2018)
- Table 2. Corruption affecting the development of the EAP stock market
-
- Ahn, S. C., & Schmidt, P. (1995). Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 5-27.
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
- Aulby, H., & Campbell, R. (2018). The cost of corruption: The growing perception of corruption and its cost to GDP (Discussion paper). The Australia Institute.
- Cieślik, A., & Goczek, Ł. (2018). Control of corruption, international investment, and economic growth-Evidence from panel data. World Development, 103, 323-335.
- De Rosa, D., Gooroochurn, N., & Gorg, H. (2010). Corruption and productivity: firm-level evidence from the BEEPS survey (Working Paper, The World Bank, No. 5348).
- FTSE-Russell. (2018). FTSE Annual Country Classification Review.
- Gani, A., & Ngassam, C. (2008). Effect of institutional factors on stock market development in Asia. American Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(2), 103-120.
- Garcia, V. F., & Liu, L. (1999). Macroeconomic determinants of stock market development. Journal of Applied Economics, 2(1), 29-59.
- Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(4), 1029-1054.
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246.
- Lau, C. K. M., Demir, E., & Bilgin, M. H. (2013). Experience-based corporate corruption and stock market volatility: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 17, 1-13.
- Mashal, A. M. (2011). Corruption and resource allocation distortion for “ESCWA” countries. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1(4), 71-83.
- Mouselli, S., Aljazaerli, M. A., & Sirop, R. (2016). Corruption and stock market development: New evidence from GCC countries. Business: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 117-127.
- Ng, D. (2006). The impact of corruption on financial markets. Managerial Finance, 32(10), 822-836.
- Pei, M. (2008). Fighting corruption: A difficult challenge for Chinese leaders. In C. Li (Ed.), China’s changing political landscape: Prospects for democracy (pp. 229-250). New York: Brookings Institution Press.
- Pellegrini, C. B., Sergi, B. S., & Sironi, E. (2017). Stock Returns, Productivity, and Corruption in Eight European Fast-Emerging Markets. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(1), 15-22.
- Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. (Eds.) (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wang, Y., & You, J. (2012). Corruption and firm growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(2), 415-433.
- Warf, B. (2019). Global Corruption from a Geographic Perspective. Springer International Publishing.
- Wedeman, A. (2003). Development and corruption: The East Asian paradox. In Political Business in East Asia (pp. 50-77). Routledge.
- Yartey, C. A. (2010). The institutional and macroeconomic determinants of stock market development in emerging economies. Applied Financial Economics, 20(21), 1615-1625.
- Zhou, J. Q., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Does bribery help or hurt firm growth around the world? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 907-921.