Corporate social responsibility as a strategic aspect of achieving financial stability of a business
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/dm.18(4).2020.03
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 19-29
- 470 Views
-
216 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In a modern turbulent economic environment, strengthening the principle of quasi-stability, globalization and competition, corporate social responsibility is becoming a driving force in establishing market proportions and business development prospects. This substantiates the importance of developing corporate social behavior as a strategic aspect of achieving financial stability in the practice of market participants. The study is aimed at developing a theoretical and methodological justification of the role of corporate social responsibility in optimizing the company’s costs and its impact on basic financial indicators, as well as identifying the relationship between the costs of corporate social behavior and the increase in company value. The research object is corporate social responsibility as one of the tools to achieve business financial performance. The theoretical basis was the analysis of works and publications of leading scientists, research data on CSR practices of successful Ukrainian and international companies, determination of the relationship between the current decline in company profits due to socially oriented costs and sustainable business development. The results obtained made it possible to demonstrate the CSR model of a financially stable company and to characterize the advantages and sources of reducing the company’s costs due to the effective CSR implementation by Ukrainian companies. The practical value of the results can be important not only for the company’s management system, but also for stakeholders such as consultants, shareholders, scientists, authorities, since the results show a positive relationship between CSR and financial performance, and stakeholders can exert some pressure on companies that do not have a CSR policy and thus encourage them to change.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L10, L19, L20, M14, Q01
-
References18
-
Tables2
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Етапи процесу розробки КСВ-стратегії компанії за внутрішнім та зовнішнім векторами
- Figure 2. Модель КСВ фінансово стійкої компанії
- Figure 3. Характеристика політики уряду України щодо СВ бізнесу за 2017–2019 рр.
-
- Table 1. Класифікація витрат компанії на КСВ
- Table 2. Ранжування потенційних заходів, результатів та економії витрат завдяки впровадженню практик КСВ для основних груп стейкхолдерів
-
- Beliavska, K. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: evoliutsiia pohliadiv na problemu [Social responsibility of business: evolution of views on the problem]. Herald of Khmelnytskyi national university. Economic sciences, 1, 228–233. (In Ukrainian).
- Bowman, E., & Haire, M. (1975). A Strategic Posture Towrd Corporate Social Responsibility. California Management Review, 18(2), 54–59.
- Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.
- Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibility. California Management Review, 2, 70–76.
- Dziuba, O., & Ziuzina, W. (2012). Internal component of enterprise corporate social responsibility. Journal of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series of Economics and Management Issues, 725, 277–281. (In Ukrainian).
- Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, 122–126.
- Hillman, A., & Keim, G. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.
- Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 53–80.
- Novikova, O., Deich, M., & Pankova O. (2013). Diahnostyka stanu ta perspektyv rozvytku sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti v Ukraini (ekspertni otsinky) [Diagnosis of the state and prospects of social responsibility in Ukraine (expert assessments)] (296 p.). Institute of Industrial Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review.
- Porter, М. (2003). CSP – a religion with too many priests? European Business Forum, 5, 89.
- PwC (2019). Corporate responsibility.
- Saprykina, M. (Ed.) (2019). Praktyky KSV v Ukraini 2019 [CSR practices in Ukraine 2019] (152 p.). Kyiv: CSR Development Center. (In Ukrainian).
- Segodnya.ua (2019). KSV v Ukraini nabyraie obertiv [CSR in Ukraine is gaining momentum]. (In Ukrainian).
- Serikova, O. (2013). Social Responsibility of Partners of Labour Relations as a Factor of Rational Use of Labour Potential: Theoretical and Methodological Approach. Business Inform, 11, 234–239. (In Ukrainian).
- Shira, N., & Ivashchenko, A. (2013). Directions of implementation of the system of corporate social responsibility in the practice of ukrainian enterprises. Efektyvna ekonomika - Efficient economy, 11, 22–27. (In Ukrainian).
- The RepTrak Company (2020). A Decade of Reputation Leaders (11 p.).
- Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.