Corporate dynamism and cash holding decision in listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.01
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 1-12
- Cited by
- 1052 Views
-
105 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Cash holding decision is a very crucial decision that strongly affects the performance of an organization. Corporate dynamism as a corporate governance tool was explored in this study in order to establish its relationship with cash holding decision in listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. Board skill, female leadership, foreign directors, board ownership and directors’ compensation were used as proxies for corporate dynamism. A panel regression model was adopted in this study to examine the implication of corporate dynamism on cash holding decisions spanning six years from 2012 to 2017. Random sampling technique was employed in order to arrive at thirty firms out of thirty-seven listed manufacturing firms, which comprised industrial and consumer goods sector. Board ownership and the existence of foreign expatriates were found to have a significant effect on cash holding decisions. It is concluded that directors with significant holdings tend to be more aggressive towards activities that enhance the performance of a firm, one of which is ensuring that optimal level of cash is held at a particular point in time in order to guide against liquidity problems, which may be caused by overtrading or even keeping excess idle cash, which is supposed to be invested in profitable ventures. Also, the fact that the existence of foreign expatriates will affect cash holding decisions, which may be justified by the fact foreign expatriates are displaying expertise because of diverse experience that they have been able to gain from different parts of the world.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, G34, M41
-
References44
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Summary of variables
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlation analysis
- Table 4. Random effects – Hausman test
- Table 5. Panel regression analysis
- Table A1. Random effect regression analysis
-
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
- Agnew, J., Pierluigi, B., & Sunden, A. (2003). Portfolio Choice and Trading in a Large 401(k) Plan. American Economic Review, 93(1), 193-215.
- Ahsan, S., & Ullah, N. (2013). Impact of Cashflow Volatility on Cash-Cash Flow Sensitivity of Pakistani Firms. Journal of Business and Management, 8(1), 85-97.
- Alam, Z. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Project Finance: Cash Flow Volatility and Correlation.
- Al-Najjar, B., & Clark, E. (2017). Corporate governance and cash holdings in MENA: Evidence from internal and external governance practices. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 1-12.
- Al Zararee, A. N., & Al-Azzawi, A. (2014). The Impact of Free Cash Flow on Market Value of Firm. Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(2), 56-63.
- Amess, K., Banerji, S., & Lampousis, A. (2015). Corporate cash holdings : Causes and consequences. International Review of Financial Analysis, 42, 421-433.
- Asaleye, A. J., Adama, J. I., & Ogunjobi, J. O. (2018). Financial sector and manufacturing sector performance: evidence from Nigeria. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(3), 35-48.
- Asaleye, A. J., Popoola, O., Lawal, A. I., Ogundipe, A., & Ezenwoke, O. (2018). The credit channels of monetary policy transmission: implications on output and employment in Nigeria. Banks and Bank Systems, 13(4), 103-118.
- Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 261-292.
- Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537-579.
- Benavides, J., Berggrun, L., & Perafan, H. (2016). Dividend payout policies: Evidence from Latin America. Finance Research Letters, 17, 197-210.
- Bhagat, S., & Obreja, I. (2012). Employment, Corporate Investment and Cash Flow Uncertainty.
- Connor, M. O., & Yaghoubi, M. (2016). The influence of cash flow volatility on capital structure and the use of debt of different maturities. Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 18-36.
- Eluyela, D. F., Akintimehin, O. O., Okere, W., Ozordi, E., Osuma, G. O., Ilogho, S. O., & Oladipo, O. A. (2018a). Datasets for board meeting frequency and financial performance of Nigerian deposit money banks. Data in Brief, 19, 1852-1855.
- Eluyela, D. F., Akintimehin, O. O., Okere, W., Ozordi, E., Osuma, G. O., Ilogho, S. O., & Oladipo, O. A. (2018b). Board meeting frequency and firm performance: examining the nexus in Nigerian deposit money banks. Heliyon, 4(10), 850.
- Faccio, M., Marchica, M., & Mura, R. (2012). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193-209.
- Fryman, C., & Saks, R. E. (2010). Executive compensation: A new view from a long-term perspective. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 2099-2138.
- Han, S., & Box, P. O. (2017). Oil Price Volatility, an Economic Determinant of Earnings Volatility Empirical Analysis on Earnings Volatility of U. S. Oil and Gas companies between 1986–2016 (Master’s Thesis). Aalto University School of Business Accounting.
- Hilgen, M. (2015, September). The determinants of cash holdings: Evidence from German listed firms (Master Thesis).
- Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. (2013). Gender and Corporate Finance: Are Male Executives Overconfident Relative to Female Executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822-839.
- Jamil, S., Anwar, A., Afzaal, N., Tariq, A., & Asif, M. (2016). Determinants of Corporate Cash Holdings: Empirical Analysis of Pakistani Firms. Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(3), 29-35.
- Jeon, J. Q., & Ryoo, J. (2013). How do foreign investors affect corporate policy? Evidence from Korea. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25, 52-65.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
- Kuan, T., Li, C., & Chu, S. (2011). Cash holdings and corporate governance in family-controlled firms. Journal of Business Research, 64(7), 757-764.
- Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2007). Accounting Information, Disclosure, and the Cost of Capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 385-420.
- Liu, Y., & Mauer, D. (2011). Corporate cash holdings and CEO compensation incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 183-198.
- Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2010). Women on Board and Firm Performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(2), 491-509.
- Mosavi, S. A., Karimipoua, M., Zarei, M., & Heidari, M. (2015). The Relationship between cash Flow Volatility and Capital Structure in Tehran Stock Exchange. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 9(11), 2034-2040.
- Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2017). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian Securities Exchange-listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 874-885.
- Oladipo, O. A., Iyoha, O. F., Fakile, A. S., Asaleye, A. J., & Eluyela, D. F. (2019). Do government taxes have implications on manufacturing sector output ? evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(3), 181-190.
- Orens, R., & Reheul, A. (2013). Do CEO demographics explain cash holdings in SMEs? European Management Journal, 31(6), 549-563.
- Ozordi, E., Uwuigbe, U., Teddy, O., Tolulope, I., & Eyitomi, G. A. (2018). Corporate diversity and corporate social environmental disclosure of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(3), 229-244.
- Peck-Ling, T., Nai-Chiek, A., & Chee-Seong, L. (2016). Foreign Ownership, Foreign Directors and the Profitability of Malaysian Listed Companies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 580-588.
- Reyna, J. M. (2017). Estructura de propiedad y su efecto en la política de dividendos en el contexto mexicano. Contaduria y Administracion, 62(4), 1183-1198.
- Sabbadini, A., & Lim, M. (2011). Cash Flow Risk Management – in good times and bad. Paper presented at ERM Symposium 2011, Chicago, IL.
- Santosuosso, P. (2015). How Cash Flow Volatility Affects Debt Financing and Accounts Payable. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(8), 138-145.
- Schoubben, F., & Uytbergen, S. (2014). The effect of gender diversity on corporate cash policy (36 p.).
- Scordis, N. A., Barrese, J., & Wang, P. (2017). The Impact of Cash Flow Volatility on Systematic Risk. Western Risk and Insurance Association, 31(1), 43-71.
- Sunden, A., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the Allocation of Assets in Retirement Savings Plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207-211.
- Thi, D., & Nhan, T. (2016). A Review of Cash Holding and Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Transition Economies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6, 354-358.
- Thi, D., & Nhan, T. (2018). Cash holding, Corporate governance mechanisms and Firm value in transition economies: A study of listed corporations in Vietnam.
- Uwalomwa, U., Olamide, O., & Francis, I. (2015). The Effects of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Firms Dividend Payout Policy in Nigeria.
- Vo, D., & Phan, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development, 21(8), 62-78.