Cooperating for knowledge and innovation performance: the case of selected Central and Eastern European countries
-
Received June 15, 2020;Accepted November 25, 2020;Published December 11, 2020
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-1095Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-8274
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.22
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 264-274
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by3 articlesJournal title: Journal of Small Business and Enterprise DevelopmentArticle title: Innovation and productivity in small and medium-sized enterprises: evidence from the Colombian manufacturing sectorDOI: 10.1108/JSBED-12-2022-0502Volume: 30 / Issue: 5 / First page: 1011 / Year: 2023Contributors: Nadia Albis Salas, Henry Mora Holguin, Diana Lucio-Arias, Erika Celene Sánchez, Nelson VillarrealJournal title: EconomiesArticle title: Mediating Role of Firm R&D in Creating Product and Process Innovation: Empirical Evidence from NorwayDOI: 10.3390/economies9020056Volume: 9 / Issue: 2 / First page: 56 / Year: 2021Contributors: Yee Yee Sein, Viktor ProkopJournal title: Journal of African BusinessArticle title: Determinants of Technological and non-technological Innovations: Evidence from Ghana’ Manufacturing and Service SectorsDOI: 10.1080/15228916.2022.2113209Volume: 24 / Issue: 3 / First page: 467 / Year: 2023Contributors: Samuel Amponsah Odei, Michael Amponsah Odei, Evelyn Toseafa
- 629 Views
-
100 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The open innovation concept thrives on knowledge and information flow; their sources for the current innovation performance of the selected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries have since triggered research interest. This research aimed to explore the different sources of knowledge and information for innovation and the extent to which these different sources contribute to the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in some selected CEE countries. The study assesses the influence of different knowledge and information sources and their relationships in SMEs engaged in manufacturing activities for innovation performance in the selected CEE countries using structural equation modeling. Data were sourced from the anonymized European Community Innovation Survey (CIS, 2012). The results show that internal sources of information and knowledge from innovative internal activities highly influence SMEs’ innovation performance in these CEE countries. Additionally, SMEs in the selected countries’ sources of information and knowledge influence firm cooperation arrangements. The result is significant for SMEs and policymakers to ensure fostering information and knowledge sharing and support of creating valuable knowledge for innovation, most importantly, in the aftermath of financial and economic crisis.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by a grant provided by the scientific research project of the Czech Sciences Foundation Grant No. 20-03037S.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O30, O38, М31, D83
-
References56
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research analytical framework
-
- Table 1. Description of dependent and independent variables
- Table 2. Summary of the construct reliability and validity
- Table 3. Goodness-of-fit
- Table 4. PLS-SEM path coefficient
-
- Atkinson, R., & Wial, H. (2008). Boosting productivity, innovation, and growth through a National Innovation Foundation (8 p.). Washington: Brookings Institution.
- Aydalot, P., & Keeble, D. (Eds.) (2018). High technology industry and innovative environments: the European experience (254 p.). London: Routledge.
- Basit, S. A., & Medase, K. (2019). The diversity of knowledge sources and its impact on firm-level innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(4), 681-714.
- Bigliardi, B., & Galati, F. (2016). Which factors hinder the adoption of open innovation in SMEs? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(8), 869-885.
- Braga, V., Gonçalves, A., & Braga, A. (2016). The Portuguese textile industry business cooperation: informal relationships for international entry. The Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mechatronics, 49, 52-60.
- Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2017). The role of inter-SME networking and links in innovative high technology milieux. In D. Keeble & F. Wilkinson (Eds.), High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe (pp. 118-155). London: Routledge.
- Chesbrough, H. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34-41.
- Christensen, J., Hain, D., & Nogueira, L. (2019). Joining forces: collaboration patterns and performance of renewable energy innovators. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 793-814.
- Curley, M. (2016). Twelve principles for open innovation 2.0. Nature, 533(7603), 314-316.
- De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70-87.
- De Zubielqui, G., Lindsay, N., Lindsay, W., & Jones, J. (2019). Knowledge quality, innovation and firm performance: a study of knowledge transfer in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 145-164.
- Fernández-Sastre, J., & Reyes-Vintimilla, P. (2020). The influence of the regional context on firms’ innovation patterns: evidence from Ecuador. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(5), 503-515.
- Fischer, S., & Sahay, R. (2000). The transition economies after ten years (Working Paper No. 7664). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Grover, V., & Kohli, R. (2012). Co-creating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for multi-firm environments. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 225-232.
- Gupta, S., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Marketing innovation: a resource-based view of international and local firms. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(2), 111-126.
- Gupta, S., Malhotra, N., Czinkota, M., & Foroudi, P. (2016). Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5671-5681.
- Gyamfi, S., & Stejskal, J. (2019a). Does External Knowledge Acquisition and Innovation Performance in Firms? (449 p.). Paper presented at 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM). Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.
- Gyamfi, S., & Stejskal, J. (2019b). University-industry cooperation and firm´s knowledge absorptive capacity nexus. Paper presented at 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies.
- Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C., Randolph, A., & Chong, A. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442-458.
- Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
- Halásková, M., & Bednář, P. (2018). Public research and development in European Union countries evaluation based on selected indicators. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 26(43), 74-86.
- Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. (2016). Using PLS path modelling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Hudec, O. (2015). Visegrad countries and regions: Innovation performance and efficiency. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(2), 55-72.
- Izsak, K., & Radošević, S. (2017). EU research and innovation policies as factors of convergence or divergence after the crisis. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 274-283.
- Izsak, K., Markianidou, P., Lukach, R., & Wastyn, A. (2013). The impact of the crisis on research and innovation policies (Study for the European Commission DG Research by Technopolis Group Belgium and Idea Consult) (95 p.).
- Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680-693.
- Klasová, S. (2018). The Role of Agglomeration Economies in the Employment Growth in the Knowledge Intensive Services. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 25(42), 92-103.
- Kotkova Striteska, M., & Prokop, V. (2020). Dynamic Innovation Strategy Model in Practice of Innovation Leaders and Followers in CEE Countries – A Prerequisite for Building Innovative Ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(9), 3918.
- Kozena, M., Striteska, M., & Svoboda, O. (2011). Dynamic balanced scorecard: model for sustainable regional development. Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development, 7(7), 211-221.
- Krammer, S. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845-860.
- Lee, V., Foo, A., Leong, L., & Ooi, K. (2016). Can competitive advantage be achieved through knowledge management? A case study on SMEs. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 136-151.
- Liu, C. (2018). Examining social capital, organizational learning and knowledge transfer in cultural and creative industries of practice. Tourism Management, 64, 258-270.
- MacGregor, R. (2004). Factors associated with formal networking in regional small business: some findings from a study of Swedish SME’s. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 60-74.
- Meričková, B., Štrangfeldová, J., Muthová, N., & Štefanišinová, N. (2020). Performance Measurement in Education Public Services Based on the Value for Money Concept. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 28(3), 1099.
- Moura, D., Madeira, M., Duarte, F., Carvalho, J., & Kahilana, O. (2019). Absorptive capacity and cooperation evidence in innovation from public policies for innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(1), 2-19.
- Mukherjee, D., Lahiri, S., Ash, S., & Gaur, A. (2019). Search motives, local embeddedness, and knowledge outcomes in offshoring. Journal of Business Research, 103, 365-375.
- Prokop, V., Stejskal, J., & Hudec, O. (2019). Collaboration for Innovation in Small CEE Countries. E+ M Ekonomie a Management, 22(1), 130.
- Radosevic, S. (2011). Science-industry links in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: conventional policy wisdom facing reality. Science and Public Policy, 38(5), 365-378.
- Rosdi, I., Noor, A., & Fauzi, N. (2020). External knowledge acquisition and innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. In Understanding Digital Industry: Proceedings of the Conference on Managing Digital Industry, Technology and Entrepreneurship (CoMDITE 2019) (400 p.). Routledge.
- Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Papa, A. (2020). Collaborative modes with cultural and creative industries and innovation performance: the moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity. Technovation, 92-93, 102040.
- Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., Giacosa, E., & Giovando, G. (2018). How SMEs engage in open innovation: a survey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 561-574.
- Srholec, M., & Žížalová, P. (2014). Mapping the geography of R&D: What can we learn for regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic and beyond? European Planning Studies, 22(9), 1862-1878.
- Stejskal, J., Hajek, P., & Prokop, V. (2018). Collaboration and innovation models in information and communication creative industries-The case of Germany. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 17(2), 191-208.
- Strelcová, S., & Janasová, D. (2018). Clustering small and medium enterprises in the transport industry. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 25(42), 200-210.
- Stříteská, M., Zapletal, D., & Jelínková, L. (2016). Performance management systems in Czech companies: findings from a questionnaire survey. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 19(4), 44-55.
- Svetina, A., & Prodan, I. (2008). How internal and external sources of knowledge contribute to firms’ innovation performance. Managing Global Transitions, 6(3), 277-299.
- Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2016). How do firms acquire knowledge in different sectoral and regional contexts? In R. Shearmu, Ch. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Toth, J., Torok, A., & Balogh, J. (2018). Networking theory of innovation in practice. A Pan-European overview based on the Community Innovation Survey. Paper presented at International Association of Agricultural Economists 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
- Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687-705.
- Tsouri, M. (2019). Knowledge transfer in time of crisis: evidence from the Trentino region. Industry and Innovation, 26(7), 820-842.
- Tu, C., Hwang, S., & Wong, J. (2014). How does cooperation affect innovation in micro-enterprises? Management Decision, 52(8), 1390-1409.
- Vicente-Saez, R., Gustafsson, R., & van den Brande, L. (2020). The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156.
- Von Delft, S., Kortmann, S., Gelhard, C., & Pisani, N. (2019). Leveraging global sources of knowledge for business model innovation. Long Range Planning, 52(5).
- Zawojska, A. (2010). Determinants of farmers’ trust in government agricultural agencies in Poland. Agricultural Economics, 56(6), 266-283.
- Zdražil, P., & Kozuń-Cieślak, G. (2017). The role of cross-border cooperation initiatives in respect of regional development: case study of Euroregion Neisse. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 25(2).
-
-
Conceptualization
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Data curation
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Investigation
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Project administration
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Resources
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Software
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Writing – original draft
Solomon Gyamfi
-
Formal Analysis
Jan Stejskal
-
Funding acquisition
Jan Stejskal
-
Methodology
Jan Stejskal
-
Supervision
Jan Stejskal
-
Writing – review & editing
Jan Stejskal
-
Conceptualization
-
Factors affecting service quality at Vietnamese retail banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 39-48 Views: 6516 Downloads: 1396 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSustainable growth and development can be the most important lesson that banks have learned in recent decades. Banks would gain many benefits, win the competition and develop sustainably if there have been more and more loyal customers. Customer satisfaction will help build customer loyalty. In order to have loyal customers, service quality must be good. Quality customer service of the bank is to ensure customer satisfaction and take their needs into consideration to improve service quality. High customer service quality will generate value not only to meet customer needs but also the expectations of customers and make banks more prominent than their competitors. This study identifies factors that affect customer satisfaction with the service quality at Vietnamese retail banks. The results are obtained by qualitative and quantitative method. The research model with a questionnaire consisting of 22 variables, 5 scales for a survey of 554 customers, is identified and developed through interviews with experts and group discussions. The findings show that customer satisfaction with the service quality at retail banks is influenced by “reliability”, “responsiveness”, “empathy”, “security”, and “tangibles”. Based on the findings, solutions for improving service quality are proposed for Vietnamese retail banks.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana , Gede Suparna , I Gusti Made Suwandana , Sebastian Kot , Ismi Rajiani doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 3559 Downloads: 851 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
-
SDG 4 and SDG 8 in the knowledge economy: A meta-analysis in the context of post-COVID-19 recovery
Inna Makarenko , Alex Plastun , Yuriy Petrushenko , Anna Vorontsova , Stanislaw Alwasiak doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.05(1).2021.05Knowledge and Performance Management Volume 5, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 50-67 Views: 2318 Downloads: 364 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯAlmost all human activity spheres, from the health care system to the education system, were unprepared for the pandemic. This, in turn, has slowed down the progress in achieving sustainable development goals. The Sustainable Development Goals 4 “Quality Education” and 8 “Decent Work and Economic Growth” were particularly vulnerable. In addition, the widespread concern was caused in the context of the transition to a “knowledge-based economy”. This paper analyzes the readiness of the scientific community to provide preconditions for the acceleration of these SDGs achievements. To do this, a meta-analysis of the academic literature on SDG 4, SDG 8, and the knowledge-based economy during 2015–2021 was conducted. Several special methods and instruments were used, including Scopus, WoS, VosViewer, Publish or Perish, Google Trends, and Google Books Ngram Viewer. The results show the inability of the modern academic community to provide a theoretical and empirical framework for a successful transition to a knowledge-based economy, taking into account the need to achieve sustainability. This is partly due to the relative subject novelty and the lack of academic attention. The challenges posed by the pandemic (lockdowns, unemployment, closing of educational institutions, financial flows reorientation, etc.) together with potential threats (new pandemic, climate change, population displacement, armed conflicts, etc.) necessitate a radical intensification of academic activity in economics to achieve SDGs.