Changes effectiveness assessment on the basis of sustainable development factor
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.41
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #1, pp. 437-444
- Cited by
- 1430 Views
-
155 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The creation of new management methods that guarantee sustainable economic development in the long-term perspective is impossible without the overall analysis of the existing methods and system elements of enterprise management. Such analysis should take into account the influence of external and internal environment. Most of Russian organizations functioning at the market are characterized by low degree of flexibility and adaptability to the changes at the market and by traditional ways of management which do not correspond to the modern market conditions and it does not allow them to develop perfectly. The article defines the main components of the enterprise sustainable development and offers the matrix model of changes assessment on the basis of sustainable development criterion.
Thus, the general aim of the article is to form theoretical and methodical basis for management mechanism aimed at sustainable development of the enterprise, the mechanism that meets the current demands and global trends of economy development. The main methodical instrument used for the enterprise position assessment is the system of matrix coordinates. The choice of the matrix form is due to the fact that matrices are the main tool for strategic positioning of enterprises and the choice of strategic solutions in conditions of multiplicity of parameters through which the expected and actually obtained results are formalized and measured.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O12, Q01, P29
-
References19
-
Tables0
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Components of CES development stability
- Figure 2. Matrix of CES organizational changes effectiveness
-
- Anthonamma, K., & Kavitha, N. V. (2012). Change management in higher education institutions sustainable development. 6th International Conference of Technology, Education and Development (INTED)) (pp. 5141- 5147). Book series: INTED Proceedings. Valencia: SPAIN.
- Badea, G., Badea, Ana-Cornelia, & Raboj, D. (2016). A new functional master specialization on GIS and sustainable development at faculty of geodesy. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, Bucharest. Albena: BULGARIA.
- Barbier, E. (1987). The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), 101-110.
- Bluszcz, A., & Kijewska, A. (2016). Selected global indicators for the assessment of sustainable development. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference (pp. 523-530). Albena: BULGARIA.
- Borza, M., Brezuleanu, S., Robu, & Alexandru-Dragos (2016). The sustainable development: conceptual and implementing barriers in East-European countries. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference. Albena: BULGARIA.
- Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European journal of operational research, 233(2), 299-312.
- Brealey, Richard A., & Myers Stewart C. (2003). Principles of Corporate Finance (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Che, QuanHui (2016). The evaluation of sustainable development. 3rd International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT) Hangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, 59, 1058- 1060. Book series: Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research.
- Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141.
- Ghemawat, P. (1999). Strategy and the Business Landscape. Addison-Wesley.
- Kaplan, Robert S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
- Li, Fei (2013). Sustainable Development of Medium-Sized High-Tech Industrial Clusters. 4th International Conference on Education and Sports Education. Hong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINA, 12, 46-51.
- Oakland, J. S., Tanner, S. (2007) Successful change management. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(1-2), 1-19.
- Proctor, T., Doukakis, I. (2003). Change management: the role of internal communication and employee development. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 8(4), 268-277.
- Price, A. D. F., Chahal, K. (2006). A strategic framework for change management. Construction Management and Economics, 24(3), 237-251.
- Sidorova, L. (2015). Social responsibility and organizational management at the university of Carabobo: short-term changes in sync inescapable. Dialogica, 12(1), 209-234.
- Stoian, M., & Nica, Ana-Maria (2016). Eco-innovation between sustainable development and economic performance. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference. Albena: BULGARIA.
- Yu, Zhigang, & Chen, Rongrong (2015). Educational Sustainable Development: The New Research Topic of National Demonstration Higher Vocational Education. 3rd International Conference on Management, Education, Information and Control, Shenyang, PEOPLES R CHINA, 125, 1172-1175.
- Zhang, L. (2016). The secret of sustainable development. 3rd International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT), Hangzhou, PEOPLES R CHINA, 59, 1046-1049. Book series: Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research.